Sion Scott , Bethany Atkins , Thomas D'Costa , Claire Rendle , Katherine Murphy , David Taylor , Caroline Smith , Ian Kellar , Andrew Briggs , Alys Griffiths , Rebekah Hornak , Anne Spinewine , Wade Thompson , Ross Tsuyuki , Debi Bhattacharya
{"title":"制定研究成果传播指南(GuiDiR):综合框架。","authors":"Sion Scott , Bethany Atkins , Thomas D'Costa , Claire Rendle , Katherine Murphy , David Taylor , Caroline Smith , Ian Kellar , Andrew Briggs , Alys Griffiths , Rebekah Hornak , Anne Spinewine , Wade Thompson , Ross Tsuyuki , Debi Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Less than one third of research evidence is translated into policy or practice. Knowledge translation requires effective dissemination, adoption and finally implementation. These three stages are equally important, however, existing knowledge translation models and frameworks provide little and disparate information about the steps and activities required for effective dissemination.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to empirically develop a consolidated framework of evidence-based steps and activities for disseminating research evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified models and frameworks from a scoping review and dissemination and implementation webtool. We synthesised them into a prototype dissemination framework. Models and frameworks were eligible to inform steps in our framework if they fulfilled at least one of three elements of dissemination: intending to generate awareness of a message, incorporates targeting an audience: tailoring communication. An initial coding framework was created to organise data into dissemination steps.</p><p>Drawing on ‘co-approach’ principles, authors of the included models and frameworks (dissemination experts) and health service researchers (end users) were invited to test and refine the prototype framework at a workshop.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 48 models and frameworks reviewed, only 32 fulfilled one or more of the three dissemination elements. The initial coding framework, upon refinement, yielded the Guide to Disseminating Research (GuiDiR) comprising five steps.</p><p>1) Identify target audiences and dissemination partners.</p><p>2) Engage with dissemination partners.</p><p>3) Identify barriers and enablers to dissemination.</p><p>4) Create dissemination messages.</p><p>5) Disseminate and evaluate.</p><p>Multiple activities were identified for each step and no single model or framework represents all steps and activities in GuiDiR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GuiDiR unifies dissemination components from knowledge translation models and frameworks and harmonises language into a format accessible to non-experts. It outlines for researchers, funders and practitioners the expected structure of dissemination and details the activities for executing an evidence-based dissemination strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":"20 11","pages":"Pages 1047-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Guide to Disseminating Research (GuiDiR): A consolidated framework\",\"authors\":\"Sion Scott , Bethany Atkins , Thomas D'Costa , Claire Rendle , Katherine Murphy , David Taylor , Caroline Smith , Ian Kellar , Andrew Briggs , Alys Griffiths , Rebekah Hornak , Anne Spinewine , Wade Thompson , Ross Tsuyuki , Debi Bhattacharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Less than one third of research evidence is translated into policy or practice. Knowledge translation requires effective dissemination, adoption and finally implementation. These three stages are equally important, however, existing knowledge translation models and frameworks provide little and disparate information about the steps and activities required for effective dissemination.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to empirically develop a consolidated framework of evidence-based steps and activities for disseminating research evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified models and frameworks from a scoping review and dissemination and implementation webtool. We synthesised them into a prototype dissemination framework. Models and frameworks were eligible to inform steps in our framework if they fulfilled at least one of three elements of dissemination: intending to generate awareness of a message, incorporates targeting an audience: tailoring communication. An initial coding framework was created to organise data into dissemination steps.</p><p>Drawing on ‘co-approach’ principles, authors of the included models and frameworks (dissemination experts) and health service researchers (end users) were invited to test and refine the prototype framework at a workshop.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 48 models and frameworks reviewed, only 32 fulfilled one or more of the three dissemination elements. The initial coding framework, upon refinement, yielded the Guide to Disseminating Research (GuiDiR) comprising five steps.</p><p>1) Identify target audiences and dissemination partners.</p><p>2) Engage with dissemination partners.</p><p>3) Identify barriers and enablers to dissemination.</p><p>4) Create dissemination messages.</p><p>5) Disseminate and evaluate.</p><p>Multiple activities were identified for each step and no single model or framework represents all steps and activities in GuiDiR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GuiDiR unifies dissemination components from knowledge translation models and frameworks and harmonises language into a format accessible to non-experts. It outlines for researchers, funders and practitioners the expected structure of dissemination and details the activities for executing an evidence-based dissemination strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"20 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1047-1057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155174112400233X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155174112400233X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of the Guide to Disseminating Research (GuiDiR): A consolidated framework
Background
Less than one third of research evidence is translated into policy or practice. Knowledge translation requires effective dissemination, adoption and finally implementation. These three stages are equally important, however, existing knowledge translation models and frameworks provide little and disparate information about the steps and activities required for effective dissemination.
Objective
This study aimed to empirically develop a consolidated framework of evidence-based steps and activities for disseminating research evidence.
Methods
We identified models and frameworks from a scoping review and dissemination and implementation webtool. We synthesised them into a prototype dissemination framework. Models and frameworks were eligible to inform steps in our framework if they fulfilled at least one of three elements of dissemination: intending to generate awareness of a message, incorporates targeting an audience: tailoring communication. An initial coding framework was created to organise data into dissemination steps.
Drawing on ‘co-approach’ principles, authors of the included models and frameworks (dissemination experts) and health service researchers (end users) were invited to test and refine the prototype framework at a workshop.
Results
From 48 models and frameworks reviewed, only 32 fulfilled one or more of the three dissemination elements. The initial coding framework, upon refinement, yielded the Guide to Disseminating Research (GuiDiR) comprising five steps.
1) Identify target audiences and dissemination partners.
2) Engage with dissemination partners.
3) Identify barriers and enablers to dissemination.
4) Create dissemination messages.
5) Disseminate and evaluate.
Multiple activities were identified for each step and no single model or framework represents all steps and activities in GuiDiR.
Conclusions
GuiDiR unifies dissemination components from knowledge translation models and frameworks and harmonises language into a format accessible to non-experts. It outlines for researchers, funders and practitioners the expected structure of dissemination and details the activities for executing an evidence-based dissemination strategy.
期刊介绍:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.