纤维化间质性肺病患者的支气管肺泡灌洗液细胞分析和放射学模式。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.166
Amanda Grant-Orser, Michael Asmussen, Daniel-Costin Marinescu, Cameron J Hague, Nestor L Muller, Darra T Murphy, Andrew Churg, Joanne L Wright, Amna Al-Arnawoot, Ana-Maria Bilawich, Patrick Bourgouin, Gerard Cox, Celine Durand, Tracy Elliot, Jennifer Ellis, Jolene H Fisher, Derek Fladeland, Gillian C Goobie, Zachary Guenther, Ehsan Haider, Nathan Hambly, James Huynh, Geoffrey Karjala, Nasreen Khalil, Martin Kolb, Jonathon Leipsic, Stacey Lok, Sarah MacIsaac, Micheal McInnis, Helene Manganas, Veronica Marcoux, John Mayo, Julie Morisset, Ciaran Scallan, Tony Sedlic, Shane Shapera, Kelly Sun, Victoria Tan, Alyson W Wong, Boyang Zheng, Christopher J Ryerson, Kerri A Johannson
{"title":"纤维化间质性肺病患者的支气管肺泡灌洗液细胞分析和放射学模式。","authors":"Amanda Grant-Orser, Michael Asmussen, Daniel-Costin Marinescu, Cameron J Hague, Nestor L Muller, Darra T Murphy, Andrew Churg, Joanne L Wright, Amna Al-Arnawoot, Ana-Maria Bilawich, Patrick Bourgouin, Gerard Cox, Celine Durand, Tracy Elliot, Jennifer Ellis, Jolene H Fisher, Derek Fladeland, Gillian C Goobie, Zachary Guenther, Ehsan Haider, Nathan Hambly, James Huynh, Geoffrey Karjala, Nasreen Khalil, Martin Kolb, Jonathon Leipsic, Stacey Lok, Sarah MacIsaac, Micheal McInnis, Helene Manganas, Veronica Marcoux, John Mayo, Julie Morisset, Ciaran Scallan, Tony Sedlic, Shane Shapera, Kelly Sun, Victoria Tan, Alyson W Wong, Boyang Zheng, Christopher J Ryerson, Kerri A Johannson","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>BAL cellular analysis is often recommended during the initial diagnostic evaluation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Despite recommendation for its use, between-center heterogeneity exists and supportive data concerning the clinical utility and correlation of BAL findings with radiologic features or patterns remain sparse.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>In patients with fibrotic ILD, are BAL findings associated with radiologic features, patterns, and clinical diagnoses?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Patients with fibrotic ILD who underwent BAL for diagnostic evaluation and who were enrolled in the prospective Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were re-reviewed in a standardized multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). BAL was categorized according to guideline-recommended thresholds, and using thresholds of lymphocytosis > 20% and neutrophils > 4.5%. High-resolution CT (HRCT) scans were scored (anonymized to clinical data) for specific features and percentage lung involvement. Radiologists classified HRCT scans according to guideline-defined patterns for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; then, MDD diagnoses were assigned, considering all available data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bronchoscopy with cellular analysis was performed in 209 of 1,593 patients (13%). Lymphocyte % was weakly negatively correlated with total fibrosis % (r = -0.16, P = .023) but not statistically significantly correlated with ground glass opacity % (r = 0.01, P = .94). A mixed BAL pattern was the most frequent in all radiologic patterns (range, 45%-69%), with a minority classifiable according to BAL guidelines. BAL lymphocytosis appeared with similar frequency across HRCT patterns of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (21%) and usual interstitial pneumonia (18%). Only 5% of patients with MDD-based fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis had a guideline-defined isolated lymphocytosis > 15%.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>BAL cellular analyses did not significantly correlate with radiologic features, guideline patterns, or MDD-based diagnoses. Ground glass opacities are often interpreted to represent pulmonary inflammation, but were not associated with BAL lymphocytosis in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"172-182"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BAL Fluid Cellular Analysis and Radiologic Patterns in Patients With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Grant-Orser, Michael Asmussen, Daniel-Costin Marinescu, Cameron J Hague, Nestor L Muller, Darra T Murphy, Andrew Churg, Joanne L Wright, Amna Al-Arnawoot, Ana-Maria Bilawich, Patrick Bourgouin, Gerard Cox, Celine Durand, Tracy Elliot, Jennifer Ellis, Jolene H Fisher, Derek Fladeland, Gillian C Goobie, Zachary Guenther, Ehsan Haider, Nathan Hambly, James Huynh, Geoffrey Karjala, Nasreen Khalil, Martin Kolb, Jonathon Leipsic, Stacey Lok, Sarah MacIsaac, Micheal McInnis, Helene Manganas, Veronica Marcoux, John Mayo, Julie Morisset, Ciaran Scallan, Tony Sedlic, Shane Shapera, Kelly Sun, Victoria Tan, Alyson W Wong, Boyang Zheng, Christopher J Ryerson, Kerri A Johannson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>BAL cellular analysis is often recommended during the initial diagnostic evaluation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Despite recommendation for its use, between-center heterogeneity exists and supportive data concerning the clinical utility and correlation of BAL findings with radiologic features or patterns remain sparse.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>In patients with fibrotic ILD, are BAL findings associated with radiologic features, patterns, and clinical diagnoses?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Patients with fibrotic ILD who underwent BAL for diagnostic evaluation and who were enrolled in the prospective Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were re-reviewed in a standardized multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). BAL was categorized according to guideline-recommended thresholds, and using thresholds of lymphocytosis > 20% and neutrophils > 4.5%. High-resolution CT (HRCT) scans were scored (anonymized to clinical data) for specific features and percentage lung involvement. Radiologists classified HRCT scans according to guideline-defined patterns for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; then, MDD diagnoses were assigned, considering all available data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bronchoscopy with cellular analysis was performed in 209 of 1,593 patients (13%). Lymphocyte % was weakly negatively correlated with total fibrosis % (r = -0.16, P = .023) but not statistically significantly correlated with ground glass opacity % (r = 0.01, P = .94). A mixed BAL pattern was the most frequent in all radiologic patterns (range, 45%-69%), with a minority classifiable according to BAL guidelines. BAL lymphocytosis appeared with similar frequency across HRCT patterns of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (21%) and usual interstitial pneumonia (18%). Only 5% of patients with MDD-based fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis had a guideline-defined isolated lymphocytosis > 15%.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>BAL cellular analyses did not significantly correlate with radiologic features, guideline patterns, or MDD-based diagnoses. Ground glass opacities are often interpreted to represent pulmonary inflammation, but were not associated with BAL lymphocytosis in this cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"172-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.166\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)细胞分析通常被推荐用于纤维化性 ILD 的初步诊断评估。尽管推荐使用该方法,但不同中心之间存在差异,有关 BAL 结果的临床实用性和与放射学特征或模式的相关性的支持性数据仍然很少:研究问题:在纤维化 ILD 患者中,BAL 结果与放射学特征、模式和临床诊断是否相关?在标准化多学科讨论(MDD)中重新审查了接受 BAL 诊断评估并加入前瞻性加拿大肺纤维化登记处的纤维化 ILD 患者。根据指南推荐的阈值对 BAL 进行分类,同时采用淋巴细胞增多>20% 和中性粒细胞增多>4.5% 的阈值。对高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)扫描的具体特征和肺部受累百分比进行评分(对临床数据保密)。放射科医生根据特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和纤维化超敏性肺炎(fHP)指南定义的模式对HRCT进行分类,然后根据所有可用数据做出MDD诊断:对209/1593(13%)例患者进行了支气管镜检查和细胞分析。淋巴细胞百分比与总纤维化百分比呈弱负相关(r=-0.16,p=0.023),但与磨玻璃不透明百分比无显著统计学相关性(r=0.01,p=0.94)。在所有放射学模式中,混合 BAL 模式最为常见(占 45% 至 69%),少数可根据 BAL 指南进行分类。BAL淋巴细胞增多在FHP(21%)和UIP(18%)的HRCT模式中出现的频率相似。只有5%的基于MDD的fHP患者的指南定义的孤立淋巴细胞增多率大于15%:BAL细胞分析与放射学特征、指南模式或基于MDD的诊断无明显相关性。磨玻璃不透明通常被解释为代表肺部炎症,但在本组患者中,磨玻璃不透明与 BAL 淋巴细胞增多无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BAL Fluid Cellular Analysis and Radiologic Patterns in Patients With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.

Background: BAL cellular analysis is often recommended during the initial diagnostic evaluation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Despite recommendation for its use, between-center heterogeneity exists and supportive data concerning the clinical utility and correlation of BAL findings with radiologic features or patterns remain sparse.

Research question: In patients with fibrotic ILD, are BAL findings associated with radiologic features, patterns, and clinical diagnoses?

Study design and methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD who underwent BAL for diagnostic evaluation and who were enrolled in the prospective Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were re-reviewed in a standardized multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). BAL was categorized according to guideline-recommended thresholds, and using thresholds of lymphocytosis > 20% and neutrophils > 4.5%. High-resolution CT (HRCT) scans were scored (anonymized to clinical data) for specific features and percentage lung involvement. Radiologists classified HRCT scans according to guideline-defined patterns for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; then, MDD diagnoses were assigned, considering all available data.

Results: Bronchoscopy with cellular analysis was performed in 209 of 1,593 patients (13%). Lymphocyte % was weakly negatively correlated with total fibrosis % (r = -0.16, P = .023) but not statistically significantly correlated with ground glass opacity % (r = 0.01, P = .94). A mixed BAL pattern was the most frequent in all radiologic patterns (range, 45%-69%), with a minority classifiable according to BAL guidelines. BAL lymphocytosis appeared with similar frequency across HRCT patterns of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (21%) and usual interstitial pneumonia (18%). Only 5% of patients with MDD-based fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis had a guideline-defined isolated lymphocytosis > 15%.

Interpretation: BAL cellular analyses did not significantly correlate with radiologic features, guideline patterns, or MDD-based diagnoses. Ground glass opacities are often interpreted to represent pulmonary inflammation, but were not associated with BAL lymphocytosis in this cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信