无需透视的心房颤动脉冲场消融术。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nicholas O Palmeri, Daniel Alyesh, Madison Keith, Erin Greenhaw, Cooper Erickson, William Choe, Sri Sundaram
{"title":"无需透视的心房颤动脉冲场消融术。","authors":"Nicholas O Palmeri, Daniel Alyesh, Madison Keith, Erin Greenhaw, Cooper Erickson, William Choe, Sri Sundaram","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01904-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and fluoroless ablation (FA) are emerging techniques in contemporary in electrophysiology. With widespread use of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems and advanced intracardiac echo (ICE) imaging, fluoroless ablation has become more widely adopted. However, with the importance of tissue contact for lesion durability, initial PFA has been used with fluoroscopic guidance, but both ICE and electroanatomic mapping make fluoroless PFA feasible. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that PFA can be done safely and effectively without fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a single center, consecutive patients undergoing ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter using a fluoroless approach are described. The standard 3D anatomic map settings were adjusted with changes in interior and exterior projection, respiratory compensation, and interpolation. In addition, projection map lesions were used to confirm adequate circumferential ablation lesions. ICE was used extensively for wire guidance and evaluation of contact with tissue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beginning on March 15, 2024, 50 consecutive subjects (19 female/31 male) aged 68.0 (± 13.7) underwent PFA ablation. The average CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VA<sub>2</sub>Sc score was 3.0 (± 1.9). The average LVEF was 57.3% (± 10.0) and the average LA size was 3.9 cm (± 1.2). Projection lesions were placed with every application of PFA. An average of 41.7 (± 8.5) PFA applications were placed. In 100% (50/50) of subjects, acute isolation of the pulmonary veins was achieved. Eighteen subjects also underwent concomitant posterior wall isolation and in 100% of these subjects, posterior isolation was achieved. There were zero complications in this cohort. In 50/50 subjects (100%), fluoroscopy was not used. In comparison to the control cohort, the LA dwell time of the ablation catheter was similar (p = 0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to the traditional PFA with fluoroscopy, this proof-of-concept study shows fluoroless PFA ablation can be performed safely and with similar acute success rates as with use of fluoroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas O Palmeri, Daniel Alyesh, Madison Keith, Erin Greenhaw, Cooper Erickson, William Choe, Sri Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01904-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and fluoroless ablation (FA) are emerging techniques in contemporary in electrophysiology. With widespread use of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems and advanced intracardiac echo (ICE) imaging, fluoroless ablation has become more widely adopted. However, with the importance of tissue contact for lesion durability, initial PFA has been used with fluoroscopic guidance, but both ICE and electroanatomic mapping make fluoroless PFA feasible. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that PFA can be done safely and effectively without fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a single center, consecutive patients undergoing ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter using a fluoroless approach are described. The standard 3D anatomic map settings were adjusted with changes in interior and exterior projection, respiratory compensation, and interpolation. In addition, projection map lesions were used to confirm adequate circumferential ablation lesions. ICE was used extensively for wire guidance and evaluation of contact with tissue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beginning on March 15, 2024, 50 consecutive subjects (19 female/31 male) aged 68.0 (± 13.7) underwent PFA ablation. The average CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VA<sub>2</sub>Sc score was 3.0 (± 1.9). The average LVEF was 57.3% (± 10.0) and the average LA size was 3.9 cm (± 1.2). Projection lesions were placed with every application of PFA. An average of 41.7 (± 8.5) PFA applications were placed. In 100% (50/50) of subjects, acute isolation of the pulmonary veins was achieved. Eighteen subjects also underwent concomitant posterior wall isolation and in 100% of these subjects, posterior isolation was achieved. There were zero complications in this cohort. In 50/50 subjects (100%), fluoroscopy was not used. In comparison to the control cohort, the LA dwell time of the ablation catheter was similar (p = 0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to the traditional PFA with fluoroscopy, this proof-of-concept study shows fluoroless PFA ablation can be performed safely and with similar acute success rates as with use of fluoroscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01904-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01904-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:脉冲场消融(PFA)和无氟消融(FA)是当代电生理学的新兴技术。随着三维电解剖映射系统和先进的心内回声(ICE)成像技术的广泛应用,无氟消融技术已得到越来越广泛的应用。然而,由于组织接触对病变耐久性的重要性,最初的 PFA 都是在透视引导下进行的,但 ICE 和电解剖图使无氟 PFA 变得可行。本研究的目的是证明 PFA 无需透视即可安全有效地完成:方法:本研究描述了在一个中心,使用五线 PFA 导管以无氟方法进行消融的连续患者的情况。对标准三维解剖图设置进行了调整,改变了内部和外部投影、呼吸补偿和插值。此外,还使用投影图病灶来确认适当的环形消融病灶。ICE 被广泛用于导丝引导和评估与组织的接触情况:从 2024 年 3 月 15 日开始,50 名连续受试者(19 名女性/31 名男性)接受了 PFA 消融术,年龄为 68.0(± 13.7)岁。平均 CHA2DS2-VA2Sc 评分为 3.0(± 1.9)分。平均 LVEF 为 57.3%(± 10.0),LA 平均尺寸为 3.9 厘米(± 1.2)。每次使用 PFA 时都会放置投影病灶。平均使用了 41.7 次(± 8.5)PFA。100%(50/50)的受试者实现了肺静脉的急性隔离。18 名受试者还同时进行了后壁隔离,其中 100%的受试者实现了后壁隔离。该组受试者的并发症为零。50/50的受试者(100%)没有使用透视。与对照组相比,消融导管在洛杉矶的停留时间相似(p = 0.34):结论:与传统的透视 PFA 相比,这项概念验证研究表明,无氟 PFA 消融术可以安全进行,急性成功率与使用透视时相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy.

Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy.

Introduction: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and fluoroless ablation (FA) are emerging techniques in contemporary in electrophysiology. With widespread use of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems and advanced intracardiac echo (ICE) imaging, fluoroless ablation has become more widely adopted. However, with the importance of tissue contact for lesion durability, initial PFA has been used with fluoroscopic guidance, but both ICE and electroanatomic mapping make fluoroless PFA feasible. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that PFA can be done safely and effectively without fluoroscopy.

Methods: At a single center, consecutive patients undergoing ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter using a fluoroless approach are described. The standard 3D anatomic map settings were adjusted with changes in interior and exterior projection, respiratory compensation, and interpolation. In addition, projection map lesions were used to confirm adequate circumferential ablation lesions. ICE was used extensively for wire guidance and evaluation of contact with tissue.

Results: Beginning on March 15, 2024, 50 consecutive subjects (19 female/31 male) aged 68.0 (± 13.7) underwent PFA ablation. The average CHA2DS2-VA2Sc score was 3.0 (± 1.9). The average LVEF was 57.3% (± 10.0) and the average LA size was 3.9 cm (± 1.2). Projection lesions were placed with every application of PFA. An average of 41.7 (± 8.5) PFA applications were placed. In 100% (50/50) of subjects, acute isolation of the pulmonary veins was achieved. Eighteen subjects also underwent concomitant posterior wall isolation and in 100% of these subjects, posterior isolation was achieved. There were zero complications in this cohort. In 50/50 subjects (100%), fluoroscopy was not used. In comparison to the control cohort, the LA dwell time of the ablation catheter was similar (p = 0.34).

Conclusion: In comparison to the traditional PFA with fluoroscopy, this proof-of-concept study shows fluoroless PFA ablation can be performed safely and with similar acute success rates as with use of fluoroscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信