在实际操作中,在标准时间窗和延长时间窗内使用不同剂量的 IV-tPA 进行桥式机械血栓切除术的治疗效果。

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Hao-Te Liu, Wen-Chun Deng, Ching-Wen Chang, Yi Ming Wu, Ho-Fai Wong, Chien-Hung Chang, Mun-Chun Yeap, Ching-Chang Chen, Chung-Ting Chen, Yu-Ting Huang, Yao-Liang Chen
{"title":"在实际操作中,在标准时间窗和延长时间窗内使用不同剂量的 IV-tPA 进行桥式机械血栓切除术的治疗效果。","authors":"Hao-Te Liu, Wen-Chun Deng, Ching-Wen Chang, Yi Ming Wu, Ho-Fai Wong, Chien-Hung Chang, Mun-Chun Yeap, Ching-Chang Chen, Chung-Ting Chen, Yu-Ting Huang, Yao-Liang Chen","doi":"10.1177/19714009241269447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences of treatment outcome between full or reduced dose of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for bridge mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the extended time window have not been clearly established. We aimed to present real-world results of bridge MT with different tPA dosages in the standard and extended windows.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with MT between 2017 and 2021 at two stroke referral centers were retrospectively reviewed. Bridge MT with tPA were categorized as full (0.9 mg/kg) or reduced (<0.9 mg/kg) dose. Standard window (SW) cohort was defined as MT performed within 6 h of acute ischemic stroke onset, while those beyond 6 h as the extended window (EW) cohort. 90 days Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, technical treatment success, in-hospital mortality, and post-treatment hemorrhage were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 423 patients met the inclusion criteria, 218 of which treated in the SW, while 205 treated in the EW. Within the SW cohort, the full-dose tPA group demonstrated a higher proportion of good functional outcome (GFO) at 90 days (mRS0-3) versus reduced (49% vs 21%, <i>p</i> = 0.0358). The overall GFO of SW was higher than that of the EW cohort (33% vs 20%, <i>p</i> = 0.0480). Within the EW cohort, GFO was similar between full and reduced dose groups. Successful reperfusion rate was lower in SW versus EW cohorts (39% vs 58%, <i>p</i> = 0.0199).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, the GFO of bridge MT is better than MT alone. The tPA dosage is not a determining factor of GFO in EW MT.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009241269447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment outcome of bridge mechanical thrombectomy with different IV-tPA dosages in the standard and extended time window in real-world practice.\",\"authors\":\"Hao-Te Liu, Wen-Chun Deng, Ching-Wen Chang, Yi Ming Wu, Ho-Fai Wong, Chien-Hung Chang, Mun-Chun Yeap, Ching-Chang Chen, Chung-Ting Chen, Yu-Ting Huang, Yao-Liang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009241269447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences of treatment outcome between full or reduced dose of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for bridge mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the extended time window have not been clearly established. We aimed to present real-world results of bridge MT with different tPA dosages in the standard and extended windows.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with MT between 2017 and 2021 at two stroke referral centers were retrospectively reviewed. Bridge MT with tPA were categorized as full (0.9 mg/kg) or reduced (<0.9 mg/kg) dose. Standard window (SW) cohort was defined as MT performed within 6 h of acute ischemic stroke onset, while those beyond 6 h as the extended window (EW) cohort. 90 days Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, technical treatment success, in-hospital mortality, and post-treatment hemorrhage were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 423 patients met the inclusion criteria, 218 of which treated in the SW, while 205 treated in the EW. Within the SW cohort, the full-dose tPA group demonstrated a higher proportion of good functional outcome (GFO) at 90 days (mRS0-3) versus reduced (49% vs 21%, <i>p</i> = 0.0358). The overall GFO of SW was higher than that of the EW cohort (33% vs 20%, <i>p</i> = 0.0480). Within the EW cohort, GFO was similar between full and reduced dose groups. Successful reperfusion rate was lower in SW versus EW cohorts (39% vs 58%, <i>p</i> = 0.0199).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, the GFO of bridge MT is better than MT alone. The tPA dosage is not a determining factor of GFO in EW MT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009241269447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241269447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241269447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在延长时间窗内使用全剂量或低剂量组织血浆酶原激活剂(tPA)进行桥接机械血栓切除术(MT)的治疗效果差异尚未明确确定。我们旨在介绍在标准时间窗和延长时间窗使用不同剂量 tPA 进行桥接机械取栓术的实际结果:回顾性研究了2017年至2021年间在两家卒中转诊中心接受MT治疗的前循环卒中患者。使用tPA的桥接MT分为全量(0.9 mg/kg)和减量(Results:共有 423 例患者符合纳入标准,其中 218 例在 SW 治疗,205 例在 EW 治疗。在 SW 组群中,全剂量 tPA 组 90 天后(mRS0-3)的良好功能预后(GFO)比例高于减量组(49% 对 21%,P = 0.0358)。SW组的总体GFO高于EW组(33% vs 20%,p = 0.0480)。在 EW 组群中,全剂量组和减量组的 GFO 相似。SW组的再灌注成功率低于EW组(39% vs 58%,P = 0.0199):结论:在实际应用中,桥接 MT 的 GFO 优于单用 MT。结论:在实际应用中,桥接 MT 的 GFO 优于单纯 MT,tPA 剂量不是 EW MT GFO 的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment outcome of bridge mechanical thrombectomy with different IV-tPA dosages in the standard and extended time window in real-world practice.

Background: Differences of treatment outcome between full or reduced dose of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for bridge mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the extended time window have not been clearly established. We aimed to present real-world results of bridge MT with different tPA dosages in the standard and extended windows.

Materials and methods: Patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with MT between 2017 and 2021 at two stroke referral centers were retrospectively reviewed. Bridge MT with tPA were categorized as full (0.9 mg/kg) or reduced (<0.9 mg/kg) dose. Standard window (SW) cohort was defined as MT performed within 6 h of acute ischemic stroke onset, while those beyond 6 h as the extended window (EW) cohort. 90 days Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, technical treatment success, in-hospital mortality, and post-treatment hemorrhage were analyzed.

Results: A total of 423 patients met the inclusion criteria, 218 of which treated in the SW, while 205 treated in the EW. Within the SW cohort, the full-dose tPA group demonstrated a higher proportion of good functional outcome (GFO) at 90 days (mRS0-3) versus reduced (49% vs 21%, p = 0.0358). The overall GFO of SW was higher than that of the EW cohort (33% vs 20%, p = 0.0480). Within the EW cohort, GFO was similar between full and reduced dose groups. Successful reperfusion rate was lower in SW versus EW cohorts (39% vs 58%, p = 0.0199).

Conclusion: In real-world practice, the GFO of bridge MT is better than MT alone. The tPA dosage is not a determining factor of GFO in EW MT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信