常规飞秒激光白内障手术中基于文丘里和蠕动的超声乳化效率比较。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Rachel A Scott, Caleb J Holtmeyer, Travis M Parker, Wendell J Scott, Randall J Olson
{"title":"常规飞秒激光白内障手术中基于文丘里和蠕动的超声乳化效率比较。","authors":"Rachel A Scott, Caleb J Holtmeyer, Travis M Parker, Wendell J Scott, Randall J Olson","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficiency of venturi and peristaltic pump phacoemulsification systems in patients undergoing routine laser cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single center, nonrandomized clinical study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study compared consecutive eyes with moderate nuclear sclerosis undergoing routine laser cataract surgery at the Outpatient Eye Center, Mercy Health System, Springfield, MO, USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each surgery used the same femtosecond laser settings. Surgeries were performed with either a venturi or peristaltic vacuum system by a single surgeon (WJS). The EFX, percent power, ultrasound time (UST), the total time that the phaco tip was in the eye (phaco tip in/out time, PIOT), and the surgery time (speculum in/out time) were recorded. Exclusions and intraoperative complications were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>995 eyes were included in the study. The EFX in the venturi eyes (1.7 ± 1.3; n = 521) compared to peristaltic eyes (2.1 ± 1.4; n = 474) was lower (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the UST in the eyes performed with the venturi system versus the peristaltic system was reduced (32.4 ± 22.3 s vs 40.7± 25.7 s; p < 0.0001). The PIOT in the venturi group compared to the peristaltic group was less (71.1 ± 31.1 sec vs 79.1 ± 36.1 s; p = 0.0002). The case time (speculum in/out time) was lower for the venturi eyes (307.2 ± 68.8 s vs. 311.6 ± 53.6 s; p = 0.268).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In eyes undergoing routine laser cataract surgery, the use of the venturi pump system was more efficient compared to the peristaltic pump system based on energy use and time, and there was no significant difference in complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of venturi and peristaltic based phacoemulsification efficiency in routine femtosecond laser cataract surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel A Scott, Caleb J Holtmeyer, Travis M Parker, Wendell J Scott, Randall J Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficiency of venturi and peristaltic pump phacoemulsification systems in patients undergoing routine laser cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single center, nonrandomized clinical study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study compared consecutive eyes with moderate nuclear sclerosis undergoing routine laser cataract surgery at the Outpatient Eye Center, Mercy Health System, Springfield, MO, USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each surgery used the same femtosecond laser settings. Surgeries were performed with either a venturi or peristaltic vacuum system by a single surgeon (WJS). The EFX, percent power, ultrasound time (UST), the total time that the phaco tip was in the eye (phaco tip in/out time, PIOT), and the surgery time (speculum in/out time) were recorded. Exclusions and intraoperative complications were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>995 eyes were included in the study. The EFX in the venturi eyes (1.7 ± 1.3; n = 521) compared to peristaltic eyes (2.1 ± 1.4; n = 474) was lower (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the UST in the eyes performed with the venturi system versus the peristaltic system was reduced (32.4 ± 22.3 s vs 40.7± 25.7 s; p < 0.0001). The PIOT in the venturi group compared to the peristaltic group was less (71.1 ± 31.1 sec vs 79.1 ± 36.1 s; p = 0.0002). The case time (speculum in/out time) was lower for the venturi eyes (307.2 ± 68.8 s vs. 311.6 ± 53.6 s; p = 0.268).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In eyes undergoing routine laser cataract surgery, the use of the venturi pump system was more efficient compared to the peristaltic pump system based on energy use and time, and there was no significant difference in complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.07.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.07.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较文丘里泵和蠕动泵乳化系统在常规激光白内障手术患者中的效率:比较常规激光白内障手术患者使用文丘里泵和蠕动泵超声乳化系统的效率:单中心、非随机临床研究:该研究比较了在美国密苏里州斯普林菲尔德市 Mercy Health System 眼科门诊中心接受常规激光白内障手术的连续中度核硬化症患者:每次手术都使用相同的飞秒激光设置。手术由一名外科医生(WJS)使用文丘里真空系统或蠕动真空系统完成。记录了EFX、功率百分比、超声时间(UST)、phaco刀尖在眼球内的总时间(phaco刀尖进出时间,PIOT)和手术时间(窥器进出时间)。此外,还对排除病例和术中并发症进行了分析:研究共纳入 995 只眼睛。文丘里眼的 EFX(1.7 ± 1.3;n = 521)低于蠕动眼(2.1 ± 1.4;n = 474)(p < 0.0001)。同样,与蠕动系统相比,使用文丘里系统的眼球的 UST 缩短(32.4 ± 22.3 秒 vs 40.7 ± 25.7 秒;p < 0.0001)。与蠕动组相比,文丘里组的 PIOT 更短(71.1 ± 31.1 秒 vs 79.1 ± 36.1 秒;p = 0.0002)。文丘里组眼睛的手术时间(窥视器进出时间)更短(307.2 ± 68.8 秒 vs 311.6 ± 53.6 秒;p = 0.268):结论:在接受常规激光白内障手术的眼睛中,根据能量消耗和时间计算,使用文丘里泵系统比蠕动泵系统更有效率,并发症方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of venturi and peristaltic based phacoemulsification efficiency in routine femtosecond laser cataract surgery.

Objective: To compare the efficiency of venturi and peristaltic pump phacoemulsification systems in patients undergoing routine laser cataract surgery.

Design: Single center, nonrandomized clinical study.

Participants: The study compared consecutive eyes with moderate nuclear sclerosis undergoing routine laser cataract surgery at the Outpatient Eye Center, Mercy Health System, Springfield, MO, USA.

Methods: Each surgery used the same femtosecond laser settings. Surgeries were performed with either a venturi or peristaltic vacuum system by a single surgeon (WJS). The EFX, percent power, ultrasound time (UST), the total time that the phaco tip was in the eye (phaco tip in/out time, PIOT), and the surgery time (speculum in/out time) were recorded. Exclusions and intraoperative complications were also analyzed.

Results: 995 eyes were included in the study. The EFX in the venturi eyes (1.7 ± 1.3; n = 521) compared to peristaltic eyes (2.1 ± 1.4; n = 474) was lower (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the UST in the eyes performed with the venturi system versus the peristaltic system was reduced (32.4 ± 22.3 s vs 40.7± 25.7 s; p < 0.0001). The PIOT in the venturi group compared to the peristaltic group was less (71.1 ± 31.1 sec vs 79.1 ± 36.1 s; p = 0.0002). The case time (speculum in/out time) was lower for the venturi eyes (307.2 ± 68.8 s vs. 311.6 ± 53.6 s; p = 0.268).

Conclusion: In eyes undergoing routine laser cataract surgery, the use of the venturi pump system was more efficient compared to the peristaltic pump system based on energy use and time, and there was no significant difference in complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信