Adriana P. C. Hermans , Dennis J. L. G. Schutter , Richard A. I. Bethlehem
{"title":"基于焦虑和躁狂的双相情感障碍 I 亚组的功能网络特征","authors":"Adriana P. C. Hermans , Dennis J. L. G. Schutter , Richard A. I. Bethlehem","doi":"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bipolar disorder I (BD-I) is a heterogeneous disorder with a high prevalence of comorbid anxiety. The aim of this study was to investigate whether anxiety and mania symptoms define distinct subgroups within BD-I and to explore potential differences in functional network characteristics between these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subgroups were identified using scores from clinical anxiety and mania scales. After dimension reduction of these scores, data-driven clustering analysis with cross-validation was employed to reveal the existence of subgroups. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans were pre-processed using fMRIPrep. After parcellation and network construction, global and regional graph theoretical measures were calculated per subgroup.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clustering results revealed that, based on anxiety symptomatology, subjects fell into two distinct subgroups, whereas mania symptoms divided subjects into four unique subgroups. These subgroups varied notably on several symptom scales. Network assortativity was significantly associated with anxiety subgroups. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant global functional network differences between the anxiety subgroups or between mania subgroups. Regional network differences between clinical subgroups were especially apparent for strength and degree in the temporal and frontal lobes.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Small sample size of some subgroups is a limitation of this study as is the categorical rather than continuous representation of anxiety and mania symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BD-I populations may be stratified into robust subgroups based on anxiety and mania symptoms, showing differences in functional network connectivity. Our findings highlight new avenues of research for investigating heterogeneity in psychiatric populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20776,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 111868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092549272400091X/pdfft?md5=33e5f02d749139163a7210db76c2fc8f&pid=1-s2.0-S092549272400091X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional network characteristics in anxiety- and mania-based subgroups of bipolar I disorder\",\"authors\":\"Adriana P. C. Hermans , Dennis J. L. G. Schutter , Richard A. I. Bethlehem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bipolar disorder I (BD-I) is a heterogeneous disorder with a high prevalence of comorbid anxiety. The aim of this study was to investigate whether anxiety and mania symptoms define distinct subgroups within BD-I and to explore potential differences in functional network characteristics between these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subgroups were identified using scores from clinical anxiety and mania scales. After dimension reduction of these scores, data-driven clustering analysis with cross-validation was employed to reveal the existence of subgroups. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans were pre-processed using fMRIPrep. After parcellation and network construction, global and regional graph theoretical measures were calculated per subgroup.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clustering results revealed that, based on anxiety symptomatology, subjects fell into two distinct subgroups, whereas mania symptoms divided subjects into four unique subgroups. These subgroups varied notably on several symptom scales. Network assortativity was significantly associated with anxiety subgroups. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant global functional network differences between the anxiety subgroups or between mania subgroups. Regional network differences between clinical subgroups were especially apparent for strength and degree in the temporal and frontal lobes.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Small sample size of some subgroups is a limitation of this study as is the categorical rather than continuous representation of anxiety and mania symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BD-I populations may be stratified into robust subgroups based on anxiety and mania symptoms, showing differences in functional network connectivity. Our findings highlight new avenues of research for investigating heterogeneity in psychiatric populations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"344 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092549272400091X/pdfft?md5=33e5f02d749139163a7210db76c2fc8f&pid=1-s2.0-S092549272400091X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092549272400091X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092549272400091X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional network characteristics in anxiety- and mania-based subgroups of bipolar I disorder
Background
Bipolar disorder I (BD-I) is a heterogeneous disorder with a high prevalence of comorbid anxiety. The aim of this study was to investigate whether anxiety and mania symptoms define distinct subgroups within BD-I and to explore potential differences in functional network characteristics between these subgroups.
Methods
Subgroups were identified using scores from clinical anxiety and mania scales. After dimension reduction of these scores, data-driven clustering analysis with cross-validation was employed to reveal the existence of subgroups. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans were pre-processed using fMRIPrep. After parcellation and network construction, global and regional graph theoretical measures were calculated per subgroup.
Results
Clustering results revealed that, based on anxiety symptomatology, subjects fell into two distinct subgroups, whereas mania symptoms divided subjects into four unique subgroups. These subgroups varied notably on several symptom scales. Network assortativity was significantly associated with anxiety subgroups. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant global functional network differences between the anxiety subgroups or between mania subgroups. Regional network differences between clinical subgroups were especially apparent for strength and degree in the temporal and frontal lobes.
Limitations
Small sample size of some subgroups is a limitation of this study as is the categorical rather than continuous representation of anxiety and mania symptoms.
Conclusions
BD-I populations may be stratified into robust subgroups based on anxiety and mania symptoms, showing differences in functional network connectivity. Our findings highlight new avenues of research for investigating heterogeneity in psychiatric populations.
期刊介绍:
The Neuroimaging section of Psychiatry Research publishes manuscripts on positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized electroencephalographic topography, regional cerebral blood flow, computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, autoradiography, post-mortem regional analyses, and other imaging techniques. Reports concerning results in psychiatric disorders, dementias, and the effects of behaviorial tasks and pharmacological treatments are featured. We also invite manuscripts on the methods of obtaining images and computer processing of the images themselves. Selected case reports are also published.