地区文化背景下的生活方式健康指数与 2020 年美国总统大选投票率之间的关系

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ross Arena , Nicolaas P. Pronk , Thomas E. Kottke , Anthony Arena , Colin Woodard
{"title":"地区文化背景下的生活方式健康指数与 2020 年美国总统大选投票率之间的关系","authors":"Ross Arena ,&nbsp;Nicolaas P. Pronk ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Kottke ,&nbsp;Anthony Arena ,&nbsp;Colin Woodard","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>There are numerous population health challenges confronting the United States (U.S.), including the unhealthy lifestyle – chronic disease pandemics. However, the impact of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and the increased prevalence of chronic diseases that result from them affect many facets of life outside of the health domain, and their scope remains under-appreciated. The current analysis contributes to addressing this knowledge gap by comparing the newly developed Lifestyle Health Index (LHI) to U.S. county-level voter turnout rates in the 2020 presidential election.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>County-level data on the LHI, percent voter turnout, and the American Nations regional cultures model schematic was used in the current analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pearson correlations between county-level LHI scores and sub scores and Democratic, Republican, and overall voter turnout were all statistically significant and of similar strength (<em>r</em> &gt; 0.63, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). All counties in the worst performing LHI quartile had a voter turnout &lt;60 %. Higher LHIs were consistently assocaited with lower voter turnout across the regional cultures, although heterogeneity was evident across the American Nations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A large percentage of the U.S. population is afflicted with poor health, and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a primary driver. Poor health does not occur in a vacuum and impacts many other facets of an individual's life. The current study further demonstrates the potential detrimental impact of poor health on civic engagement, specifically participation in the electoral process (i.e, citizens' health may influence voter turnout). Health care professionals and institutions in the U.S. should uniformly embrace the recent policy brief by the American College of Physicians on participation in the electoral process for patients receiving care. This paradigm shift has the potential to substantially improve voter turnout during U.S. elections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000715/pdfft?md5=cda00469c5066e1bbac7931d1aca98ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000715-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between the lifestyle health index and voter turnout during the 2020 United States presidential election in the context of regional cultures\",\"authors\":\"Ross Arena ,&nbsp;Nicolaas P. Pronk ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Kottke ,&nbsp;Anthony Arena ,&nbsp;Colin Woodard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>There are numerous population health challenges confronting the United States (U.S.), including the unhealthy lifestyle – chronic disease pandemics. However, the impact of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and the increased prevalence of chronic diseases that result from them affect many facets of life outside of the health domain, and their scope remains under-appreciated. The current analysis contributes to addressing this knowledge gap by comparing the newly developed Lifestyle Health Index (LHI) to U.S. county-level voter turnout rates in the 2020 presidential election.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>County-level data on the LHI, percent voter turnout, and the American Nations regional cultures model schematic was used in the current analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pearson correlations between county-level LHI scores and sub scores and Democratic, Republican, and overall voter turnout were all statistically significant and of similar strength (<em>r</em> &gt; 0.63, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). All counties in the worst performing LHI quartile had a voter turnout &lt;60 %. Higher LHIs were consistently assocaited with lower voter turnout across the regional cultures, although heterogeneity was evident across the American Nations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A large percentage of the U.S. population is afflicted with poor health, and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a primary driver. Poor health does not occur in a vacuum and impacts many other facets of an individual's life. The current study further demonstrates the potential detrimental impact of poor health on civic engagement, specifically participation in the electoral process (i.e, citizens' health may influence voter turnout). Health care professionals and institutions in the U.S. should uniformly embrace the recent policy brief by the American College of Physicians on participation in the electoral process for patients receiving care. This paradigm shift has the potential to substantially improve voter turnout during U.S. elections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000715/pdfft?md5=cda00469c5066e1bbac7931d1aca98ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000715-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标美国面临着许多人口健康挑战,包括不健康的生活方式--慢性病流行。然而,不健康生活方式行为的影响以及由此导致的慢性病发病率上升影响了健康领域以外的生活的许多方面,其范围仍未得到充分重视。目前的分析通过将新开发的生活方式健康指数(LHI)与美国县级 2020 年总统大选投票率进行比较,有助于填补这一知识空白。结果县级 LHI 分数和子分数与民主党、共和党和总投票率之间的皮尔逊相关性均具有统计学意义,且强度相似(r > 0.63, p < 0.001)。在 LHI 表现最差的四分位数中,所有县的投票率均为 <60%。在各地区文化中,较高的 LHI 始终与较低的投票率相关联,尽管在美洲各民族中存在明显的异质性。健康状况不佳并非发生在真空中,而是会影响个人生活的许多其他方面。当前的研究进一步表明,健康状况不佳对公民参与,特别是参与选举过程(即公民的健康状况可能会影响投票率)具有潜在的不利影响。美国的医疗保健专业人员和机构应该统一接受美国内科医师学会最近发布的关于接受治疗的病人参与选举过程的政策简报。这种模式的转变有可能大大提高美国大选期间的投票率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between the lifestyle health index and voter turnout during the 2020 United States presidential election in the context of regional cultures

Objectives

There are numerous population health challenges confronting the United States (U.S.), including the unhealthy lifestyle – chronic disease pandemics. However, the impact of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and the increased prevalence of chronic diseases that result from them affect many facets of life outside of the health domain, and their scope remains under-appreciated. The current analysis contributes to addressing this knowledge gap by comparing the newly developed Lifestyle Health Index (LHI) to U.S. county-level voter turnout rates in the 2020 presidential election.

Study design

Descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective analysis.

Methods

County-level data on the LHI, percent voter turnout, and the American Nations regional cultures model schematic was used in the current analysis.

Results

Pearson correlations between county-level LHI scores and sub scores and Democratic, Republican, and overall voter turnout were all statistically significant and of similar strength (r > 0.63, p < 0.001). All counties in the worst performing LHI quartile had a voter turnout <60 %. Higher LHIs were consistently assocaited with lower voter turnout across the regional cultures, although heterogeneity was evident across the American Nations.

Conclusions

A large percentage of the U.S. population is afflicted with poor health, and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a primary driver. Poor health does not occur in a vacuum and impacts many other facets of an individual's life. The current study further demonstrates the potential detrimental impact of poor health on civic engagement, specifically participation in the electoral process (i.e, citizens' health may influence voter turnout). Health care professionals and institutions in the U.S. should uniformly embrace the recent policy brief by the American College of Physicians on participation in the electoral process for patients receiving care. This paradigm shift has the potential to substantially improve voter turnout during U.S. elections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信