聊天-GPT 对有关拇指关节炎的常见问题做出了充分回应

Chiara Suardi, Andrea Poggetti, Sandra Pfanner
{"title":"聊天-GPT 对有关拇指关节炎的常见问题做出了充分回应","authors":"Chiara Suardi,&nbsp;Andrea Poggetti,&nbsp;Sandra Pfanner","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate ChatGPT responses to common questions patients have regarding thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding CMC OA were chosen from FAQs found on the websites of major institutions. These were presented to ChatGPT and responses were rated as “excellent response not requiring clarification,” “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification,” or “unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.”</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>3 responses were considered excellent requiring no clarification, 4 responses were satisfactory requiring minimal clarification, 3 were satisfactory requiring moderate clarification, and no answer was considered unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>As hypothesized, ChatGPT provided generally information to common questions around CMC OA. Although clarification was often needed, responses were satisfactory for providing generalized information about clinical presentation and management (conservative vs surgical).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001395/pdfft?md5=96bc6772f40e304b394f0261d16ff132&pid=1-s2.0-S2773157X24001395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chat-GPT adequate response to FAQs about thumb arthritis\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Suardi,&nbsp;Andrea Poggetti,&nbsp;Sandra Pfanner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate ChatGPT responses to common questions patients have regarding thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding CMC OA were chosen from FAQs found on the websites of major institutions. These were presented to ChatGPT and responses were rated as “excellent response not requiring clarification,” “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification,” or “unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.”</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>3 responses were considered excellent requiring no clarification, 4 responses were satisfactory requiring minimal clarification, 3 were satisfactory requiring moderate clarification, and no answer was considered unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>As hypothesized, ChatGPT provided generally information to common questions around CMC OA. Although clarification was often needed, responses were satisfactory for providing generalized information about clinical presentation and management (conservative vs surgical).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001395/pdfft?md5=96bc6772f40e304b394f0261d16ff132&pid=1-s2.0-S2773157X24001395-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估 ChatGPT 对患者提出的有关拇指腕掌骨关节炎(CMC OA)的常见问题的回复情况。方法从主要机构网站上的常见问题中挑选了十个有关 CMC OA 的常见问题(FAQ)。这些问题被提交到 ChatGPT,回答被评为 "不需要澄清的优秀回答"、"需要少量澄清的满意回答"、"需要适度澄清的满意回答 "或 "需要大量澄清的不满意回答"。结果3 个回答被认为是不需要澄清的优秀回答,4 个回答是需要少量澄清的满意回答,3 个回答是需要适度澄清的满意回答,没有回答被认为是需要大量澄清的不满意回答。尽管经常需要澄清,但在提供有关临床表现和治疗(保守治疗与手术治疗)的一般信息方面,回答还是令人满意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chat-GPT adequate response to FAQs about thumb arthritis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate ChatGPT responses to common questions patients have regarding thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA).

Methods

Ten frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding CMC OA were chosen from FAQs found on the websites of major institutions. These were presented to ChatGPT and responses were rated as “excellent response not requiring clarification,” “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification,” or “unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.”

Results

3 responses were considered excellent requiring no clarification, 4 responses were satisfactory requiring minimal clarification, 3 were satisfactory requiring moderate clarification, and no answer was considered unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.

Conclusion

As hypothesized, ChatGPT provided generally information to common questions around CMC OA. Although clarification was often needed, responses were satisfactory for providing generalized information about clinical presentation and management (conservative vs surgical).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信