超加工食品在植物性膳食中的作用:与人类健康和环境可持续性的关系。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
European Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1007/s00394-024-03477-w
Merel C Daas, Reina E Vellinga, Maria Gabriela M Pinho, Jolanda M A Boer, W M Monique Verschuren, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Pieter Van't Veer, Sander Biesbroek
{"title":"超加工食品在植物性膳食中的作用:与人类健康和环境可持续性的关系。","authors":"Merel C Daas, Reina E Vellinga, Maria Gabriela M Pinho, Jolanda M A Boer, W M Monique Verschuren, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Pieter Van't Veer, Sander Biesbroek","doi":"10.1007/s00394-024-03477-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Investigate the associations of ultra-processed foods (UPF) in healthful (hPDI) and unhealthful (uPDI) plant-based diets with all-cause mortality, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), and blue water consumption (BWC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were based on 35,030 participants (20-70 years; 74% females) from the EPIC-NL cohort who were followed up from 1993 to 1997 through 2014. Plant-based diet indices (hPDI and uPDI) and UPF consumption were calculated from a validated FFQ, assessed at baseline. Cox proportional hazard and multiple linear regression models were used to estimate associations between combined quartiles of the PDI indices and UPF consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With lower hPDI and higher UPF diets as the reference, we observed the following. Risk estimates of all-cause mortality were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.16) for lower UPF consumption, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.08) for higher hPDI, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. Results with the uPDI were inconclusive. Mean differences in GHGE and BWC were 1.4% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.4) and 1.6% (95% CI: -0.5, 3.7) for lower UPF consumption, -7.4% (95% CI: -8.6, -6.4) and 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 12.0) for higher hPDI, and - 6.8% (95% CI: -7.4, -6.1) and 13.1% (95% CI: 11.6, 14.8) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. No apparent conflict between environmental impacts was observed for the uPDI; GHGE and BWC were lower for higher uPDI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality risk and environmental impacts were mostly associated with the amount of plant-based foods and to a lesser extent UPF in the diet. Shifting to a more healthful plant-based diet could improve human health and reduce most aspects of environmental impact (GHGE, but not BWC) irrespective of UPF consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"2957-2973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of ultra-processed foods in plant-based diets: associations with human health and environmental sustainability.\",\"authors\":\"Merel C Daas, Reina E Vellinga, Maria Gabriela M Pinho, Jolanda M A Boer, W M Monique Verschuren, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Pieter Van't Veer, Sander Biesbroek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00394-024-03477-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Investigate the associations of ultra-processed foods (UPF) in healthful (hPDI) and unhealthful (uPDI) plant-based diets with all-cause mortality, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), and blue water consumption (BWC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were based on 35,030 participants (20-70 years; 74% females) from the EPIC-NL cohort who were followed up from 1993 to 1997 through 2014. Plant-based diet indices (hPDI and uPDI) and UPF consumption were calculated from a validated FFQ, assessed at baseline. Cox proportional hazard and multiple linear regression models were used to estimate associations between combined quartiles of the PDI indices and UPF consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With lower hPDI and higher UPF diets as the reference, we observed the following. Risk estimates of all-cause mortality were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.16) for lower UPF consumption, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.08) for higher hPDI, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. Results with the uPDI were inconclusive. Mean differences in GHGE and BWC were 1.4% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.4) and 1.6% (95% CI: -0.5, 3.7) for lower UPF consumption, -7.4% (95% CI: -8.6, -6.4) and 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 12.0) for higher hPDI, and - 6.8% (95% CI: -7.4, -6.1) and 13.1% (95% CI: 11.6, 14.8) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. No apparent conflict between environmental impacts was observed for the uPDI; GHGE and BWC were lower for higher uPDI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality risk and environmental impacts were mostly associated with the amount of plant-based foods and to a lesser extent UPF in the diet. Shifting to a more healthful plant-based diet could improve human health and reduce most aspects of environmental impact (GHGE, but not BWC) irrespective of UPF consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2957-2973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519232/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03477-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03477-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查健康(hPDI)和不健康(uPDI)植物性膳食中的超加工食品(UPF)与全因死亡率、温室气体排放量(GHGE)和蓝水消耗量(BWC)的关系:分析基于 EPIC-NL 队列中的 35030 名参与者(20-70 岁;74% 为女性),这些参与者从 1993 年至 1997 年一直随访到 2014 年。植物性饮食指数(hPDI和uPDI)和UPF消耗量是通过基线评估的有效FFQ计算得出的。采用考克斯比例危险模型和多元线性回归模型来估计植物性膳食指数的综合四分位数与UPF消耗量之间的关系:以较低的 hPDI 和较高的 UPF 饮食作为参考,我们观察到以下结果。全因死亡率的风险估计值为:UPF 消费量较低为 0.98(95% CI:0.83,1.16),hPDI 较高为 0.86(95% CI:0.68,1.08),hPDI 较高和 UPF 消费量较低的组合为 0.78(95% CI:0.66,0.89)。uPDI的结果尚无定论。对于较低的 UPF 消费量,GHGE 和 BWC 的平均差异分别为 1.4% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.4) 和 1.6% (95% CI: -0.5, 3.7);对于较高的 HPDI 和较低的 UPF 消费量,GHGE 和 BWC 的平均差异分别为 -7.4% (95% CI: -8.6, -6.4) 和 9.6% (95% CI: -0.5, 3.7)。较高的 hPDI 和较低的 UPF 消费分别为-6.8%(95% CI:-7.4,-6.1)和 13.1%(95% CI:11.6,14.8)。uPDI的环境影响之间没有明显的冲突;uPDI分数越高,GHGE和BWC越低:结论:死亡率风险和环境影响主要与膳食中植物性食物的摄入量有关,其次与 UPF 有关。转向更健康的植物性膳食可改善人类健康,并减少对环境的大部分影响(GHGE,但不包括 BWC),而与 UPF 消费量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of ultra-processed foods in plant-based diets: associations with human health and environmental sustainability.

The role of ultra-processed foods in plant-based diets: associations with human health and environmental sustainability.

Purpose: Investigate the associations of ultra-processed foods (UPF) in healthful (hPDI) and unhealthful (uPDI) plant-based diets with all-cause mortality, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), and blue water consumption (BWC).

Methods: Analyses were based on 35,030 participants (20-70 years; 74% females) from the EPIC-NL cohort who were followed up from 1993 to 1997 through 2014. Plant-based diet indices (hPDI and uPDI) and UPF consumption were calculated from a validated FFQ, assessed at baseline. Cox proportional hazard and multiple linear regression models were used to estimate associations between combined quartiles of the PDI indices and UPF consumption.

Results: With lower hPDI and higher UPF diets as the reference, we observed the following. Risk estimates of all-cause mortality were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.16) for lower UPF consumption, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.08) for higher hPDI, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. Results with the uPDI were inconclusive. Mean differences in GHGE and BWC were 1.4% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.4) and 1.6% (95% CI: -0.5, 3.7) for lower UPF consumption, -7.4% (95% CI: -8.6, -6.4) and 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 12.0) for higher hPDI, and - 6.8% (95% CI: -7.4, -6.1) and 13.1% (95% CI: 11.6, 14.8) for combined higher hPDI and lower UPF consumption. No apparent conflict between environmental impacts was observed for the uPDI; GHGE and BWC were lower for higher uPDI scores.

Conclusion: Mortality risk and environmental impacts were mostly associated with the amount of plant-based foods and to a lesser extent UPF in the diet. Shifting to a more healthful plant-based diet could improve human health and reduce most aspects of environmental impact (GHGE, but not BWC) irrespective of UPF consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信