急性心力衰竭住院患者过早使用依普利酮引发的不良事件。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"急性心力衰竭住院患者过早使用依普利酮引发的不良事件。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The guidelines recommend the initiation or up-titration of heart failure (HF) treatments following an HF hospitalization; however, concerns about adverse events may limit the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patient profiles or disease severity might impact adverse events associated with MRA therapy in acute HF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The EARLIER trial included patients with acute HF who were randomized to eplerenone or placebo over 6 months. Adverse events (<em>i.e.</em>, worsening renal function [WRF], hyperkalemia, hypotension, and volume depletion/dehydration) were assessed. HF-related outcome included a composite of all-cause mortality, HF re-hospitalization, investigator-reported worsening HF and out-of-hospital diuretic intensification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 297 patients (mean age: 67 ± 13 years; 73% males), adverse events were observed: 44.4% experienced WRF (&gt;20% drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate[eGFR] and/or investigator-reported WRF), 8.4% had hyperkalemia (potassium &gt;5.5 mmol/L and/or investigator-reported hyperkalemia), 27.9% experienced hypotension (systolic blood pressure[SBP] &lt;90 mmHg and/or investigator-reported hypotension), and 16.8% had investigator-reported volume depletion/dehydration. Eplerenone <em>vs.</em> placebo did not elevate the incidence of these events (all-<em>p</em>-values&gt;0.0 5). Multivariable analyses revealed that, irrespective of treatment allocation, older age (&gt;7 5 years), prevalent diabetes, symptomatic congestion, and microalbuminuria were associated with increased risk of WRF. Baseline eGFR&lt;60 ml/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> and SBP &lt; 90 mmHg predicted hyperkalemia and hypotension, respectively, while older patients were more likely to experience volume depletion/dehydration. However, these patient profiles did not alter the benefit of eplerenone on outcomes (HR [9 5%CI] = 0.53 [0.29 to 0.97], <em>P</em> = 0.04; all-p-for-interaction&gt;0.10).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Eplerenone did not increase adverse events compared with placebo in acute HF. Importantly, disease severity and comorbidity burden greatly influence adverse events, but not benefit from eplerenone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events associated with early initiation of Eplerenone in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The guidelines recommend the initiation or up-titration of heart failure (HF) treatments following an HF hospitalization; however, concerns about adverse events may limit the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patient profiles or disease severity might impact adverse events associated with MRA therapy in acute HF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The EARLIER trial included patients with acute HF who were randomized to eplerenone or placebo over 6 months. Adverse events (<em>i.e.</em>, worsening renal function [WRF], hyperkalemia, hypotension, and volume depletion/dehydration) were assessed. HF-related outcome included a composite of all-cause mortality, HF re-hospitalization, investigator-reported worsening HF and out-of-hospital diuretic intensification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 297 patients (mean age: 67 ± 13 years; 73% males), adverse events were observed: 44.4% experienced WRF (&gt;20% drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate[eGFR] and/or investigator-reported WRF), 8.4% had hyperkalemia (potassium &gt;5.5 mmol/L and/or investigator-reported hyperkalemia), 27.9% experienced hypotension (systolic blood pressure[SBP] &lt;90 mmHg and/or investigator-reported hypotension), and 16.8% had investigator-reported volume depletion/dehydration. Eplerenone <em>vs.</em> placebo did not elevate the incidence of these events (all-<em>p</em>-values&gt;0.0 5). Multivariable analyses revealed that, irrespective of treatment allocation, older age (&gt;7 5 years), prevalent diabetes, symptomatic congestion, and microalbuminuria were associated with increased risk of WRF. Baseline eGFR&lt;60 ml/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> and SBP &lt; 90 mmHg predicted hyperkalemia and hypotension, respectively, while older patients were more likely to experience volume depletion/dehydration. However, these patient profiles did not alter the benefit of eplerenone on outcomes (HR [9 5%CI] = 0.53 [0.29 to 0.97], <em>P</em> = 0.04; all-p-for-interaction&gt;0.10).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Eplerenone did not increase adverse events compared with placebo in acute HF. Importantly, disease severity and comorbidity burden greatly influence adverse events, but not benefit from eplerenone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324010994\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324010994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:指南建议在急性心力衰竭(HF)住院治疗后开始或升级心力衰竭(HF)治疗;然而,对不良事件的担忧可能会限制矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)的使用。患者情况或疾病严重程度可能会影响急性心力衰竭患者接受 MRA 治疗时发生的不良事件:EARLIER 试验纳入了急性高血压患者,他们在 6 个月内随机接受依普利酮或安慰剂治疗。对不良事件(即肾功能恶化[WRF]、高钾血症、低血压和容量耗竭/脱水)进行了评估。与心房颤动相关的结果包括全因死亡率、心房颤动再住院、研究者报告的心房颤动恶化和院外利尿剂强化的综合结果:在 297 名患者(平均年龄:67 ± 13 岁;73% 为男性)中观察到了不良事件:44.4%的患者出现WRF(估计肾小球滤过率[eGFR]下降>20%和/或研究者报告的WRF),8.4%的患者出现高钾血症(血钾>5.5 mmol/L和/或研究者报告的高钾血症),27.9%的患者出现低血压(收缩压[SBP]0.0 5)。多变量分析显示,无论治疗分配如何,年龄较大(>7 5 岁)、糖尿病流行、无症状充血和微量白蛋白尿都与 WRF 风险增加有关。结论:依普利酮不会增加 WRF 的不良反应:与安慰剂相比,依普利酮不会增加急性心房颤动患者的不良事件。重要的是,疾病严重程度和合并症负担对不良事件有很大影响,但对依普利酮的获益没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse events associated with early initiation of Eplerenone in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure

Background

The guidelines recommend the initiation or up-titration of heart failure (HF) treatments following an HF hospitalization; however, concerns about adverse events may limit the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patient profiles or disease severity might impact adverse events associated with MRA therapy in acute HF.

Methods

The EARLIER trial included patients with acute HF who were randomized to eplerenone or placebo over 6 months. Adverse events (i.e., worsening renal function [WRF], hyperkalemia, hypotension, and volume depletion/dehydration) were assessed. HF-related outcome included a composite of all-cause mortality, HF re-hospitalization, investigator-reported worsening HF and out-of-hospital diuretic intensification.

Results

In 297 patients (mean age: 67 ± 13 years; 73% males), adverse events were observed: 44.4% experienced WRF (>20% drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate[eGFR] and/or investigator-reported WRF), 8.4% had hyperkalemia (potassium >5.5 mmol/L and/or investigator-reported hyperkalemia), 27.9% experienced hypotension (systolic blood pressure[SBP] <90 mmHg and/or investigator-reported hypotension), and 16.8% had investigator-reported volume depletion/dehydration. Eplerenone vs. placebo did not elevate the incidence of these events (all-p-values>0.0 5). Multivariable analyses revealed that, irrespective of treatment allocation, older age (>7 5 years), prevalent diabetes, symptomatic congestion, and microalbuminuria were associated with increased risk of WRF. Baseline eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2 and SBP < 90 mmHg predicted hyperkalemia and hypotension, respectively, while older patients were more likely to experience volume depletion/dehydration. However, these patient profiles did not alter the benefit of eplerenone on outcomes (HR [9 5%CI] = 0.53 [0.29 to 0.97], P = 0.04; all-p-for-interaction>0.10).

Conclusion

Eplerenone did not increase adverse events compared with placebo in acute HF. Importantly, disease severity and comorbidity burden greatly influence adverse events, but not benefit from eplerenone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信