{"title":"利用图神经网络模型进行预路由时序预测和优化","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vlsi.2024.102262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the application of deep learning (DL) models has sparked considerable interest in timing prediction within the place-and-route (P&R) flow of IC chip design. Specifically, at the pre-route stage, an accurate prediction of post-route timing is challenging due to the lack of sufficient physical information. However, achieving precise timing prediction significantly accelerates the design closure process, saving considerable time and effort. In this work, we propose pre-route timing prediction and optimization framework with graph neural network (GNN) models combined with convolution neural network (CNN). Our framework is divided into two main stages, each of which is further subdivided into smaller steps. Precisely, our GNN-driven arc delay/slew prediction model is divided into two levels: in level-1, it predicts net resistance (net R) and net capacitance (net C) using GNN while the arc length is predicted using CNN. These predictions are hierarchically passed on to level-2 where delay/slew is estimated with our GNN based prediction model. The timing optimization model utilizes the precise delay/slew predictions obtained from the GNN-driven prediction model to accurately set the path margin during the timing optimization stage. This approach effectively reduces unnecessary turn-around iterations in the commercial EDA tools. Experimental results show that by using our proposed framework in P&R, we are able to improve the pre-route prediction accuracy by 42%/36% on average on arc delay/slew, and improve timing metrics in terms of WNS, TNS, and the number of timing violation paths by 77%, 77%, and 64%, which are an increase of 32%/35% on arc delay/slew and 30%, 20% and 31% on timing optimization compared with the existing DL prediction model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54973,"journal":{"name":"Integration-The Vlsi Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-route timing prediction and optimization with graph neural network models\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vlsi.2024.102262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In recent years, the application of deep learning (DL) models has sparked considerable interest in timing prediction within the place-and-route (P&R) flow of IC chip design. Specifically, at the pre-route stage, an accurate prediction of post-route timing is challenging due to the lack of sufficient physical information. However, achieving precise timing prediction significantly accelerates the design closure process, saving considerable time and effort. In this work, we propose pre-route timing prediction and optimization framework with graph neural network (GNN) models combined with convolution neural network (CNN). Our framework is divided into two main stages, each of which is further subdivided into smaller steps. Precisely, our GNN-driven arc delay/slew prediction model is divided into two levels: in level-1, it predicts net resistance (net R) and net capacitance (net C) using GNN while the arc length is predicted using CNN. These predictions are hierarchically passed on to level-2 where delay/slew is estimated with our GNN based prediction model. The timing optimization model utilizes the precise delay/slew predictions obtained from the GNN-driven prediction model to accurately set the path margin during the timing optimization stage. This approach effectively reduces unnecessary turn-around iterations in the commercial EDA tools. Experimental results show that by using our proposed framework in P&R, we are able to improve the pre-route prediction accuracy by 42%/36% on average on arc delay/slew, and improve timing metrics in terms of WNS, TNS, and the number of timing violation paths by 77%, 77%, and 64%, which are an increase of 32%/35% on arc delay/slew and 30%, 20% and 31% on timing optimization compared with the existing DL prediction model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integration-The Vlsi Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integration-The Vlsi Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167926024001263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integration-The Vlsi Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167926024001263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pre-route timing prediction and optimization with graph neural network models
In recent years, the application of deep learning (DL) models has sparked considerable interest in timing prediction within the place-and-route (P&R) flow of IC chip design. Specifically, at the pre-route stage, an accurate prediction of post-route timing is challenging due to the lack of sufficient physical information. However, achieving precise timing prediction significantly accelerates the design closure process, saving considerable time and effort. In this work, we propose pre-route timing prediction and optimization framework with graph neural network (GNN) models combined with convolution neural network (CNN). Our framework is divided into two main stages, each of which is further subdivided into smaller steps. Precisely, our GNN-driven arc delay/slew prediction model is divided into two levels: in level-1, it predicts net resistance (net R) and net capacitance (net C) using GNN while the arc length is predicted using CNN. These predictions are hierarchically passed on to level-2 where delay/slew is estimated with our GNN based prediction model. The timing optimization model utilizes the precise delay/slew predictions obtained from the GNN-driven prediction model to accurately set the path margin during the timing optimization stage. This approach effectively reduces unnecessary turn-around iterations in the commercial EDA tools. Experimental results show that by using our proposed framework in P&R, we are able to improve the pre-route prediction accuracy by 42%/36% on average on arc delay/slew, and improve timing metrics in terms of WNS, TNS, and the number of timing violation paths by 77%, 77%, and 64%, which are an increase of 32%/35% on arc delay/slew and 30%, 20% and 31% on timing optimization compared with the existing DL prediction model.
期刊介绍:
Integration''s aim is to cover every aspect of the VLSI area, with an emphasis on cross-fertilization between various fields of science, and the design, verification, test and applications of integrated circuits and systems, as well as closely related topics in process and device technologies. Individual issues will feature peer-reviewed tutorials and articles as well as reviews of recent publications. The intended coverage of the journal can be assessed by examining the following (non-exclusive) list of topics:
Specification methods and languages; Analog/Digital Integrated Circuits and Systems; VLSI architectures; Algorithms, methods and tools for modeling, simulation, synthesis and verification of integrated circuits and systems of any complexity; Embedded systems; High-level synthesis for VLSI systems; Logic synthesis and finite automata; Testing, design-for-test and test generation algorithms; Physical design; Formal verification; Algorithms implemented in VLSI systems; Systems engineering; Heterogeneous systems.