功能性癫痫发作成人患者的认知行为疗法:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
{"title":"功能性癫痫发作成人患者的认知行为疗法:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) among adults with functional seizures (FS) have become increasingly available, prompting the opportunity to critically appraise the efficacy and safety of CBT in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis including RCTs comparing CBT in addition to standardized medical treatment (SMT) versus SMT alone for adults with FS. The primary outcome was seizure freedom at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life, anxiety and depression assessed via standardized clinical questionnaires.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three RCTs were included comprising 228 participants treated with CBT and 222 with SMT. The intervention was significantly associated with seizure freedom (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.98; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 3.46; p = 0.02; I2 = 0 %), reductions in anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.21; 95 % CI −0.41, −0.003; p = 0.047; I2 = 0 %) and improvements in quality of life (SMD 0.34; 95 % CI 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.003; I2 = 0 %) at the end of treatment. Conversely, no significant differences between groups were observed in depression symptoms (SMD −0.19; 95 % CI −0.39, 0.02; p = 0.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). There was no statistically significant increase in the risk of suicidal ideation and self-harm with CBT (OR 2.11; 95 % CI 0.81, 5.48; p = 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %) nor were there differences in terms of discontinuation rates during follow-up (OR 0.92; 95 % CI 0.49, 1.72; p = 0.79; I<sup>2</sup> = 7 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is high-quality evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of CBT in treating FS. Future research should investigate whether combining CBT with other therapeutic methods could potentially enhance treatment efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive behavioral therapy in adults with functional seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) among adults with functional seizures (FS) have become increasingly available, prompting the opportunity to critically appraise the efficacy and safety of CBT in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis including RCTs comparing CBT in addition to standardized medical treatment (SMT) versus SMT alone for adults with FS. The primary outcome was seizure freedom at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life, anxiety and depression assessed via standardized clinical questionnaires.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three RCTs were included comprising 228 participants treated with CBT and 222 with SMT. The intervention was significantly associated with seizure freedom (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.98; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 3.46; p = 0.02; I2 = 0 %), reductions in anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.21; 95 % CI −0.41, −0.003; p = 0.047; I2 = 0 %) and improvements in quality of life (SMD 0.34; 95 % CI 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.003; I2 = 0 %) at the end of treatment. Conversely, no significant differences between groups were observed in depression symptoms (SMD −0.19; 95 % CI −0.39, 0.02; p = 0.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). There was no statistically significant increase in the risk of suicidal ideation and self-harm with CBT (OR 2.11; 95 % CI 0.81, 5.48; p = 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %) nor were there differences in terms of discontinuation rates during follow-up (OR 0.92; 95 % CI 0.49, 1.72; p = 0.79; I<sup>2</sup> = 7 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is high-quality evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of CBT in treating FS. Future research should investigate whether combining CBT with other therapeutic methods could potentially enhance treatment efficacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024003627\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024003627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对功能性癫痫发作(FS)成人患者进行认知行为疗法(CBT)研究的随机对照临床试验(RCT)越来越多,这促使我们有机会对 CBT 在这一人群中的疗效和安全性进行严格评估。主要结果是治疗结束时无癫痫发作。次要结果包括通过标准化临床问卷评估的生活质量、焦虑和抑郁程度。干预与癫痫发作自由度(Odds Ratio [OR] 1.98; 95 % 置信区间 [CI] 1.14, 3.46; p = 0.02; I2 = 0 %)、焦虑减少(标准化平均差 [SMD] -0.21; 95 % CI -0.41, -0.003; p = 0.047; I2 = 0 %)和生活质量的改善(SMD 0.34; 95 % CI 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.003; I2 = 0 %)。相反,在抑郁症状方面,各组之间没有观察到明显差异(SMD -0.19; 95 % CI -0.39, 0.02; p = 0.08; I2 = 0 %)。采用 CBT 治疗后,自杀意念和自残的风险没有明显增加(OR 2.11; 95 % CI 0.81, 5.48; p = 0.13; I2 = 0 %),随访期间的中断率也没有差异(OR 0.92; 95 % CI 0.49, 1.72; p = 0.79; I2 = 7 %)。未来的研究应探讨将 CBT 与其他治疗方法相结合是否有可能提高疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive behavioral therapy in adults with functional seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) among adults with functional seizures (FS) have become increasingly available, prompting the opportunity to critically appraise the efficacy and safety of CBT in this population.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including RCTs comparing CBT in addition to standardized medical treatment (SMT) versus SMT alone for adults with FS. The primary outcome was seizure freedom at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life, anxiety and depression assessed via standardized clinical questionnaires.

Results

Three RCTs were included comprising 228 participants treated with CBT and 222 with SMT. The intervention was significantly associated with seizure freedom (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.98; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 3.46; p = 0.02; I2 = 0 %), reductions in anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.21; 95 % CI −0.41, −0.003; p = 0.047; I2 = 0 %) and improvements in quality of life (SMD 0.34; 95 % CI 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.003; I2 = 0 %) at the end of treatment. Conversely, no significant differences between groups were observed in depression symptoms (SMD −0.19; 95 % CI −0.39, 0.02; p = 0.08; I2 = 0 %). There was no statistically significant increase in the risk of suicidal ideation and self-harm with CBT (OR 2.11; 95 % CI 0.81, 5.48; p = 0.13; I2 = 0 %) nor were there differences in terms of discontinuation rates during follow-up (OR 0.92; 95 % CI 0.49, 1.72; p = 0.79; I2 = 7 %).

Conclusions

There is high-quality evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of CBT in treating FS. Future research should investigate whether combining CBT with other therapeutic methods could potentially enhance treatment efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信