Wenwen Zhu , He Gai , Yuxin Liu , Min Zhang , Kun Li
{"title":"以自然为基础的堤岸保护措施改善了农业主导流域溪流中的底栖大型无脊椎动物","authors":"Wenwen Zhu , He Gai , Yuxin Liu , Min Zhang , Kun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increased bank erosion is one of the most significant threats to agricultural stream ecosystems. However, it is challenging to ascertain whether bank restoration measures positively affect in-stream habitats and aquatic communities. This study evaluated three nature-based bank protection measures' short-term (2-year) effects on aquatic physical habitat quality and benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a headwater stream in agricultural areas. The results demonstrate that nature-based bank protection measures can significantly improve the quality of aquatic physical habitat in streams. The TPRW (timber piles + riprap + willow cuttings) and WTRW (waste tires + riprap + willow cuttings) measures exhibited the most pronounced improvement in the quality of aquatic physical habitat in streams. The diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates was the highest in the TPRW reach, and the seasons significantly affected the density of benthic macroinvertebrates. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Margalef's richness index were the most consistent with the changing trend of physical habitat quality and are effective indicators of the ecological effects of stream restoration measures in our study area. In this study area, TPRW is the preferred measure for streambank restoration of agricultural streams, and WTRW is the alternative measure. However, the ecological effects of WTRW need to be monitored over a more extended period to identify whether there is potential ecotoxicity in the process of weathering and decomposition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature-based bank protection measures improve benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream draining an agriculturally dominated watershed\",\"authors\":\"Wenwen Zhu , He Gai , Yuxin Liu , Min Zhang , Kun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Increased bank erosion is one of the most significant threats to agricultural stream ecosystems. However, it is challenging to ascertain whether bank restoration measures positively affect in-stream habitats and aquatic communities. This study evaluated three nature-based bank protection measures' short-term (2-year) effects on aquatic physical habitat quality and benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a headwater stream in agricultural areas. The results demonstrate that nature-based bank protection measures can significantly improve the quality of aquatic physical habitat in streams. The TPRW (timber piles + riprap + willow cuttings) and WTRW (waste tires + riprap + willow cuttings) measures exhibited the most pronounced improvement in the quality of aquatic physical habitat in streams. The diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates was the highest in the TPRW reach, and the seasons significantly affected the density of benthic macroinvertebrates. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Margalef's richness index were the most consistent with the changing trend of physical habitat quality and are effective indicators of the ecological effects of stream restoration measures in our study area. In this study area, TPRW is the preferred measure for streambank restoration of agricultural streams, and WTRW is the alternative measure. However, the ecological effects of WTRW need to be monitored over a more extended period to identify whether there is potential ecotoxicity in the process of weathering and decomposition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nature-based bank protection measures improve benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream draining an agriculturally dominated watershed
Increased bank erosion is one of the most significant threats to agricultural stream ecosystems. However, it is challenging to ascertain whether bank restoration measures positively affect in-stream habitats and aquatic communities. This study evaluated three nature-based bank protection measures' short-term (2-year) effects on aquatic physical habitat quality and benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a headwater stream in agricultural areas. The results demonstrate that nature-based bank protection measures can significantly improve the quality of aquatic physical habitat in streams. The TPRW (timber piles + riprap + willow cuttings) and WTRW (waste tires + riprap + willow cuttings) measures exhibited the most pronounced improvement in the quality of aquatic physical habitat in streams. The diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates was the highest in the TPRW reach, and the seasons significantly affected the density of benthic macroinvertebrates. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Margalef's richness index were the most consistent with the changing trend of physical habitat quality and are effective indicators of the ecological effects of stream restoration measures in our study area. In this study area, TPRW is the preferred measure for streambank restoration of agricultural streams, and WTRW is the alternative measure. However, the ecological effects of WTRW need to be monitored over a more extended period to identify whether there is potential ecotoxicity in the process of weathering and decomposition.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.