社区老年人每日服用低剂量阿司匹林与血压。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Michael E. Ernst PharmD, Kevin Phan MBiostat, Mark R. Nelson MBBS, PhD, Robyn L. Woods PhD, Michelle A. Fravel PharmD, Lawrence Beilin MB, MD, Suzanne G. Orchard PhD, Zhen Zhou PhD, Kevan R. Polkinghorne MBChB, PhD, Jonathan C. Broder MStat&OpRes, Karen L. Margolis MD, MPH, Christopher M. Reid PhD, Nigel Stocks MBBS, MD, Enayet Chowdhury MBBS, MP, PhD, Rory Wolfe PhD
{"title":"社区老年人每日服用低剂量阿司匹林与血压。","authors":"Michael E. Ernst PharmD,&nbsp;Kevin Phan MBiostat,&nbsp;Mark R. Nelson MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Robyn L. Woods PhD,&nbsp;Michelle A. Fravel PharmD,&nbsp;Lawrence Beilin MB, MD,&nbsp;Suzanne G. Orchard PhD,&nbsp;Zhen Zhou PhD,&nbsp;Kevan R. Polkinghorne MBChB, PhD,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Broder MStat&OpRes,&nbsp;Karen L. Margolis MD, MPH,&nbsp;Christopher M. Reid PhD,&nbsp;Nigel Stocks MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Enayet Chowdhury MBBS, MP, PhD,&nbsp;Rory Wolfe PhD","doi":"10.1111/jch.14891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-quality randomized trial evidence is lacking on whether low-dose aspirin exerts significant effects on blood pressure (BP) in older adults. The authors assessed longitudinal BP changes in participants enrolled in ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 100 mg daily aspirin in 19 114 community-dwelling Australian and U.S. adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD), dementia, or independence-limiting physical disability. Participants’ BP was recorded at baseline and annual study visits, and managed by their usual care provider. BP trajectories for aspirin versus placebo during 4.7 years of follow-up were examined for systolic and diastolic BP separately, using linear mixed models to account for between and within-individual variability in BP. Analyses by subgroups were also explored with inclusion of interaction terms in the models. The difference in mean change in systolic BP between aspirin and placebo during study follow-up was −0.03 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.13, 0.07; <i>p</i> = .541) (aspirin minus placebo), while the mean difference for change in diastolic BP was −0.05 mm Hg (95% CI: –0.11, 0.01; <i>p</i> = .094). These small, non-significant differences in BP change between the aspirin and placebo groups were consistent across baseline levels of BP and antihypertensive treatment status (treated/untreated). Likewise, subgroups of age, sex, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and frailty revealed no interaction effect between the subgroup, aspirin treatment, and time. Interval-censored Cox proportional hazards regression showed no difference in rates of incident treated hypertension between aspirin and placebo-treated participants. The authors conclude that daily low-dose aspirin does not significantly affect BP in older adults when managed by usual care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daily low-dose aspirin and blood pressure in community-dwelling older adults\",\"authors\":\"Michael E. Ernst PharmD,&nbsp;Kevin Phan MBiostat,&nbsp;Mark R. Nelson MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Robyn L. Woods PhD,&nbsp;Michelle A. Fravel PharmD,&nbsp;Lawrence Beilin MB, MD,&nbsp;Suzanne G. Orchard PhD,&nbsp;Zhen Zhou PhD,&nbsp;Kevan R. Polkinghorne MBChB, PhD,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Broder MStat&OpRes,&nbsp;Karen L. Margolis MD, MPH,&nbsp;Christopher M. Reid PhD,&nbsp;Nigel Stocks MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Enayet Chowdhury MBBS, MP, PhD,&nbsp;Rory Wolfe PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.14891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>High-quality randomized trial evidence is lacking on whether low-dose aspirin exerts significant effects on blood pressure (BP) in older adults. The authors assessed longitudinal BP changes in participants enrolled in ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 100 mg daily aspirin in 19 114 community-dwelling Australian and U.S. adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD), dementia, or independence-limiting physical disability. Participants’ BP was recorded at baseline and annual study visits, and managed by their usual care provider. BP trajectories for aspirin versus placebo during 4.7 years of follow-up were examined for systolic and diastolic BP separately, using linear mixed models to account for between and within-individual variability in BP. Analyses by subgroups were also explored with inclusion of interaction terms in the models. The difference in mean change in systolic BP between aspirin and placebo during study follow-up was −0.03 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.13, 0.07; <i>p</i> = .541) (aspirin minus placebo), while the mean difference for change in diastolic BP was −0.05 mm Hg (95% CI: –0.11, 0.01; <i>p</i> = .094). These small, non-significant differences in BP change between the aspirin and placebo groups were consistent across baseline levels of BP and antihypertensive treatment status (treated/untreated). Likewise, subgroups of age, sex, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and frailty revealed no interaction effect between the subgroup, aspirin treatment, and time. Interval-censored Cox proportional hazards regression showed no difference in rates of incident treated hypertension between aspirin and placebo-treated participants. The authors conclude that daily low-dose aspirin does not significantly affect BP in older adults when managed by usual care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466358/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14891\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低剂量阿司匹林是否对老年人的血压(BP)有显著影响,目前还缺乏高质量的随机试验证据。作者评估了参加 ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) 研究的参与者的纵向血压变化情况,该研究是一项随机、安慰剂对照试验,对 19 114 名居住在社区的澳大利亚和美国成年人每天服用 100 毫克阿司匹林,这些人没有心血管疾病 (CVD)、痴呆或限制自理能力的肢体残疾。参与者的血压在基线和年度研究访问时均有记录,并由其日常护理人员进行管理。采用线性混合模型分别研究了阿司匹林与安慰剂在 4.7 年随访期间的收缩压和舒张压变化轨迹,以考虑血压在个体间和个体内的变化。在模型中加入交互项后,还对亚组进行了分析。在研究随访期间,阿司匹林和安慰剂的收缩压平均变化差异为-0.03毫米汞柱(95% 置信区间[CI]:-0.13,0.07;p = .541)(阿司匹林减去安慰剂),而舒张压变化的平均差异为-0.05毫米汞柱(95% 置信区间:-0.11,0.01;p = .094)。阿司匹林组与安慰剂组之间血压变化的这些微小而不显著的差异在血压基线水平和抗高血压治疗状态(治疗/未治疗)方面是一致的。同样,年龄、性别、慢性肾病、糖尿病和虚弱等亚组显示,亚组、阿司匹林治疗和时间之间没有交互作用。区间删失 Cox 比例危险度回归显示,阿司匹林治疗者和安慰剂治疗者的高血压发病率没有差异。作者的结论是,如果采用常规治疗,每日服用小剂量阿司匹林不会对老年人的血压产生明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Daily low-dose aspirin and blood pressure in community-dwelling older adults

High-quality randomized trial evidence is lacking on whether low-dose aspirin exerts significant effects on blood pressure (BP) in older adults. The authors assessed longitudinal BP changes in participants enrolled in ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 100 mg daily aspirin in 19 114 community-dwelling Australian and U.S. adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD), dementia, or independence-limiting physical disability. Participants’ BP was recorded at baseline and annual study visits, and managed by their usual care provider. BP trajectories for aspirin versus placebo during 4.7 years of follow-up were examined for systolic and diastolic BP separately, using linear mixed models to account for between and within-individual variability in BP. Analyses by subgroups were also explored with inclusion of interaction terms in the models. The difference in mean change in systolic BP between aspirin and placebo during study follow-up was −0.03 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.13, 0.07; p = .541) (aspirin minus placebo), while the mean difference for change in diastolic BP was −0.05 mm Hg (95% CI: –0.11, 0.01; p = .094). These small, non-significant differences in BP change between the aspirin and placebo groups were consistent across baseline levels of BP and antihypertensive treatment status (treated/untreated). Likewise, subgroups of age, sex, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and frailty revealed no interaction effect between the subgroup, aspirin treatment, and time. Interval-censored Cox proportional hazards regression showed no difference in rates of incident treated hypertension between aspirin and placebo-treated participants. The authors conclude that daily low-dose aspirin does not significantly affect BP in older adults when managed by usual care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信