开发基于立体电子脑电图的癫痫发作匹配系统,用于癫痫手术的临床决策。

John Thomas, Chifaou Abdallah, Kassem Jaber, Mays Khweileh, Olivier Aron, Irena Doležalová, Vadym Gnatkovsky, Daniel Mansilla, Päivi Nevalainen, Raluca Pana, Stephan Schuele, Jaysingh Singh, Ana Suller-Marti, Alexandra Urban, Jeffery Hall, François Dubeau, Louis Maillard, Philippe Kahane, Jean Gotman, Birgit Frauscher
{"title":"开发基于立体电子脑电图的癫痫发作匹配系统,用于癫痫手术的临床决策。","authors":"John Thomas, Chifaou Abdallah, Kassem Jaber, Mays Khweileh, Olivier Aron, Irena Doležalová, Vadym Gnatkovsky, Daniel Mansilla, Päivi Nevalainen, Raluca Pana, Stephan Schuele, Jaysingh Singh, Ana Suller-Marti, Alexandra Urban, Jeffery Hall, François Dubeau, Louis Maillard, Philippe Kahane, Jean Gotman, Birgit Frauscher","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad7323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The proportion of patients becoming seizure-free after epilepsy surgery has stagnated. Large multi-center stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) datasets can allow comparing new patients to past similar cases and making clinical decisions with the knowledge of how cases were treated in the past. However, the complexity of these evaluations makes the manual search for similar patients impractical. We aim to develop an automated system that electrographically and anatomically matches seizures to those in a database. Additionally, since features that define seizure similarity are unknown, we evaluate the agreement and features among experts in classifying similarity.<i>Approach.</i>We utilized 320 SEEG seizures from 95 consecutive patients who underwent epilepsy surgery. Eight international experts evaluated seizure-pair similarity using a four-level similarity score. As our primary outcome, we developed and validated an automated seizure matching system by employing patient data marked by independent experts. Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater agreement (IRA) and features for classifying seizure similarity.<i>Main results.</i>The seizure matching system achieved a median area-under-the-curve of 0.76 (interquartile range, 0.1), indicating its feasibility. Six distinct seizure similarity features were identified and proved effective: onset region, onset pattern, propagation region, duration, extent of spread, and propagation speed. Among these features, the onset region showed the strongest correlation with expert scores (Spearman's rho = 0.75,<i>p</i>< 0.001). Additionally, the moderate IRA confirmed the practicality of our approach with an agreement of 73.9% (7%), and Gwet's kappa of 0.45 (0.16). Further, the interoperability of the system was validated on seizures from five centers.<i>Significance.</i>We demonstrated the feasibility and validity of a SEEG seizure matching system across patients, effectively mirroring the expertise of epileptologists. This novel system can identify patients with seizures similar to that of a patient being evaluated, thus optimizing the treatment plan by considering the results of treating similar patients in the past, potentially improving surgery outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a stereo-EEG based seizure matching system for clinical decision making in epilepsy surgery.\",\"authors\":\"John Thomas, Chifaou Abdallah, Kassem Jaber, Mays Khweileh, Olivier Aron, Irena Doležalová, Vadym Gnatkovsky, Daniel Mansilla, Päivi Nevalainen, Raluca Pana, Stephan Schuele, Jaysingh Singh, Ana Suller-Marti, Alexandra Urban, Jeffery Hall, François Dubeau, Louis Maillard, Philippe Kahane, Jean Gotman, Birgit Frauscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/ad7323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The proportion of patients becoming seizure-free after epilepsy surgery has stagnated. Large multi-center stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) datasets can allow comparing new patients to past similar cases and making clinical decisions with the knowledge of how cases were treated in the past. However, the complexity of these evaluations makes the manual search for similar patients impractical. We aim to develop an automated system that electrographically and anatomically matches seizures to those in a database. Additionally, since features that define seizure similarity are unknown, we evaluate the agreement and features among experts in classifying similarity.<i>Approach.</i>We utilized 320 SEEG seizures from 95 consecutive patients who underwent epilepsy surgery. Eight international experts evaluated seizure-pair similarity using a four-level similarity score. As our primary outcome, we developed and validated an automated seizure matching system by employing patient data marked by independent experts. Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater agreement (IRA) and features for classifying seizure similarity.<i>Main results.</i>The seizure matching system achieved a median area-under-the-curve of 0.76 (interquartile range, 0.1), indicating its feasibility. Six distinct seizure similarity features were identified and proved effective: onset region, onset pattern, propagation region, duration, extent of spread, and propagation speed. Among these features, the onset region showed the strongest correlation with expert scores (Spearman's rho = 0.75,<i>p</i>< 0.001). Additionally, the moderate IRA confirmed the practicality of our approach with an agreement of 73.9% (7%), and Gwet's kappa of 0.45 (0.16). Further, the interoperability of the system was validated on seizures from five centers.<i>Significance.</i>We demonstrated the feasibility and validity of a SEEG seizure matching system across patients, effectively mirroring the expertise of epileptologists. This novel system can identify patients with seizures similar to that of a patient being evaluated, thus optimizing the treatment plan by considering the results of treating similar patients in the past, potentially improving surgery outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad7323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad7323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癫痫手术后不再发作的患者比例停滞不前。大型多中心立体脑电图数据集可将新患者与过去的类似病例进行比较,并在了解过去病例治疗方法的基础上做出临床决策。然而,这些评估的复杂性使得手动搜索类似患者变得不切实际。我们的目标是开发一种自动系统,从电学和解剖学角度将癫痫发作与数据库中的癫痫发作相匹配。此外,由于定义癫痫发作相似性的特征尚不清楚,我们评估了专家在分类相似性时的一致性和特征:我们利用了连续接受癫痫手术的 95 名患者的 320 次立体脑电图发作。八位国际专家使用四级相似性评分来评估发作对的相似性。作为主要结果,我们利用独立专家标记的患者数据开发并验证了自动癫痫发作匹配系统。次要结果包括评分者之间的一致性和癫痫发作相似性分类特征:癫痫发作匹配系统的中位曲线下面积为 0.76(四分位间范围为 0.1),表明其具有可行性。识别出并证明有效的六种不同的癫痫发作相似性特征:起始区域、起始模式、传播区域、持续时间、扩散范围和传播速度。在这些特征中,发病区域与专家评分的相关性最强(Spearman's rho=0.75,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a stereo-EEG based seizure matching system for clinical decision making in epilepsy surgery.

Objective.The proportion of patients becoming seizure-free after epilepsy surgery has stagnated. Large multi-center stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) datasets can allow comparing new patients to past similar cases and making clinical decisions with the knowledge of how cases were treated in the past. However, the complexity of these evaluations makes the manual search for similar patients impractical. We aim to develop an automated system that electrographically and anatomically matches seizures to those in a database. Additionally, since features that define seizure similarity are unknown, we evaluate the agreement and features among experts in classifying similarity.Approach.We utilized 320 SEEG seizures from 95 consecutive patients who underwent epilepsy surgery. Eight international experts evaluated seizure-pair similarity using a four-level similarity score. As our primary outcome, we developed and validated an automated seizure matching system by employing patient data marked by independent experts. Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater agreement (IRA) and features for classifying seizure similarity.Main results.The seizure matching system achieved a median area-under-the-curve of 0.76 (interquartile range, 0.1), indicating its feasibility. Six distinct seizure similarity features were identified and proved effective: onset region, onset pattern, propagation region, duration, extent of spread, and propagation speed. Among these features, the onset region showed the strongest correlation with expert scores (Spearman's rho = 0.75,p< 0.001). Additionally, the moderate IRA confirmed the practicality of our approach with an agreement of 73.9% (7%), and Gwet's kappa of 0.45 (0.16). Further, the interoperability of the system was validated on seizures from five centers.Significance.We demonstrated the feasibility and validity of a SEEG seizure matching system across patients, effectively mirroring the expertise of epileptologists. This novel system can identify patients with seizures similar to that of a patient being evaluated, thus optimizing the treatment plan by considering the results of treating similar patients in the past, potentially improving surgery outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信