厘清系统发育和性状对欧洲蝴蝶气候风险的影响

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Andros T. Gianuca, Oliver Schweiger, Luis Mauricio Bini, Martin Wiemers, Victor Rocha di Cavalcanti, José Alexandre Diniz-Filho, Michiel F. WallisDeVries, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Josef Settele
{"title":"厘清系统发育和性状对欧洲蝴蝶气候风险的影响","authors":"Andros T. Gianuca,&nbsp;Oliver Schweiger,&nbsp;Luis Mauricio Bini,&nbsp;Martin Wiemers,&nbsp;Victor Rocha di Cavalcanti,&nbsp;José Alexandre Diniz-Filho,&nbsp;Michiel F. WallisDeVries,&nbsp;Niklaus E. Zimmermann,&nbsp;Josef Settele","doi":"10.1111/geb.13907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The relative importance of traits and phylogeny to predict species extinction risk is unclear and it depends on which traits are measured and their phylogenetic conservatism. Here, we evaluate the power of functional traits, ecological characteristics, such as range size and specialization, and phylogeny to predict climatic risks in European butterflies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Europe.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Distribution data from 1981 to 2002 was used to project range shifts up to 2080.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 268 European butterfly species (<i>Rhopalocera</i>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We extracted information on climatic risk for each species from the literature. Two hypothetical conditions were assumed: full climate tracking and no climate tracking. We used variation partitioning to quantify and disentangle the effects of phylogeny, four traits (wingspan, voltinism, overwintering and egg volume) and two ecological characteristics (range size and specialization) on climatic risk. We used Random Forest as an imputation method to predict climatic risk values for additional European butterfly species that have not been previously modelled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Range size and degree of specialization strongly predicted climatic risk of European butterflies, but only for no climate tracking scenarios. Overall, more generalist species have larger ranges and are less vulnerable to climate change. Furthermore, we found that phylogenetic information adds strong power to explain climatic risk, especially, but not exclusively for scenarios that assume full climate tracking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Considering current scenarios of habitat fragmentation in Europe, it is likely that species with smaller ranges and high degree of specialization will be unable to track their climates and thus be more at risk. However, our results imply that assisting dispersal and colonization might allow small ranged species to cope with climate change. Our analysis also indicate that phylogeny can be used as a proxy of unmeasured traits to predict climatic risk under certain circumstances.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13907","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the Influence of Phylogeny and Traits on Climatic Risk of European Butterflies\",\"authors\":\"Andros T. Gianuca,&nbsp;Oliver Schweiger,&nbsp;Luis Mauricio Bini,&nbsp;Martin Wiemers,&nbsp;Victor Rocha di Cavalcanti,&nbsp;José Alexandre Diniz-Filho,&nbsp;Michiel F. WallisDeVries,&nbsp;Niklaus E. Zimmermann,&nbsp;Josef Settele\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The relative importance of traits and phylogeny to predict species extinction risk is unclear and it depends on which traits are measured and their phylogenetic conservatism. Here, we evaluate the power of functional traits, ecological characteristics, such as range size and specialization, and phylogeny to predict climatic risks in European butterflies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Europe.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Distribution data from 1981 to 2002 was used to project range shifts up to 2080.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 268 European butterfly species (<i>Rhopalocera</i>).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We extracted information on climatic risk for each species from the literature. Two hypothetical conditions were assumed: full climate tracking and no climate tracking. We used variation partitioning to quantify and disentangle the effects of phylogeny, four traits (wingspan, voltinism, overwintering and egg volume) and two ecological characteristics (range size and specialization) on climatic risk. We used Random Forest as an imputation method to predict climatic risk values for additional European butterfly species that have not been previously modelled.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Range size and degree of specialization strongly predicted climatic risk of European butterflies, but only for no climate tracking scenarios. Overall, more generalist species have larger ranges and are less vulnerable to climate change. Furthermore, we found that phylogenetic information adds strong power to explain climatic risk, especially, but not exclusively for scenarios that assume full climate tracking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Considering current scenarios of habitat fragmentation in Europe, it is likely that species with smaller ranges and high degree of specialization will be unable to track their climates and thus be more at risk. However, our results imply that assisting dispersal and colonization might allow small ranged species to cope with climate change. Our analysis also indicate that phylogeny can be used as a proxy of unmeasured traits to predict climatic risk under certain circumstances.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13907\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13907\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 性状和系统发育在预测物种灭绝风险方面的相对重要性尚不明确,这取决于所测量的性状及其系统发育的保守性。在此,我们评估了功能性状、生态特征(如分布区大小和专一性)以及系统发育预测欧洲蝴蝶气候风险的能力。方法我们从文献中提取了每个物种的气候风险信息。我们假设了两种情况:完全气候跟踪和无气候跟踪。我们使用变异分区法量化并分离了系统发育、四种性状(翼展、伏蛰、越冬和卵量)和两种生态特征(分布区大小和特化)对气候风险的影响。我们使用随机森林(Random Forest)作为一种估算方法,预测了以前未模拟过的其他欧洲蝴蝶物种的气候风险值。结果分布区大小和特化程度强烈预测了欧洲蝴蝶的气候风险,但仅限于无气候跟踪情景。总体而言,通性物种的活动范围更大,更不容易受到气候变化的影响。此外,我们发现系统发育信息对气候风险的解释能力很强,尤其是在假设完全追踪气候的情景下。主要结论考虑到目前欧洲栖息地破碎化的情景,范围较小且高度专业化的物种很可能无法追踪其气候,从而面临更大的风险。然而,我们的研究结果表明,协助扩散和殖民化可能会使范围较小的物种应对气候变化。我们的分析还表明,在某些情况下,系统发育可以作为未测量特征的替代物来预测气候风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Disentangling the Influence of Phylogeny and Traits on Climatic Risk of European Butterflies

Disentangling the Influence of Phylogeny and Traits on Climatic Risk of European Butterflies

Aim

The relative importance of traits and phylogeny to predict species extinction risk is unclear and it depends on which traits are measured and their phylogenetic conservatism. Here, we evaluate the power of functional traits, ecological characteristics, such as range size and specialization, and phylogeny to predict climatic risks in European butterflies.

Location

Europe.

Time Period

Distribution data from 1981 to 2002 was used to project range shifts up to 2080.

Major Taxa Studied

In total, 268 European butterfly species (Rhopalocera).

Methods

We extracted information on climatic risk for each species from the literature. Two hypothetical conditions were assumed: full climate tracking and no climate tracking. We used variation partitioning to quantify and disentangle the effects of phylogeny, four traits (wingspan, voltinism, overwintering and egg volume) and two ecological characteristics (range size and specialization) on climatic risk. We used Random Forest as an imputation method to predict climatic risk values for additional European butterfly species that have not been previously modelled.

Results

Range size and degree of specialization strongly predicted climatic risk of European butterflies, but only for no climate tracking scenarios. Overall, more generalist species have larger ranges and are less vulnerable to climate change. Furthermore, we found that phylogenetic information adds strong power to explain climatic risk, especially, but not exclusively for scenarios that assume full climate tracking.

Main Conclusions

Considering current scenarios of habitat fragmentation in Europe, it is likely that species with smaller ranges and high degree of specialization will be unable to track their climates and thus be more at risk. However, our results imply that assisting dispersal and colonization might allow small ranged species to cope with climate change. Our analysis also indicate that phylogeny can be used as a proxy of unmeasured traits to predict climatic risk under certain circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信