Saarim Yasin Aslam , Tiago Zortea , Paul Salkovskis
{"title":"恐慌症的认知理论:系统性叙事回顾","authors":"Saarim Yasin Aslam , Tiago Zortea , Paul Salkovskis","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The cognitive theory of panic disorder proposes that individuals with panic disorder have a relatively enduring tendency to catastrophically misinterpret bodily sensations resulting in panic attacks.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We investigated whether the evidence is consistent with the theory and its predictions, if updates are required and sought to identify future research considerations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL (1986 to July 2024). Inclusion criteria were studies collecting quantitative data derived from panic disorder patients, testing one of the predictions and using appropriate outcome measures. Exclusion criteria were non-English language publications, all participants under the age of 18 and studies that were not published in a peer-reviewed journal. Quality was assessed using ‘QualSyst’ and synthesis was based on each prediction tested. PROPSERO registration #CRD42022332211.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>53 studies were identified amongst 49 publications. There was substantial evidence for all predictions. Three studies did not support the prediction tested and none were inconsistent.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Most studies were ‘medium’ in quality and were predominately from female samples.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings are consistent with the theory and its predictions. Higher quality research is needed and implications for future research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102483"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001041/pdfft?md5=2b5e8c0e5da3a800e3a3cccc30c4bb7d&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001041-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cognitive theory of panic disorder: A systematic narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Saarim Yasin Aslam , Tiago Zortea , Paul Salkovskis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The cognitive theory of panic disorder proposes that individuals with panic disorder have a relatively enduring tendency to catastrophically misinterpret bodily sensations resulting in panic attacks.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We investigated whether the evidence is consistent with the theory and its predictions, if updates are required and sought to identify future research considerations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL (1986 to July 2024). Inclusion criteria were studies collecting quantitative data derived from panic disorder patients, testing one of the predictions and using appropriate outcome measures. Exclusion criteria were non-English language publications, all participants under the age of 18 and studies that were not published in a peer-reviewed journal. Quality was assessed using ‘QualSyst’ and synthesis was based on each prediction tested. PROPSERO registration #CRD42022332211.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>53 studies were identified amongst 49 publications. There was substantial evidence for all predictions. Three studies did not support the prediction tested and none were inconsistent.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Most studies were ‘medium’ in quality and were predominately from female samples.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings are consistent with the theory and its predictions. Higher quality research is needed and implications for future research are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001041/pdfft?md5=2b5e8c0e5da3a800e3a3cccc30c4bb7d&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001041-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The cognitive theory of panic disorder: A systematic narrative review
Background
The cognitive theory of panic disorder proposes that individuals with panic disorder have a relatively enduring tendency to catastrophically misinterpret bodily sensations resulting in panic attacks.
Aims
We investigated whether the evidence is consistent with the theory and its predictions, if updates are required and sought to identify future research considerations.
Methods
We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL (1986 to July 2024). Inclusion criteria were studies collecting quantitative data derived from panic disorder patients, testing one of the predictions and using appropriate outcome measures. Exclusion criteria were non-English language publications, all participants under the age of 18 and studies that were not published in a peer-reviewed journal. Quality was assessed using ‘QualSyst’ and synthesis was based on each prediction tested. PROPSERO registration #CRD42022332211.
Results
53 studies were identified amongst 49 publications. There was substantial evidence for all predictions. Three studies did not support the prediction tested and none were inconsistent.
Limitations
Most studies were ‘medium’ in quality and were predominately from female samples.
Conclusions
Findings are consistent with the theory and its predictions. Higher quality research is needed and implications for future research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.