用于男性不育基因诊断测试的创新型一体化外显子组测序策略:验证和 10 个月的经验。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra
{"title":"用于男性不育基因诊断测试的创新型一体化外显子组测序策略:验证和 10 个月的经验。","authors":"Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra","doi":"10.1111/andr.13742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative all-in-one exome sequencing strategy for diagnostic genetic testing in male infertility: Validation and 10-month experience.\",\"authors\":\"Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/andr.13742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13742\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现行指南指出,极端少精子症或无精子症患者应进行染色体失衡、无精子症因子(AZF)缺失和/或 CFTR 变异检测。对于其他精子异常,不建议进行基因诊断:确定结合拷贝数变异(CNV)和单核苷酸变异(SNV)分析的外显子组测序(ES)是否是取代现有方法的可靠的一级方法(验证研究),并评估实施 10 个月后的诊断率(评估研究):在验证研究中,对已确诊为AZF缺失(17例)、(非)镶嵌性染色体非整倍体或染色体结构异常(37例)、CFTR变异(26例)或已知不孕症基因变异(4例)的患者以及90名对照者的DNA进行了ES分析。数据采用我们的标准诊断管道进行分析,并对 130 个男性不育基因进行了生物信息学筛选。在评估研究中,包括了292个临床外显子组的结果:结果:验证队列中所有之前报道过的变异,包括与临床相关的Y染色体微缺失,都得到了正确识别和可靠检测。在评估研究中,我们在所有 292 例病例中的 67 例(22.9%)中发现了一种或多种临床相关的遗传异常:其中包括 67 例患者中的 30 例(占总数的 10.2%)可以用现有方法检测到的畸变、67 例患者中的 28 例(9.6%)男性不育基因面板中的(可能)(单)遗传原因,以及 67 例患者中的 9 例(3.1%)囊性纤维化携带者:ES是检测男性不育最常见遗传原因的第一级可靠方法,由于可以检测到其他遗传原因,在我们的评估队列中,诊断率几乎翻了一番(10.2%-19.8%,不包括CF携带者)。基因诊断可提供不育原因的答案,并帮助专业人员提供治疗咨询、可能的并发症以及对后代和/或家庭成员的风险。仍有必要进行核型分析,以检测平衡易位或低度染色体嵌合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative all-in-one exome sequencing strategy for diagnostic genetic testing in male infertility: Validation and 10-month experience.

Background: Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.

Objectives: To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).

Materials and methods: In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.

Results: All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).

Conclusion: ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信