以可持续性为导向,在混凝土中应用废钢和轮胎橡胶纤维作为加固材料:利用响应面法进行优化研究

M.A. Kareem , E.O. Ajadi , O.O. Fadipe , K. Ishola , O.A. Olawuyi , S.A. Ayanlere , O.J. Olatoyan , J.O. Adeosun , A.A. Adefajo , A.T. Oyewo , S.O.A. Olawale , W.A. Lamidi
{"title":"以可持续性为导向,在混凝土中应用废钢和轮胎橡胶纤维作为加固材料:利用响应面法进行优化研究","authors":"M.A. Kareem ,&nbsp;E.O. Ajadi ,&nbsp;O.O. Fadipe ,&nbsp;K. Ishola ,&nbsp;O.A. Olawuyi ,&nbsp;S.A. Ayanlere ,&nbsp;O.J. Olatoyan ,&nbsp;J.O. Adeosun ,&nbsp;A.A. Adefajo ,&nbsp;A.T. Oyewo ,&nbsp;S.O.A. Olawale ,&nbsp;W.A. Lamidi","doi":"10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Innovative use of waste materials has proven to be effective for improving concrete’s technical properties while eliminating the threat of environmental pollution. There is paucity of research regarding the combined use of Waste Steel Fibres (WSFs) and Waste Tire Rubber Fibres (WTRFs) in concrete. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of WSFs and WTRFs as reinforcement in concrete and determine their optimal fractions for enhancing the concrete strength properties using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). WSFs of 0.3-1.5% with a 0.6% increment and WTRFs of 0.3-1.5% with a 0.6% increment by concrete volume as reinforcement in concrete with water-to-cement ratio (W/C) of 0.25–0.65 with 0.2 increment were designed using the Box-Behnken Design of RSM. A total of fourteen (14) concrete mixes with a design strength of 25 N/mm<sup>2</sup> were prepared. The fresh and hardened properties (slump, density, water absorption, 7- and 28-day compressive and split tensile strengths) of concrete were determined using standard procedures. The RSM was used to evaluate the interaction between the concrete variables and identify their optimum combination which gave the peak values of responses. Furthermore, the characteristics and sustainability of the concrete under optimum variables were compared with that of the conventional concrete. The outcomes revealed that the inclusion of WSFs and WTRFs yielded concretes with maximum slump, density, water absorption and 28-day compressive and split tensile strengths of 25 mm, 2633 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, 5%, 41 N/mm<sup>2</sup> and 4.54 N/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The optimization technique showed the optimal variables combination which yielded the peak response values of WSFs (1.40%), WTRFs (0.66%) and W/C (0.54). The nominal variance with the absolute percent error of less than (9%) between the actual experimental verified results and predicted results for all the responses validates the predictability of the model. The split tensile strength and compressive strength increased by 28.33% and 48.85%, respectively at the optimum setpoint of variable with respect to the reference concrete. In addition, the WSFs and WTRFs-reinforced concrete exhibited lower embodied CO<sub>2</sub> emission but the embodied energy and cost are slightly higher relative to conventional concrete. Nevertheless, the embodied energy of the concrete was significantly lesser than that of concrete that used individual fibers for reinforcement. Thus, the enhancement of concrete strength properties with the prospect for sustainable fibre-reinforced concrete production through the use of waste steel and tyre rubber fibres is feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100958,"journal":{"name":"Next Materials","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949822824002429/pdfft?md5=98916c8f4737888dafbb875d16a99bae&pid=1-s2.0-S2949822824002429-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability-driven application of waste steel and tyre rubber fibres as reinforcement in concrete: An optimization study using response surface methodology\",\"authors\":\"M.A. Kareem ,&nbsp;E.O. Ajadi ,&nbsp;O.O. Fadipe ,&nbsp;K. Ishola ,&nbsp;O.A. Olawuyi ,&nbsp;S.A. Ayanlere ,&nbsp;O.J. Olatoyan ,&nbsp;J.O. Adeosun ,&nbsp;A.A. Adefajo ,&nbsp;A.T. Oyewo ,&nbsp;S.O.A. Olawale ,&nbsp;W.A. Lamidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Innovative use of waste materials has proven to be effective for improving concrete’s technical properties while eliminating the threat of environmental pollution. There is paucity of research regarding the combined use of Waste Steel Fibres (WSFs) and Waste Tire Rubber Fibres (WTRFs) in concrete. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of WSFs and WTRFs as reinforcement in concrete and determine their optimal fractions for enhancing the concrete strength properties using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). WSFs of 0.3-1.5% with a 0.6% increment and WTRFs of 0.3-1.5% with a 0.6% increment by concrete volume as reinforcement in concrete with water-to-cement ratio (W/C) of 0.25–0.65 with 0.2 increment were designed using the Box-Behnken Design of RSM. A total of fourteen (14) concrete mixes with a design strength of 25 N/mm<sup>2</sup> were prepared. The fresh and hardened properties (slump, density, water absorption, 7- and 28-day compressive and split tensile strengths) of concrete were determined using standard procedures. The RSM was used to evaluate the interaction between the concrete variables and identify their optimum combination which gave the peak values of responses. Furthermore, the characteristics and sustainability of the concrete under optimum variables were compared with that of the conventional concrete. The outcomes revealed that the inclusion of WSFs and WTRFs yielded concretes with maximum slump, density, water absorption and 28-day compressive and split tensile strengths of 25 mm, 2633 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, 5%, 41 N/mm<sup>2</sup> and 4.54 N/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The optimization technique showed the optimal variables combination which yielded the peak response values of WSFs (1.40%), WTRFs (0.66%) and W/C (0.54). The nominal variance with the absolute percent error of less than (9%) between the actual experimental verified results and predicted results for all the responses validates the predictability of the model. The split tensile strength and compressive strength increased by 28.33% and 48.85%, respectively at the optimum setpoint of variable with respect to the reference concrete. In addition, the WSFs and WTRFs-reinforced concrete exhibited lower embodied CO<sub>2</sub> emission but the embodied energy and cost are slightly higher relative to conventional concrete. Nevertheless, the embodied energy of the concrete was significantly lesser than that of concrete that used individual fibers for reinforcement. Thus, the enhancement of concrete strength properties with the prospect for sustainable fibre-reinforced concrete production through the use of waste steel and tyre rubber fibres is feasible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Next Materials\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949822824002429/pdfft?md5=98916c8f4737888dafbb875d16a99bae&pid=1-s2.0-S2949822824002429-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Next Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949822824002429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949822824002429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,创新使用废弃材料可以有效改善混凝土的技术性能,同时消除环境污染的威胁。关于在混凝土中结合使用废钢纤维(WSFs)和废轮胎橡胶纤维(WTRFs)的研究还很少。因此,本研究旨在调查 WSFs 和 WTRFs 作为混凝土加固材料的影响,并利用响应面法(RSM)确定它们在提高混凝土强度性能方面的最佳比例。在水灰比(W/C)为 0.25-0.65 且增量为 0.2 的混凝土中,采用 RSM 的箱-贝肯设计法设计了混凝土体积的 0.3-1.5%(增量为 0.6%)的 WSFs 和 0.3-1.5%(增量为 0.6%)的 WTRFs 作为配筋。共配制了十四(14)种设计强度为 25 牛顿/平方毫米的混凝土拌合物。混凝土的新鲜和硬化性能(坍落度、密度、吸水率、7 天和 28 天抗压强度以及劈裂拉伸强度)均采用标准程序进行测定。采用 RSM 方法评估了混凝土变量之间的相互作用,并确定了可产生峰值响应的最佳组合。此外,还将最佳变量下混凝土的特性和可持续性与传统混凝土进行了比较。结果显示,加入 WSFs 和 WTRFs 后,混凝土的最大坍落度、密度、吸水率以及 28 天抗压强度和劈裂拉伸强度分别为 25 mm、2633 kg/m3、5%、41 N/mm2 和 4.54 N/mm2。优化技术显示,最佳变量组合产生了 WSFs(1.40%)、WTRFs(0.66%)和 W/C (0.54)的峰值响应。所有响应的实际实验验证结果与预测结果之间的标称方差(绝对误差小于 9%)验证了模型的可预测性。与参考混凝土相比,在最佳变量设定点,劈裂抗拉强度和抗压强度分别提高了 28.33% 和 48.85%。此外,WSFs 和 WTRFs 增强混凝土的二氧化碳体现排放量较低,但体现能耗和成本略高于传统混凝土。不过,与使用单根纤维加固的混凝土相比,这些混凝土的内含能耗要低得多。因此,通过使用废旧钢纤维和轮胎橡胶纤维来提高混凝土强度性能并实现可持续纤维增强混凝土生产的前景是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability-driven application of waste steel and tyre rubber fibres as reinforcement in concrete: An optimization study using response surface methodology

Innovative use of waste materials has proven to be effective for improving concrete’s technical properties while eliminating the threat of environmental pollution. There is paucity of research regarding the combined use of Waste Steel Fibres (WSFs) and Waste Tire Rubber Fibres (WTRFs) in concrete. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of WSFs and WTRFs as reinforcement in concrete and determine their optimal fractions for enhancing the concrete strength properties using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). WSFs of 0.3-1.5% with a 0.6% increment and WTRFs of 0.3-1.5% with a 0.6% increment by concrete volume as reinforcement in concrete with water-to-cement ratio (W/C) of 0.25–0.65 with 0.2 increment were designed using the Box-Behnken Design of RSM. A total of fourteen (14) concrete mixes with a design strength of 25 N/mm2 were prepared. The fresh and hardened properties (slump, density, water absorption, 7- and 28-day compressive and split tensile strengths) of concrete were determined using standard procedures. The RSM was used to evaluate the interaction between the concrete variables and identify their optimum combination which gave the peak values of responses. Furthermore, the characteristics and sustainability of the concrete under optimum variables were compared with that of the conventional concrete. The outcomes revealed that the inclusion of WSFs and WTRFs yielded concretes with maximum slump, density, water absorption and 28-day compressive and split tensile strengths of 25 mm, 2633 kg/m3, 5%, 41 N/mm2 and 4.54 N/mm2, respectively. The optimization technique showed the optimal variables combination which yielded the peak response values of WSFs (1.40%), WTRFs (0.66%) and W/C (0.54). The nominal variance with the absolute percent error of less than (9%) between the actual experimental verified results and predicted results for all the responses validates the predictability of the model. The split tensile strength and compressive strength increased by 28.33% and 48.85%, respectively at the optimum setpoint of variable with respect to the reference concrete. In addition, the WSFs and WTRFs-reinforced concrete exhibited lower embodied CO2 emission but the embodied energy and cost are slightly higher relative to conventional concrete. Nevertheless, the embodied energy of the concrete was significantly lesser than that of concrete that used individual fibers for reinforcement. Thus, the enhancement of concrete strength properties with the prospect for sustainable fibre-reinforced concrete production through the use of waste steel and tyre rubber fibres is feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信