加纳出现 COVID-19 症状的患者同时感染 SARS-CoV-2 与呼吸道合胞病毒和人类甲型流感:回顾性研究

IF 2.9 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kwabena Obeng Duedu , Jones Gyamfi , Reuben Ayivor-Djanie , Godknows Afenya , Isaac Buertey Agbuglah , Hubert Kwame Agbogli , Priscilla Essandoh , Seraphine Kugbemanya , Theophilus Koku Adiku
{"title":"加纳出现 COVID-19 症状的患者同时感染 SARS-CoV-2 与呼吸道合胞病毒和人类甲型流感:回顾性研究","authors":"Kwabena Obeng Duedu ,&nbsp;Jones Gyamfi ,&nbsp;Reuben Ayivor-Djanie ,&nbsp;Godknows Afenya ,&nbsp;Isaac Buertey Agbuglah ,&nbsp;Hubert Kwame Agbogli ,&nbsp;Priscilla Essandoh ,&nbsp;Seraphine Kugbemanya ,&nbsp;Theophilus Koku Adiku","doi":"10.1016/j.nmni.2024.101463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic the aetiology of respiratory illnesses were narrowed to SARS-CoV-2. This prevented diagnosis of other pathogens and patients were not notified of the accurate diagnosis of their illnesses when SARS-CoV-2 was absent. It is therefore important to look back and determine what else was present but was missed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This retrospective study sought to gain insights into prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A alongside SARS-CoV-2 in patients who reported with clinical symptoms of respiratory illnesses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Samples from patients who had reported of respiratory symptoms were selected at random from a pool. RNA was extracted and RT-PCR was performed for SARS-CoV-2, RSV and Influenza A in parallel. Data on the clinical symptoms was extracted from case-base forms and analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 400 symptomatic samples tested, prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and RSV was 20.3 %, 2.0 % and 0.5 % respectively. Only one sample tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A. About 77 % of the symptomatic cases did not test positive for any of the three agents. Cough (79 %) was the most common symptom followed by fever and chills, headache, sore throat and runny nose.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The large proportion of symptomatic cases that tested negative for all three respiratory viruses raises a flag and a need for more investigations into the actual burden of respiratory aetiologic agents during the pandemic. With the low levels of co-infections, parallel testing may not be needed however, a strong case for multiplex tests for respiratory agents exists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38074,"journal":{"name":"New Microbes and New Infections","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524002476/pdfft?md5=7ba1704c1e9541b36c366fd098a88b50&pid=1-s2.0-S2052297524002476-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-infections of SARS-CoV-2 with respiratory syncytial virus and human influenza A in patients with symptoms of COVID-19 in Ghana: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Kwabena Obeng Duedu ,&nbsp;Jones Gyamfi ,&nbsp;Reuben Ayivor-Djanie ,&nbsp;Godknows Afenya ,&nbsp;Isaac Buertey Agbuglah ,&nbsp;Hubert Kwame Agbogli ,&nbsp;Priscilla Essandoh ,&nbsp;Seraphine Kugbemanya ,&nbsp;Theophilus Koku Adiku\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nmni.2024.101463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic the aetiology of respiratory illnesses were narrowed to SARS-CoV-2. This prevented diagnosis of other pathogens and patients were not notified of the accurate diagnosis of their illnesses when SARS-CoV-2 was absent. It is therefore important to look back and determine what else was present but was missed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This retrospective study sought to gain insights into prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A alongside SARS-CoV-2 in patients who reported with clinical symptoms of respiratory illnesses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Samples from patients who had reported of respiratory symptoms were selected at random from a pool. RNA was extracted and RT-PCR was performed for SARS-CoV-2, RSV and Influenza A in parallel. Data on the clinical symptoms was extracted from case-base forms and analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 400 symptomatic samples tested, prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and RSV was 20.3 %, 2.0 % and 0.5 % respectively. Only one sample tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A. About 77 % of the symptomatic cases did not test positive for any of the three agents. Cough (79 %) was the most common symptom followed by fever and chills, headache, sore throat and runny nose.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The large proportion of symptomatic cases that tested negative for all three respiratory viruses raises a flag and a need for more investigations into the actual burden of respiratory aetiologic agents during the pandemic. With the low levels of co-infections, parallel testing may not be needed however, a strong case for multiplex tests for respiratory agents exists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Microbes and New Infections\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524002476/pdfft?md5=7ba1704c1e9541b36c366fd098a88b50&pid=1-s2.0-S2052297524002476-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Microbes and New Infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524002476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbes and New Infections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524002476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在 COVID-19 大流行期间,呼吸道疾病的病原体被缩小到 SARS-CoV-2。这就妨碍了对其他病原体的诊断,当 SARS-CoV-2 不存在时,患者并没有被告知其疾病的准确诊断。本回顾性研究旨在了解在报告有呼吸道疾病临床症状的患者中,除 SARS-CoV-2 外,呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 和甲型流感的流行情况。提取 RNA 并同时对 SARS-CoV-2、RSV 和甲型流感进行 RT-PCR 检测。结果 在检测的 400 份有症状的样本中,SARS-CoV-2、甲型流感和 RSV 的流行率分别为 20.3%、2.0% 和 0.5%。只有一个样本对 SARS-CoV-2 和甲型流感检测呈阳性。咳嗽(79%)是最常见的症状,其次是发烧和发冷、头痛、喉咙痛和流鼻涕。由于合并感染率较低,因此可能不需要进行平行检测,但有充分理由对呼吸道病原体进行多重检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-infections of SARS-CoV-2 with respiratory syncytial virus and human influenza A in patients with symptoms of COVID-19 in Ghana: A retrospective study

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic the aetiology of respiratory illnesses were narrowed to SARS-CoV-2. This prevented diagnosis of other pathogens and patients were not notified of the accurate diagnosis of their illnesses when SARS-CoV-2 was absent. It is therefore important to look back and determine what else was present but was missed.

Objective

This retrospective study sought to gain insights into prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A alongside SARS-CoV-2 in patients who reported with clinical symptoms of respiratory illnesses.

Methods

Samples from patients who had reported of respiratory symptoms were selected at random from a pool. RNA was extracted and RT-PCR was performed for SARS-CoV-2, RSV and Influenza A in parallel. Data on the clinical symptoms was extracted from case-base forms and analysed.

Results

Of the 400 symptomatic samples tested, prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and RSV was 20.3 %, 2.0 % and 0.5 % respectively. Only one sample tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A. About 77 % of the symptomatic cases did not test positive for any of the three agents. Cough (79 %) was the most common symptom followed by fever and chills, headache, sore throat and runny nose.

Conclusion

The large proportion of symptomatic cases that tested negative for all three respiratory viruses raises a flag and a need for more investigations into the actual burden of respiratory aetiologic agents during the pandemic. With the low levels of co-infections, parallel testing may not be needed however, a strong case for multiplex tests for respiratory agents exists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbes and New Infections
New Microbes and New Infections Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
91
审稿时长
114 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信