在 316L 不锈钢激光粉末床熔化中使用浆料替代干粉

IF 4.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
{"title":"在 316L 不锈钢激光粉末床熔化中使用浆料替代干粉","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a well-established additive manufacturing process for producing high-quality metal components with unparallelled design freedom. However, LPBF also has its limitations, including a limited materials palette, low productivity and high costs, mainly due to the expensive feedstock powders. These powders must meet highly stringent requirements regarding particle size (15–<span><math><mrow><mn>45</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>), particle size distribution (mono-modal) and morphology (spherical), which is achievable only through expensive gas- and plasma-atomised powders. This paper investigates slurry-LPBF as an alternative to conventional dry powder LPBF. The use of slurry removes some of the stringent powder requirements by allowing deposition of smaller particles with a variety of particle morphologies. Slurry-LPBF can therefore increase the useful yield of the atomisation process and expand the materials palette for LPBF, by enabling the use of powders for which atomised variants are not commercially available. This study used 316L stainless steel powder with an average particle size <span><math><mrow><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>18</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>. An existing slurry-LPBF machine was re-designed and re-built, allowing successful slurry processing. Two optimal parameter sets were obtained, resulting in component density of 99.4%. Tensile testing revealed an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 622 ± 2 MPa and an elongation at break of 66 ± 2%. These results are consistent, and fall within the range of reported values in literature for dry-powder LPBF, with the UTS being on the lower side of the range, whilst elongation at break being on the higher side.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380/pdfft?md5=5e6b605faf1666b404a4bcade4865925&pid=1-s2.0-S2772369024000380-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the use of slurry as an alternative to dry powder for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a well-established additive manufacturing process for producing high-quality metal components with unparallelled design freedom. However, LPBF also has its limitations, including a limited materials palette, low productivity and high costs, mainly due to the expensive feedstock powders. These powders must meet highly stringent requirements regarding particle size (15–<span><math><mrow><mn>45</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>), particle size distribution (mono-modal) and morphology (spherical), which is achievable only through expensive gas- and plasma-atomised powders. This paper investigates slurry-LPBF as an alternative to conventional dry powder LPBF. The use of slurry removes some of the stringent powder requirements by allowing deposition of smaller particles with a variety of particle morphologies. Slurry-LPBF can therefore increase the useful yield of the atomisation process and expand the materials palette for LPBF, by enabling the use of powders for which atomised variants are not commercially available. This study used 316L stainless steel powder with an average particle size <span><math><mrow><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>18</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>. An existing slurry-LPBF machine was re-designed and re-built, allowing successful slurry processing. Two optimal parameter sets were obtained, resulting in component density of 99.4%. Tensile testing revealed an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 622 ± 2 MPa and an elongation at break of 66 ± 2%. These results are consistent, and fall within the range of reported values in literature for dry-powder LPBF, with the UTS being on the lower side of the range, whilst elongation at break being on the higher side.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Additive manufacturing letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380/pdfft?md5=5e6b605faf1666b404a4bcade4865925&pid=1-s2.0-S2772369024000380-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Additive manufacturing letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激光粉末床熔融技术(LPBF)是一种成熟的增材制造工艺,可生产出具有无与伦比的设计自由度的高质量金属部件。然而,LPBF 也有其局限性,包括材料种类有限、生产率低和成本高,这主要是由于原料粉末价格昂贵。这些粉末必须满足对粒度(15-45μm)、粒度分布(单模态)和形态(球形)的严格要求,而这只有通过昂贵的气体和等离子体雾化粉末才能实现。本文研究了浆料-低压无卤聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料,作为传统干粉低压无卤聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料的替代品。浆料的使用允许沉积具有各种颗粒形态的较小颗粒,从而消除了对粉末的一些严格要求。因此,浆料低压喷射工艺可以提高雾化工艺的有用产量,并扩大低压喷射工艺的材料范围,可以使用市场上没有雾化变体的粉末。本研究使用了平均粒径为 18 微米的 316L 不锈钢粉末。对现有的浆料-LPBF 设备进行了重新设计和建造,使其能够成功地进行浆料处理。获得了两个最佳参数集,使成分密度达到 99.4%。拉伸测试显示,极限拉伸强度 (UTS) 为 622 ± 2 兆帕,断裂伸长率为 66 ± 2%。这些结果是一致的,属于干粉 LPBF 的文献报告值范围,其中 UTS 值偏低,而断裂伸长率偏高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the use of slurry as an alternative to dry powder for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a well-established additive manufacturing process for producing high-quality metal components with unparallelled design freedom. However, LPBF also has its limitations, including a limited materials palette, low productivity and high costs, mainly due to the expensive feedstock powders. These powders must meet highly stringent requirements regarding particle size (15–45μm), particle size distribution (mono-modal) and morphology (spherical), which is achievable only through expensive gas- and plasma-atomised powders. This paper investigates slurry-LPBF as an alternative to conventional dry powder LPBF. The use of slurry removes some of the stringent powder requirements by allowing deposition of smaller particles with a variety of particle morphologies. Slurry-LPBF can therefore increase the useful yield of the atomisation process and expand the materials palette for LPBF, by enabling the use of powders for which atomised variants are not commercially available. This study used 316L stainless steel powder with an average particle size <18μm. An existing slurry-LPBF machine was re-designed and re-built, allowing successful slurry processing. Two optimal parameter sets were obtained, resulting in component density of 99.4%. Tensile testing revealed an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 622 ± 2 MPa and an elongation at break of 66 ± 2%. These results are consistent, and fall within the range of reported values in literature for dry-powder LPBF, with the UTS being on the lower side of the range, whilst elongation at break being on the higher side.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing letters
Additive manufacturing letters Materials Science (General), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信