双侧前庭病 - 丧失前庭功能和情感体验

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
C. Lahmann , M. Dieterich , S. Becker-Bense , G. Schmid-Mühlbauer
{"title":"双侧前庭病 - 丧失前庭功能和情感体验","authors":"C. Lahmann ,&nbsp;M. Dieterich ,&nbsp;S. Becker-Bense ,&nbsp;G. Schmid-Mühlbauer","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The vestibular system is closely connected to emotion-processing neuronal circuits. Patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP), a chronic loss of vestibular function, show remarkably lower rates of psychiatric comorbidities and vertigo-related anxiety (VRA) than those with episodic vertigo/dizziness (v/d). This study aimed to evaluate whether patients with BVP differ from those with episodic v/d in terms of VRA, general anxiety, and cognitions about body and health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study involved a subsample of 202 patients with episodic v/d (i.e., vestibular migraine, vestibular paroxysmia, or Menière's disease) and 43 patients with BVP. All patients underwent standardised neurological/neurotological examinations, structured clinical interviews (SCID-I), and self-report questionnaires, such as the Vertigo Handicap Questionnaire (VHQ), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Trait Anxiety from the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T), and Cognitions About Body and Health questionnaire (CABAH). Non-parametric tests were used for analysis. Due to multiple testing, the significance level was set at <em>p</em> ≤ .008.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with episodic v/d exhibited higher VRA levels than those with BVP. However, this difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = .04; <em>r</em> = 0.15, small effect). Additionally, patients with BVP reported more catastrophizing cognitions (<em>p</em> &lt; .001; <em>r</em> = 0.25, small effect) and bodily weakness (<em>p</em> = .003; <em>r</em> = 0.22, small effect) compared to those with episodic v/d. There were no differences in general anxiety levels (BAI and STAI-T) between patients with v/d and those with BVP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with episodic v/d and BVP differed in their appraisal (cognition). The difference in VRA (subjective feeling) was not statistically significant. These preliminary results are discussed using a component approach to emotions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 111894"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003064/pdfft?md5=fe9a7534299f0230ce466761f149073c&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924003064-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilateral vestibulopathy – Loss of vestibular function and experience of emotions\",\"authors\":\"C. Lahmann ,&nbsp;M. Dieterich ,&nbsp;S. Becker-Bense ,&nbsp;G. Schmid-Mühlbauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The vestibular system is closely connected to emotion-processing neuronal circuits. Patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP), a chronic loss of vestibular function, show remarkably lower rates of psychiatric comorbidities and vertigo-related anxiety (VRA) than those with episodic vertigo/dizziness (v/d). This study aimed to evaluate whether patients with BVP differ from those with episodic v/d in terms of VRA, general anxiety, and cognitions about body and health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study involved a subsample of 202 patients with episodic v/d (i.e., vestibular migraine, vestibular paroxysmia, or Menière's disease) and 43 patients with BVP. All patients underwent standardised neurological/neurotological examinations, structured clinical interviews (SCID-I), and self-report questionnaires, such as the Vertigo Handicap Questionnaire (VHQ), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Trait Anxiety from the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T), and Cognitions About Body and Health questionnaire (CABAH). Non-parametric tests were used for analysis. Due to multiple testing, the significance level was set at <em>p</em> ≤ .008.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with episodic v/d exhibited higher VRA levels than those with BVP. However, this difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = .04; <em>r</em> = 0.15, small effect). Additionally, patients with BVP reported more catastrophizing cognitions (<em>p</em> &lt; .001; <em>r</em> = 0.25, small effect) and bodily weakness (<em>p</em> = .003; <em>r</em> = 0.22, small effect) compared to those with episodic v/d. There were no differences in general anxiety levels (BAI and STAI-T) between patients with v/d and those with BVP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with episodic v/d and BVP differed in their appraisal (cognition). The difference in VRA (subjective feeling) was not statistically significant. These preliminary results are discussed using a component approach to emotions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003064/pdfft?md5=fe9a7534299f0230ce466761f149073c&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924003064-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前庭系统与情绪处理神经元回路密切相关。双侧前庭大腺病(BVP)是一种慢性前庭功能丧失,与发作性眩晕/头晕(v/d)患者相比,双侧前庭大腺病患者的精神疾病合并症和眩晕相关焦虑(VRA)发生率明显较低。本研究旨在评估在眩晕相关焦虑、一般焦虑以及对身体和健康的认知方面,BVP 患者与发作性眩晕/头晕患者是否存在差异。方法这项横断面研究涉及 202 名发作性眩晕/头晕(即前庭性偏头痛、前庭阵发性痛或梅尼埃病)患者和 43 名 BVP 患者。所有患者均接受了标准化的神经学/神经病学检查、结构化临床访谈(SCID-I)和自我报告问卷,如眩晕障碍问卷(VHQ)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、国家-特质-焦虑量表(STAI-T)中的特质焦虑以及身体与健康认知问卷(CABAH)。分析采用非参数检验。结果发作性 v/d 患者的 VRA 水平高于 BVP 患者。然而,这一差异并无统计学意义(p = 0.04;r = 0.15,影响较小)。此外,与发作性 v/d 患者相比,BVP 患者报告了更多的灾难化认知(p < .001; r = 0.25,小效应)和身体虚弱(p = .003; r = 0.22,小效应)。结论发作性 v/d 和 BVP 患者在评价(认知)方面存在差异。VRA(主观感觉)的差异在统计学上并不显著。本文采用情绪成分法对这些初步结果进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bilateral vestibulopathy – Loss of vestibular function and experience of emotions

Objective

The vestibular system is closely connected to emotion-processing neuronal circuits. Patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP), a chronic loss of vestibular function, show remarkably lower rates of psychiatric comorbidities and vertigo-related anxiety (VRA) than those with episodic vertigo/dizziness (v/d). This study aimed to evaluate whether patients with BVP differ from those with episodic v/d in terms of VRA, general anxiety, and cognitions about body and health.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved a subsample of 202 patients with episodic v/d (i.e., vestibular migraine, vestibular paroxysmia, or Menière's disease) and 43 patients with BVP. All patients underwent standardised neurological/neurotological examinations, structured clinical interviews (SCID-I), and self-report questionnaires, such as the Vertigo Handicap Questionnaire (VHQ), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Trait Anxiety from the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T), and Cognitions About Body and Health questionnaire (CABAH). Non-parametric tests were used for analysis. Due to multiple testing, the significance level was set at p ≤ .008.

Results

Patients with episodic v/d exhibited higher VRA levels than those with BVP. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = .04; r = 0.15, small effect). Additionally, patients with BVP reported more catastrophizing cognitions (p < .001; r = 0.25, small effect) and bodily weakness (p = .003; r = 0.22, small effect) compared to those with episodic v/d. There were no differences in general anxiety levels (BAI and STAI-T) between patients with v/d and those with BVP.

Conclusion

Patients with episodic v/d and BVP differed in their appraisal (cognition). The difference in VRA (subjective feeling) was not statistically significant. These preliminary results are discussed using a component approach to emotions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信