Lianru Zang, Kaihao Gu, Tuo Zhou, Peng Si, Xingkai Ji, Hao Zhang, Shengjie Yan, Xiaomei Wu
{"title":"研究脉冲场消融参数与消融结果之间的关系。","authors":"Lianru Zang, Kaihao Gu, Tuo Zhou, Peng Si, Xingkai Ji, Hao Zhang, Shengjie Yan, Xiaomei Wu","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01872-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablation method. The primary challenge is the control of multiple parameters in PFA, as the interplay of these parameters remains unclear in terms of ensuring effective and safe tissue ablation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study employs the response surface method (RSM) to explore the interactions between various PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and seeks to enhance the efficacy and safety of PFA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In vivo experiments were conducted using rabbit liver for varying PFA parameters: pulse amplitude (PA), pulse interval (PI), number of pulse trains (NT), and number of pulses in a pulse train (NP). Ablation outcomes assessed included three ablation sizes, surface temperature, and muscle contraction strength. Additionally, histological analysis was performed on the ablated tissue. We analyzed the relationship between PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and results were then compared with those from a simulation using an electric-thermal coupling PFA finite element model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A linear relationship between ablation outcomes and PFA parameters was established. PA and NT exhibited extremely significant (P < 0.0001) and significant effects (P < 0.05) on all ablation outcomes, respectively. NP showed an extremely significant impact (P < 0.0001) on surface temperature and muscle contraction strength, while PI significantly influenced (P < 0.05) muscle contraction strength alone. Histological analysis revealed that PFA produces controlled, well-defined areas of liver tissue necrosis. Surface temperature results from simulations and experiments were highly consistent (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study clarifies the relationship between various PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and aims to improve the efficacy and safety of PFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigate the relationship between pulsed field ablation parameters and ablation outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Lianru Zang, Kaihao Gu, Tuo Zhou, Peng Si, Xingkai Ji, Hao Zhang, Shengjie Yan, Xiaomei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01872-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablation method. The primary challenge is the control of multiple parameters in PFA, as the interplay of these parameters remains unclear in terms of ensuring effective and safe tissue ablation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study employs the response surface method (RSM) to explore the interactions between various PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and seeks to enhance the efficacy and safety of PFA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In vivo experiments were conducted using rabbit liver for varying PFA parameters: pulse amplitude (PA), pulse interval (PI), number of pulse trains (NT), and number of pulses in a pulse train (NP). Ablation outcomes assessed included three ablation sizes, surface temperature, and muscle contraction strength. Additionally, histological analysis was performed on the ablated tissue. We analyzed the relationship between PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and results were then compared with those from a simulation using an electric-thermal coupling PFA finite element model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A linear relationship between ablation outcomes and PFA parameters was established. PA and NT exhibited extremely significant (P < 0.0001) and significant effects (P < 0.05) on all ablation outcomes, respectively. NP showed an extremely significant impact (P < 0.0001) on surface temperature and muscle contraction strength, while PI significantly influenced (P < 0.05) muscle contraction strength alone. Histological analysis revealed that PFA produces controlled, well-defined areas of liver tissue necrosis. Surface temperature results from simulations and experiments were highly consistent (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study clarifies the relationship between various PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and aims to improve the efficacy and safety of PFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01872-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01872-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigate the relationship between pulsed field ablation parameters and ablation outcomes.
Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablation method. The primary challenge is the control of multiple parameters in PFA, as the interplay of these parameters remains unclear in terms of ensuring effective and safe tissue ablation.
Purpose: This study employs the response surface method (RSM) to explore the interactions between various PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and seeks to enhance the efficacy and safety of PFA.
Methods: In vivo experiments were conducted using rabbit liver for varying PFA parameters: pulse amplitude (PA), pulse interval (PI), number of pulse trains (NT), and number of pulses in a pulse train (NP). Ablation outcomes assessed included three ablation sizes, surface temperature, and muscle contraction strength. Additionally, histological analysis was performed on the ablated tissue. We analyzed the relationship between PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and results were then compared with those from a simulation using an electric-thermal coupling PFA finite element model.
Results: A linear relationship between ablation outcomes and PFA parameters was established. PA and NT exhibited extremely significant (P < 0.0001) and significant effects (P < 0.05) on all ablation outcomes, respectively. NP showed an extremely significant impact (P < 0.0001) on surface temperature and muscle contraction strength, while PI significantly influenced (P < 0.05) muscle contraction strength alone. Histological analysis revealed that PFA produces controlled, well-defined areas of liver tissue necrosis. Surface temperature results from simulations and experiments were highly consistent (R2 > 0.97).
Conclusions: This study clarifies the relationship between various PFA parameters and ablation outcomes, and aims to improve the efficacy and safety of PFA.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
