Reto Reiser , Anne-Kathrin Brill , Christos T. Nakas , Urs Hefti , David Berger , Eveline Perret Hoigné , Hans-Joachim Kabitz , Tobias M. Merz , Jacqueline Pichler Hefti
{"title":"肺功能参数与急性高山病有关,在高海拔和极高海拔地区会得到改善。","authors":"Reto Reiser , Anne-Kathrin Brill , Christos T. Nakas , Urs Hefti , David Berger , Eveline Perret Hoigné , Hans-Joachim Kabitz , Tobias M. Merz , Jacqueline Pichler Hefti","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>At altitude, factors such as decreased barometric pressure, low temperatures, and acclimatization might affect lung function.</p><p>The effects of exposure and acclimatization to high-altitude on lung function were assessed in 39 subjects by repetitive spirometry up to 6022 m during a high-altitude expedition. Subjects were classified depending on the occurrence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) and summit success to evaluate whether lung function relates to successful climb and risk of developing AMS.</p><p>Peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased with progressive altitude (max. +20.2 %pred, +9.3 %pred, and +6.7 %pred, all p<0.05). Only PEF improved with acclimatization (BC1 vs. BC2, +7.2 %pred, p=0.044). At altitude FEV1 (p=0.008) and PEF (p<0.001) were lower in the AMS group.</p><p>The risk of developing AMS was associated with lower baseline PEF (p<0.001) and longitudinal changes in PEF (p=0.008) and FEV1 (p<0.001). Lung function was not related to summit success (7126 m). Improvement in PEF after acclimatization might indicate respiratory muscle adaptation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 104318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung function parameters are associated with acute mountain sickness and are improved at high and extreme altitude\",\"authors\":\"Reto Reiser , Anne-Kathrin Brill , Christos T. Nakas , Urs Hefti , David Berger , Eveline Perret Hoigné , Hans-Joachim Kabitz , Tobias M. Merz , Jacqueline Pichler Hefti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>At altitude, factors such as decreased barometric pressure, low temperatures, and acclimatization might affect lung function.</p><p>The effects of exposure and acclimatization to high-altitude on lung function were assessed in 39 subjects by repetitive spirometry up to 6022 m during a high-altitude expedition. Subjects were classified depending on the occurrence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) and summit success to evaluate whether lung function relates to successful climb and risk of developing AMS.</p><p>Peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased with progressive altitude (max. +20.2 %pred, +9.3 %pred, and +6.7 %pred, all p<0.05). Only PEF improved with acclimatization (BC1 vs. BC2, +7.2 %pred, p=0.044). At altitude FEV1 (p=0.008) and PEF (p<0.001) were lower in the AMS group.</p><p>The risk of developing AMS was associated with lower baseline PEF (p<0.001) and longitudinal changes in PEF (p=0.008) and FEV1 (p<0.001). Lung function was not related to summit success (7126 m). Improvement in PEF after acclimatization might indicate respiratory muscle adaptation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"330 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824001113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824001113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lung function parameters are associated with acute mountain sickness and are improved at high and extreme altitude
At altitude, factors such as decreased barometric pressure, low temperatures, and acclimatization might affect lung function.
The effects of exposure and acclimatization to high-altitude on lung function were assessed in 39 subjects by repetitive spirometry up to 6022 m during a high-altitude expedition. Subjects were classified depending on the occurrence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) and summit success to evaluate whether lung function relates to successful climb and risk of developing AMS.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased with progressive altitude (max. +20.2 %pred, +9.3 %pred, and +6.7 %pred, all p<0.05). Only PEF improved with acclimatization (BC1 vs. BC2, +7.2 %pred, p=0.044). At altitude FEV1 (p=0.008) and PEF (p<0.001) were lower in the AMS group.
The risk of developing AMS was associated with lower baseline PEF (p<0.001) and longitudinal changes in PEF (p=0.008) and FEV1 (p<0.001). Lung function was not related to summit success (7126 m). Improvement in PEF after acclimatization might indicate respiratory muscle adaptation.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense.
Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as:
-Mechanics of breathing-
Gas exchange and acid-base balance-
Respiration at rest and exercise-
Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen-
Embryonic and adult respiration-
Comparative respiratory physiology.
Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.