促进包容性创业的制度性推动因素的配置:模糊集定性比较分析

IF 15.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Aaron A. Vargas-Zeledon , Su-Yol Lee
{"title":"促进包容性创业的制度性推动因素的配置:模糊集定性比较分析","authors":"Aaron A. Vargas-Zeledon ,&nbsp;Su-Yol Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inclusive entrepreneurship, which represents an integrated approach to entrepreneurship and social inclusion, has increasingly received attention for its expected capacity to simultaneously foster economic growth and mitigate inequality. This study examines how the configuration of institutional enablers, which encompass several characteristics involving markets, finance, policy, education, and knowledge, fosters inclusive entrepreneurship outcomes. The results of a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis using 69 country cases indicate that institutional enablers—excluding market openness—jointly affect inclusive entrepreneurship outcomes. This study provides evidence that such effects vary depending on the level of a country's economic development. As one of the first to explore the topic of inclusive entrepreneurship, this study has significant implications for academics, practitioners, and policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2400088X/pdfft?md5=1717137e8b54df98634c0ee0c3cbcf43&pid=1-s2.0-S2444569X2400088X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Configurations of institutional enablers that foster inclusive entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aaron A. Vargas-Zeledon ,&nbsp;Su-Yol Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Inclusive entrepreneurship, which represents an integrated approach to entrepreneurship and social inclusion, has increasingly received attention for its expected capacity to simultaneously foster economic growth and mitigate inequality. This study examines how the configuration of institutional enablers, which encompass several characteristics involving markets, finance, policy, education, and knowledge, fosters inclusive entrepreneurship outcomes. The results of a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis using 69 country cases indicate that institutional enablers—excluding market openness—jointly affect inclusive entrepreneurship outcomes. This study provides evidence that such effects vary depending on the level of a country's economic development. As one of the first to explore the topic of inclusive entrepreneurship, this study has significant implications for academics, practitioners, and policymakers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2400088X/pdfft?md5=1717137e8b54df98634c0ee0c3cbcf43&pid=1-s2.0-S2444569X2400088X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2400088X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2400088X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包容性创业是创业与社会包容的综合方法,因其同时促进经济增长和减少不平等的预期能力而日益受到关注。本研究探讨了制度促进因素(包括市场、金融、政策、教育和知识等方面的若干特征)的配置如何促进包容性创业的成果。使用 69 个国家案例进行模糊集定性比较分析的结果表明,制度促进因素(不包括市场开放性)共同影响着包容性创业的结果。本研究提供的证据表明,这种影响因国家的经济发展水平而异。作为最早探讨包容性创业这一主题的研究之一,本研究对学术界、从业者和政策制定者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Configurations of institutional enablers that foster inclusive entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

Inclusive entrepreneurship, which represents an integrated approach to entrepreneurship and social inclusion, has increasingly received attention for its expected capacity to simultaneously foster economic growth and mitigate inequality. This study examines how the configuration of institutional enablers, which encompass several characteristics involving markets, finance, policy, education, and knowledge, fosters inclusive entrepreneurship outcomes. The results of a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis using 69 country cases indicate that institutional enablers—excluding market openness—jointly affect inclusive entrepreneurship outcomes. This study provides evidence that such effects vary depending on the level of a country's economic development. As one of the first to explore the topic of inclusive entrepreneurship, this study has significant implications for academics, practitioners, and policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信