主动监测低风险甲状腺乳头状癌(mPTC)的分子图谱分析。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Teresa Ramone, Arianna Ghirri, Alessandro Prete, Antonio Matrone, Raffaele Ciampi, Paolo Piaggi, Maria Scutari, Teresa Rago, Liborio Torregrossa, Cristina Romei, Rossella Elisei, Eleonora Molinaro
{"title":"主动监测低风险甲状腺乳头状癌(mPTC)的分子图谱分析。","authors":"Teresa Ramone, Arianna Ghirri, Alessandro Prete, Antonio Matrone, Raffaele Ciampi, Paolo Piaggi, Maria Scutari, Teresa Rago, Liborio Torregrossa, Cristina Romei, Rossella Elisei, Eleonora Molinaro","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The active surveillance (AS) program for papillary thyroid carcinoma (≤1 cm) at low risk (mPTC) showed a low percentage of progression.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to find a molecular signature of cases that showed disease progression during AS, which would allow their early identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed next-generation sequencing of 95 fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens from cases prospectively enrolled in the AS program to analyze key somatic driver alterations or gene fusions implicated in PTC tumorigenesis. TERT promoter analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRAF p.V600E was found in 66.3% (63/95) of mPTC and was the most common somatic alteration, followed by RAS oncogene mutations detected in 3.2% of mPTC (3/95: 2 NRAS and 1 KRAS) and gene fusions detected in 3.2% of mPTC (3/95: 1 RET-PTC1, 1 TFG-NTRK1, 1 ALK imbalance). No TERT promoter mutations (C228T and C250T) were found in the analyzed mPTC (84/95). The comparison between the molecular profile and the clinical outcome of the mPTC (stable vs progressive disease) showed no correlation (P = .6) and did not identify a molecular signature able to identify progressive mPTC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The molecular profile of mPTC is like that of bigger PTC with the exception that none of them showed a TERT promoter mutation. The identification of the most common driver mutations, such as BRAF, RAS, or gene fusions, is not helpful for the early identification of mPTC that will show disease progression during follow-up in the AS program.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"685-692"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Profiling of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (mPTC) on Active Surveillance.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Ramone, Arianna Ghirri, Alessandro Prete, Antonio Matrone, Raffaele Ciampi, Paolo Piaggi, Maria Scutari, Teresa Rago, Liborio Torregrossa, Cristina Romei, Rossella Elisei, Eleonora Molinaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgae575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The active surveillance (AS) program for papillary thyroid carcinoma (≤1 cm) at low risk (mPTC) showed a low percentage of progression.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to find a molecular signature of cases that showed disease progression during AS, which would allow their early identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed next-generation sequencing of 95 fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens from cases prospectively enrolled in the AS program to analyze key somatic driver alterations or gene fusions implicated in PTC tumorigenesis. TERT promoter analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRAF p.V600E was found in 66.3% (63/95) of mPTC and was the most common somatic alteration, followed by RAS oncogene mutations detected in 3.2% of mPTC (3/95: 2 NRAS and 1 KRAS) and gene fusions detected in 3.2% of mPTC (3/95: 1 RET-PTC1, 1 TFG-NTRK1, 1 ALK imbalance). No TERT promoter mutations (C228T and C250T) were found in the analyzed mPTC (84/95). The comparison between the molecular profile and the clinical outcome of the mPTC (stable vs progressive disease) showed no correlation (P = .6) and did not identify a molecular signature able to identify progressive mPTC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The molecular profile of mPTC is like that of bigger PTC with the exception that none of them showed a TERT promoter mutation. The identification of the most common driver mutations, such as BRAF, RAS, or gene fusions, is not helpful for the early identification of mPTC that will show disease progression during follow-up in the AS program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"685-692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae575\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对低危甲状腺乳头状癌(≤1厘米)的主动监测(AS)计划显示,病情进展的比例较低:本研究的目的是找到在主动监测期间出现疾病进展的病例的分子特征,以便及早识别这些病例:我们对95份细针穿刺细胞学标本进行了新一代测序,这些标本来自AS项目的前瞻性登记病例,目的是分析与PTC肿瘤发生有关的关键体细胞驱动基因改变或基因融合。采用桑格测序法或液滴数字 PCR 进行了 TERT 启动子分析:结果:66.3%(63/95)的 mPTC 发现 BRAF p.V600E,这是最常见的体细胞改变,其次是 3.2% 的 mPTC 发现 RAS 致癌基因突变(3/95:2 例 NRAS 和 1 例 KRAS),3.2% 的 mPTC 发现基因融合(3/95:1 例 RET-PTC1、1 例 TFG-NTRK1 和 1 例 ALK 不平衡)。在分析的 mPTC 患者(84/95)中未发现 TERT 启动子突变(C228T 和 C250T)。分子特征与mPTC临床结果(病情稳定与进展)的比较结果显示两者之间没有相关性(P值=0.6),也没有发现能够识别进展期mPTC的分子特征:结论:mPTC 的分子特征与更大的 PTC 相似,但它们都没有出现 TERT 启动子突变。鉴定最常见的驱动基因突变,如BRAF、RAS或基因融合,无助于在AS项目的随访过程中早期识别会出现疾病进展的mPTC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular Profiling of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (mPTC) on Active Surveillance.

Context: The active surveillance (AS) program for papillary thyroid carcinoma (≤1 cm) at low risk (mPTC) showed a low percentage of progression.

Objective: The aim of this study was to find a molecular signature of cases that showed disease progression during AS, which would allow their early identification.

Methods: We performed next-generation sequencing of 95 fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens from cases prospectively enrolled in the AS program to analyze key somatic driver alterations or gene fusions implicated in PTC tumorigenesis. TERT promoter analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.

Results: BRAF p.V600E was found in 66.3% (63/95) of mPTC and was the most common somatic alteration, followed by RAS oncogene mutations detected in 3.2% of mPTC (3/95: 2 NRAS and 1 KRAS) and gene fusions detected in 3.2% of mPTC (3/95: 1 RET-PTC1, 1 TFG-NTRK1, 1 ALK imbalance). No TERT promoter mutations (C228T and C250T) were found in the analyzed mPTC (84/95). The comparison between the molecular profile and the clinical outcome of the mPTC (stable vs progressive disease) showed no correlation (P = .6) and did not identify a molecular signature able to identify progressive mPTC.

Conclusion: The molecular profile of mPTC is like that of bigger PTC with the exception that none of them showed a TERT promoter mutation. The identification of the most common driver mutations, such as BRAF, RAS, or gene fusions, is not helpful for the early identification of mPTC that will show disease progression during follow-up in the AS program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信