按 MELD 亚型划分的意向治疗生存率差异:为终末期肝病创建的所有模型都不尽相同。

IF 26.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Craig Rosenstengle, Marina Serper, Sumeet K Asrani, Therese Bittermann, Jinyu Du, Tsung-Wei Ma, David Goldberg, Pere Gines, Patrick S Kamath
{"title":"按 MELD 亚型划分的意向治疗生存率差异:为终末期肝病创建的所有模型都不尽相同。","authors":"Craig Rosenstengle, Marina Serper, Sumeet K Asrani, Therese Bittermann, Jinyu Du, Tsung-Wei Ma, David Goldberg, Pere Gines, Patrick S Kamath","doi":"10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Kidney dysfunction is a major determinant of prognosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting transplantation. We hypothesized that for identical model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores at listing, outcomes before and after liver transplantation may vary if the predominant driver of the MELD score is serum creatinine (Cr) vs. serum bilirubin (Br) or international normalized ratio (INR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated all adult patients registered for liver transplantation (LT) between 2016-2020 and excluded patients receiving MELD exceptions or undergoing dual organ transplantation. Using K-Means clustering analysis, we classified each patient as MELD-Br, MELD-INR or MELD-Cr depending on the dominant variable for their MELD score. The primary outcome was intent-to-treat (ITT) survival, defined as survival within 1 year from listing with or without LT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MELD scores of LT waitlist registrants were clustered into three subtypes: MELD-Br (n = 13,658), MELD-INR (n = 13,809), and MELD-Cr (n = 12,412). One-year ITT survival rates were 78% (MELD-Br), 75% (MELD-INR), and 65% (MELD-Cr), p <0.01. ITT survival was lower for each MELD subtype for females compared to males (e.g. MELD-Cr: 63% females vs. 67% males, p <0.0001). The MELD-Cr subtype had the highest MELD at listing (MELD-Cr 23.4 vs. MELD-Br 19.2 vs. MELD-INR 21.0) and the largest decline in MELD over 3 months (23% vs. 12% vs. 21%). In adjusted analyses including MELD-Na, MELD-Cr was associated with higher waitlist mortality (hazard ratio 1.339, 95% CI 1.279-1.402) and lower LT rates (hazard ratio 0.688, 95% CI 0.664-0.713) compaed to the other subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For equivalent listing practices, registrants with the MELD-Cr subtype have lower ITT survival. MELD subtype may serve as a more sophisticated variable for dynamic assessment of mortality risk and to guide organ allocation.</p><p><strong>Impact and implications: </strong>The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is an excellent predictor of waitlist mortality; however, our work highlights that the driver of a patient's MELD score matters and particularly those driven by elevated creatinine are associated with lower 1-year intent-to-treat survival. The 1-year intent-to-treat survival is also lower for women compared to men within the Cr-dominant subtype. These results are important for physicians and patients undergoing LT evaluation as creatinine may serve as a marker of prognosis and even if creatinine levels improve the prognosis remains poor, necessitating discussion about alternative pathways for transplant. Our work also highlights that the type of kidney injury matters, in that those with acute kidney injury were more likely to die or remain on the waitlist than those with chronic kidney disease within the creatinine-dominant subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":15888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":26.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in intention-to-treat survival by MELD subtypes: All models created for end-stage liver disease are not equal.\",\"authors\":\"Craig Rosenstengle, Marina Serper, Sumeet K Asrani, Therese Bittermann, Jinyu Du, Tsung-Wei Ma, David Goldberg, Pere Gines, Patrick S Kamath\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Kidney dysfunction is a major determinant of prognosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting transplantation. We hypothesized that for identical model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores at listing, outcomes before and after liver transplantation may vary if the predominant driver of the MELD score is serum creatinine (Cr) vs. serum bilirubin (Br) or international normalized ratio (INR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated all adult patients registered for liver transplantation (LT) between 2016-2020 and excluded patients receiving MELD exceptions or undergoing dual organ transplantation. Using K-Means clustering analysis, we classified each patient as MELD-Br, MELD-INR or MELD-Cr depending on the dominant variable for their MELD score. The primary outcome was intent-to-treat (ITT) survival, defined as survival within 1 year from listing with or without LT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MELD scores of LT waitlist registrants were clustered into three subtypes: MELD-Br (n = 13,658), MELD-INR (n = 13,809), and MELD-Cr (n = 12,412). One-year ITT survival rates were 78% (MELD-Br), 75% (MELD-INR), and 65% (MELD-Cr), p <0.01. ITT survival was lower for each MELD subtype for females compared to males (e.g. MELD-Cr: 63% females vs. 67% males, p <0.0001). The MELD-Cr subtype had the highest MELD at listing (MELD-Cr 23.4 vs. MELD-Br 19.2 vs. MELD-INR 21.0) and the largest decline in MELD over 3 months (23% vs. 12% vs. 21%). In adjusted analyses including MELD-Na, MELD-Cr was associated with higher waitlist mortality (hazard ratio 1.339, 95% CI 1.279-1.402) and lower LT rates (hazard ratio 0.688, 95% CI 0.664-0.713) compaed to the other subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For equivalent listing practices, registrants with the MELD-Cr subtype have lower ITT survival. MELD subtype may serve as a more sophisticated variable for dynamic assessment of mortality risk and to guide organ allocation.</p><p><strong>Impact and implications: </strong>The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is an excellent predictor of waitlist mortality; however, our work highlights that the driver of a patient's MELD score matters and particularly those driven by elevated creatinine are associated with lower 1-year intent-to-treat survival. The 1-year intent-to-treat survival is also lower for women compared to men within the Cr-dominant subtype. These results are important for physicians and patients undergoing LT evaluation as creatinine may serve as a marker of prognosis and even if creatinine levels improve the prognosis remains poor, necessitating discussion about alternative pathways for transplant. Our work also highlights that the type of kidney injury matters, in that those with acute kidney injury were more likely to die or remain on the waitlist than those with chronic kidney disease within the creatinine-dominant subtype.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":26.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:肾功能障碍是失代偿期肝硬化患者等待移植的预后的主要决定因素。我们假设,如果 MELD 评分的主要驱动因素是血清肌酐而不是血清胆红素或 INR,那么对于上市时相同的 MELD 评分,肝移植前后的预后可能会有所不同:我们评估了2016-2020年间登记接受肝移植(LT)的所有成年患者,并排除了接受MELD例外或接受双器官移植的患者。通过K-Means聚类分析,我们根据患者MELD评分的主要变量将其分为MELD-Br、MELD-INR或MELD-Cr。主要结果是意向治疗存活率,定义为接受或不接受LT治疗后1年内的存活率:结果:LT 候选者的 MELD 评分分为 3 个亚型:MELD-Br(13658人)、MELD-INR(13809人)和MELD-Cr(12412人)。一年 ITT 存活率分别为 78%(MELD-Br)、75%(MELD-INR)和 65%(MELD-Cr):在相同的列表实践中,MELD-Cr亚型的注册者ITT生存率较低。MELD 亚型可作为动态评估死亡风险的更复杂变量,为器官分配模型提供信息:MELD评分是候补名单死亡率的绝佳预测指标;然而,我们的工作突出表明,患者MELD评分的驱动因素很重要,尤其是肌酐升高导致的患者1年ITT死亡率较低。在 Cr 主导亚型中,女性的 1 年 ITT 死亡率也低于男性。这些结果对接受 LT 评估的医生和患者非常重要,因为肌酐可作为预后的标志物,即使肌酐有所改善,预后仍然很差,因此有必要讨论其他移植途径。我们的研究还强调了肾损伤类型的重要性,因为与肌酐显性亚型的 CKD 患者相比,AKI 患者更有可能死亡或留在候选名单上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in intention-to-treat survival by MELD subtypes: All models created for end-stage liver disease are not equal.

Background & aims: Kidney dysfunction is a major determinant of prognosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting transplantation. We hypothesized that for identical model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores at listing, outcomes before and after liver transplantation may vary if the predominant driver of the MELD score is serum creatinine (Cr) vs. serum bilirubin (Br) or international normalized ratio (INR).

Methods: We evaluated all adult patients registered for liver transplantation (LT) between 2016-2020 and excluded patients receiving MELD exceptions or undergoing dual organ transplantation. Using K-Means clustering analysis, we classified each patient as MELD-Br, MELD-INR or MELD-Cr depending on the dominant variable for their MELD score. The primary outcome was intent-to-treat (ITT) survival, defined as survival within 1 year from listing with or without LT.

Results: MELD scores of LT waitlist registrants were clustered into three subtypes: MELD-Br (n = 13,658), MELD-INR (n = 13,809), and MELD-Cr (n = 12,412). One-year ITT survival rates were 78% (MELD-Br), 75% (MELD-INR), and 65% (MELD-Cr), p <0.01. ITT survival was lower for each MELD subtype for females compared to males (e.g. MELD-Cr: 63% females vs. 67% males, p <0.0001). The MELD-Cr subtype had the highest MELD at listing (MELD-Cr 23.4 vs. MELD-Br 19.2 vs. MELD-INR 21.0) and the largest decline in MELD over 3 months (23% vs. 12% vs. 21%). In adjusted analyses including MELD-Na, MELD-Cr was associated with higher waitlist mortality (hazard ratio 1.339, 95% CI 1.279-1.402) and lower LT rates (hazard ratio 0.688, 95% CI 0.664-0.713) compaed to the other subtypes.

Conclusions: For equivalent listing practices, registrants with the MELD-Cr subtype have lower ITT survival. MELD subtype may serve as a more sophisticated variable for dynamic assessment of mortality risk and to guide organ allocation.

Impact and implications: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is an excellent predictor of waitlist mortality; however, our work highlights that the driver of a patient's MELD score matters and particularly those driven by elevated creatinine are associated with lower 1-year intent-to-treat survival. The 1-year intent-to-treat survival is also lower for women compared to men within the Cr-dominant subtype. These results are important for physicians and patients undergoing LT evaluation as creatinine may serve as a marker of prognosis and even if creatinine levels improve the prognosis remains poor, necessitating discussion about alternative pathways for transplant. Our work also highlights that the type of kidney injury matters, in that those with acute kidney injury were more likely to die or remain on the waitlist than those with chronic kidney disease within the creatinine-dominant subtype.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepatology
Journal of Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
46.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2325
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepatology is the official publication of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It is dedicated to presenting clinical and basic research in the field of hepatology through original papers, reviews, case reports, and letters to the Editor. The Journal is published in English and may consider supplements that pass an editorial review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信