期刊推荐的系统综述和荟萃分析指南。

IF 5.2 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1002/ase.2500

Adam B. Wilson, Boon Huat Bay, Jessica N. Byram, Melissa A. Carroll, Gabrielle M. Finn, Niels Hammer, Sabine Hildebrandt, Claudia Krebs, Jonathan J. Wisco, Jason M. Organ

{"title":"期刊推荐的系统综述和荟萃分析指南。","authors":"Adam B. Wilson, Boon Huat Bay, Jessica N. Byram, Melissa A. Carroll, Gabrielle M. Finn, Niels Hammer, Sabine Hildebrandt, Claudia Krebs, Jonathan J. Wisco, Jason M. Organ","doi":"10.1002/ase.2500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"17 7","pages":"1392-1395"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.2500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses\",\"authors\":\"Adam B. Wilson, Boon Huat Bay, Jessica N. Byram, Melissa A. Carroll, Gabrielle M. Finn, Niels Hammer, Sabine Hildebrandt, Claudia Krebs, Jonathan J. Wisco, Jason M. Organ\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.2500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"1392-1395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.2500\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2500\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

系统综述和荟萃分析汇总了不同研究和人群的研究结果，是一种宝贵的研究证据形式。在过去十年中，使用这些方法进行的医学教育研究增加了 630%。然而，由于计划不周和分析不足，许多手稿并不适合发表。这些指南旨在提高报告方法和结果的清晰度和全面性，确保高质量和可比性。它们与 PRISMA 等现有标准保持一致，提供了范例和最佳实践。遵守这些指南对《解剖科学教育》的发表至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-

CiteScore

10.30

自引率

39.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.