确定肝硬化和静脉曲张出血患者 TIPS 术后门静脉压力梯度的最佳测量时机和血液动力学目标:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 26.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yong Lv, Qiuhe Wang, Bohan Luo, Wei Bai, Menghao Li, Kai Li, Zhengyu Wang, Dongdong Xia, Wengang Guo, Xiaomei Li, Jie Yuan, Na Zhang, Xing Wang, Huahong Xie, Yanglin Pan, Yongzhan Nie, Zhanxin Yin, Daiming Fan, Guohong Han
{"title":"确定肝硬化和静脉曲张出血患者 TIPS 术后门静脉压力梯度的最佳测量时机和血液动力学目标:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Yong Lv, Qiuhe Wang, Bohan Luo, Wei Bai, Menghao Li, Kai Li, Zhengyu Wang, Dongdong Xia, Wengang Guo, Xiaomei Li, Jie Yuan, Na Zhang, Xing Wang, Huahong Xie, Yanglin Pan, Yongzhan Nie, Zhanxin Yin, Daiming Fan, Guohong Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the ideal moment for hemodynamic measurements and the optimal target of PPG in patients undergoing covered TIPS for variceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2018 and December 2021, 466 consecutive patients with recurrent variceal bleeding treated with covered TIPS were prospectively included. Post-TIPS PPG was measured immediately (immediate PPG), 24-72 hours (early PPG), and again 1 month (late PPG) after TIPS placement. The agreement among PPGs measured at different time points was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The unadjusted and confounder-adjusted effects of PPGs on clinical outcomes (portal hypertensive complications [PHCs], overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], further decompensation, and death) were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between early PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.34) was better than that between immediate PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.23, p <0.001). Early PPG revealed an excellent predictive value for PHCs (early PPG≥ vs. <12 mmHg: adjusted hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.55, p = 0.002) and OHE (0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, p = 0.030), while immediate PPG did not. Late PPG showed a predictive value for PHC risk but not OHE. By targeting the lowest risk of further decompensation, we identified an optimal hemodynamic target with early PPG ranging from 11 to 14 mmHg that was associated with a decreased risk of OHE and effective prevention of PHC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPG measured 24 to 72 hours after TIPS correlates with long-term PPG and clinical outcomes, and a hemodynamic target PPG of 11-14 mmHg is associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Impact and implications: </strong>The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remain unclear. Here we show that post-TIPS PPG measured at least 24 hours but not immediately after the procedure correlated with long-term PPG and clinical events. Thus, PPG measurements taken at least 24 hours after TIPS should be used to guide decision making in order to improve clinical outcomes. Targeting a post-TIPS PPG of 11-14 mmHg or a 20%-50% relative reduction from pre-TIPS baseline measured 24-72 hours after the procedure was associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy. Thus, these criteria could be used to guide TIPS creation and revision in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding undergoing covered TIPS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03590288.</p>","PeriodicalId":15888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":26.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the optimal measurement timing and hemodynamic targets of portal pressure gradient after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Lv, Qiuhe Wang, Bohan Luo, Wei Bai, Menghao Li, Kai Li, Zhengyu Wang, Dongdong Xia, Wengang Guo, Xiaomei Li, Jie Yuan, Na Zhang, Xing Wang, Huahong Xie, Yanglin Pan, Yongzhan Nie, Zhanxin Yin, Daiming Fan, Guohong Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the ideal moment for hemodynamic measurements and the optimal target of PPG in patients undergoing covered TIPS for variceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2018 and December 2021, 466 consecutive patients with recurrent variceal bleeding treated with covered TIPS were prospectively included. Post-TIPS PPG was measured immediately (immediate PPG), 24-72 hours (early PPG), and again 1 month (late PPG) after TIPS placement. The agreement among PPGs measured at different time points was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The unadjusted and confounder-adjusted effects of PPGs on clinical outcomes (portal hypertensive complications [PHCs], overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], further decompensation, and death) were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between early PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.34) was better than that between immediate PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.23, p <0.001). Early PPG revealed an excellent predictive value for PHCs (early PPG≥ vs. <12 mmHg: adjusted hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.55, p = 0.002) and OHE (0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, p = 0.030), while immediate PPG did not. Late PPG showed a predictive value for PHC risk but not OHE. By targeting the lowest risk of further decompensation, we identified an optimal hemodynamic target with early PPG ranging from 11 to 14 mmHg that was associated with a decreased risk of OHE and effective prevention of PHC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPG measured 24 to 72 hours after TIPS correlates with long-term PPG and clinical outcomes, and a hemodynamic target PPG of 11-14 mmHg is associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Impact and implications: </strong>The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remain unclear. Here we show that post-TIPS PPG measured at least 24 hours but not immediately after the procedure correlated with long-term PPG and clinical events. Thus, PPG measurements taken at least 24 hours after TIPS should be used to guide decision making in order to improve clinical outcomes. Targeting a post-TIPS PPG of 11-14 mmHg or a 20%-50% relative reduction from pre-TIPS baseline measured 24-72 hours after the procedure was associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy. Thus, these criteria could be used to guide TIPS creation and revision in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding undergoing covered TIPS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03590288.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":26.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:TIPS术后测量门腔压力梯度(PPG)的最佳时机和血流动力学目标仍无定论。本研究旨在确定因静脉曲张出血而接受覆盖式 TIPS 的患者进行血流动力学测量的理想时机和 PPG 的最佳目标:在 2018 年 5 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,前瞻性地纳入了 466 例连续接受覆盖式 TIPS 治疗的复发性静脉曲张出血患者。分别在 TIPS 置入后立即(即时 PPG)、24-72 小时(早期 PPG)和 1 个月(晚期 PPG)测量 TIPS 置入后的 PPG。通过类内相关系数 (ICC) 和 Bland-Altman 法评估了不同时间点测量的 PPG 之间的一致性。使用 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险回归模型评估了 PPG 对临床结果(门静脉高压并发症 [PHC]、明显肝性脑病 [OHE]、进一步失代偿和死亡)的未调整和混杂因素调整效应:结果:早期 PPG 与晚期 PPG 之间的一致性(ICC:0.34)优于即时 PPG 与晚期 PPG 之间的一致性(ICC:0.23,p=0.05):0.23,p结论:TIPS术后24至72小时测量的PPG与长期PPG和临床结果相关,PPG为11-14 mmHg的血液动力学目标可减少脑病,但不会影响临床疗效:经颈静脉肝内门体系统分流术(TIPS)后测量门腔压力梯度(PPG)的最佳时机和血液动力学目标仍无定论。我们在此表明,TIPS 术后至少 24 小时而非术后立即测量的 PPG 与长期 PPG 和临床事件相关,因此应该用于决策,以改善临床预后。术后 24-72 小时测量的 TIPS 术后 PPG 目标值为 11-14 mmHg 或较 TIPS 术前基线相对降低 20%-50%,可减少脑病的发生,但不会影响临床疗效,因此可用于指导接受覆盖式 TIPS 的肝硬化和静脉曲张出血患者的 TIPS 创建和修正:临床试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:临床试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT03590288。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying the optimal measurement timing and hemodynamic targets of portal pressure gradient after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding.

Background & aims: The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the ideal moment for hemodynamic measurements and the optimal target of PPG in patients undergoing covered TIPS for variceal bleeding.

Methods: Between May 2018 and December 2021, 466 consecutive patients with recurrent variceal bleeding treated with covered TIPS were prospectively included. Post-TIPS PPG was measured immediately (immediate PPG), 24-72 hours (early PPG), and again 1 month (late PPG) after TIPS placement. The agreement among PPGs measured at different time points was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The unadjusted and confounder-adjusted effects of PPGs on clinical outcomes (portal hypertensive complications [PHCs], overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], further decompensation, and death) were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models.

Results: The agreement between early PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.34) was better than that between immediate PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.23, p <0.001). Early PPG revealed an excellent predictive value for PHCs (early PPG≥ vs. <12 mmHg: adjusted hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.55, p = 0.002) and OHE (0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, p = 0.030), while immediate PPG did not. Late PPG showed a predictive value for PHC risk but not OHE. By targeting the lowest risk of further decompensation, we identified an optimal hemodynamic target with early PPG ranging from 11 to 14 mmHg that was associated with a decreased risk of OHE and effective prevention of PHC.

Conclusions: PPG measured 24 to 72 hours after TIPS correlates with long-term PPG and clinical outcomes, and a hemodynamic target PPG of 11-14 mmHg is associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy.

Impact and implications: The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remain unclear. Here we show that post-TIPS PPG measured at least 24 hours but not immediately after the procedure correlated with long-term PPG and clinical events. Thus, PPG measurements taken at least 24 hours after TIPS should be used to guide decision making in order to improve clinical outcomes. Targeting a post-TIPS PPG of 11-14 mmHg or a 20%-50% relative reduction from pre-TIPS baseline measured 24-72 hours after the procedure was associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy. Thus, these criteria could be used to guide TIPS creation and revision in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding undergoing covered TIPS.

Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03590288.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepatology
Journal of Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
46.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2325
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepatology is the official publication of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It is dedicated to presenting clinical and basic research in the field of hepatology through original papers, reviews, case reports, and letters to the Editor. The Journal is published in English and may consider supplements that pass an editorial review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信