{"title":"评估深度车网一体化系统中电动汽车充电的优化使用时间定价","authors":"So Young Yang , JongRoul Woo , Wonjong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The expansion of electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy (RE) are the two major strategies countries are adopting to achieve energy transition. However, the discrepancy between intermittent RE generation and EV charging load may impose burden on the RE-dominant power grid of the future. For the issue, Time-of-Use (ToU) pricing for EV charging has been widely discussed or adopted as its potential is well acknowledged by previous studies. While ToU mechanism has been primarily based on drivers' price-responsive behavior, this research highlights that EV charging decisions are influenced by various factors beyond price, such as time of a day, charger accessibility and waiting time. Here, we conducted the discrete choice experiment to measure drivers' preferences for EV charging, and developed an EV charging behavior model which incorporated drivers' situational-responsiveness as well as price-responsiveness. Also, the model was used to design optimal ToU tariffs to minimize net-load variation. The results showed that strategic ToU tariffs can shift EV charging load, but achieving desirable load shifts requires a significant price gap. Additionally, combining ToU pricing with strategic deployment of charging infrastructure can effectively shift EV charging load, reducing RE curtailments by 22.14%, and LNG generation and carbon emissions by 10.12%, compared to the Business-as-Usual (BaU) scenario with current tariff rates. Thus, this study highlights the importance of flexible EV charging pricing and the importance of considering charging infrastructure deployment when designing EV ToU pricing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 107852"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing optimized time-of-use pricing for electric vehicle charging in deep vehicle-grid integration system\",\"authors\":\"So Young Yang , JongRoul Woo , Wonjong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The expansion of electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy (RE) are the two major strategies countries are adopting to achieve energy transition. However, the discrepancy between intermittent RE generation and EV charging load may impose burden on the RE-dominant power grid of the future. For the issue, Time-of-Use (ToU) pricing for EV charging has been widely discussed or adopted as its potential is well acknowledged by previous studies. While ToU mechanism has been primarily based on drivers' price-responsive behavior, this research highlights that EV charging decisions are influenced by various factors beyond price, such as time of a day, charger accessibility and waiting time. Here, we conducted the discrete choice experiment to measure drivers' preferences for EV charging, and developed an EV charging behavior model which incorporated drivers' situational-responsiveness as well as price-responsiveness. Also, the model was used to design optimal ToU tariffs to minimize net-load variation. The results showed that strategic ToU tariffs can shift EV charging load, but achieving desirable load shifts requires a significant price gap. Additionally, combining ToU pricing with strategic deployment of charging infrastructure can effectively shift EV charging load, reducing RE curtailments by 22.14%, and LNG generation and carbon emissions by 10.12%, compared to the Business-as-Usual (BaU) scenario with current tariff rates. Thus, this study highlights the importance of flexible EV charging pricing and the importance of considering charging infrastructure deployment when designing EV ToU pricing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324005607\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324005607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
电动汽车(EV)和可再生能源(RE)的发展是各国为实现能源转型而采取的两大战略。然而,间歇性可再生能源发电与电动汽车充电负荷之间的差异可能会对未来以可再生能源为主的电网造成负担。针对这一问题,电动汽车充电的使用时间(ToU)定价已被广泛讨论或采用,因为其潜力已得到以往研究的充分认可。虽然 ToU 机制主要基于驾驶员的价格反应行为,但本研究强调,电动汽车充电决策受价格以外的各种因素影响,如一天中的时间、充电器的可及性和等待时间。在此,我们进行了离散选择实验来测量驾驶者对电动汽车充电的偏好,并建立了一个电动汽车充电行为模型,该模型包含了驾驶者的情景响应和价格响应。此外,该模型还被用于设计最优的 ToU 电价,以最小化净负荷变化。结果表明,策略性 ToU 费率可以转移电动汽车充电负荷,但要实现理想的负荷转移需要很大的价格差距。此外,将 ToU 定价与充电基础设施的战略部署相结合,可以有效转移电动汽车充电负荷,与采用当前电价的 "一切照旧"(BaU)情景相比,可再生能源削减量减少了 22.14%,液化天然气发电量和碳排放量减少了 10.12%。因此,本研究强调了灵活的电动汽车充电定价的重要性,以及在设计电动汽车 ToU 定价时考虑充电基础设施部署的重要性。
Assessing optimized time-of-use pricing for electric vehicle charging in deep vehicle-grid integration system
The expansion of electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy (RE) are the two major strategies countries are adopting to achieve energy transition. However, the discrepancy between intermittent RE generation and EV charging load may impose burden on the RE-dominant power grid of the future. For the issue, Time-of-Use (ToU) pricing for EV charging has been widely discussed or adopted as its potential is well acknowledged by previous studies. While ToU mechanism has been primarily based on drivers' price-responsive behavior, this research highlights that EV charging decisions are influenced by various factors beyond price, such as time of a day, charger accessibility and waiting time. Here, we conducted the discrete choice experiment to measure drivers' preferences for EV charging, and developed an EV charging behavior model which incorporated drivers' situational-responsiveness as well as price-responsiveness. Also, the model was used to design optimal ToU tariffs to minimize net-load variation. The results showed that strategic ToU tariffs can shift EV charging load, but achieving desirable load shifts requires a significant price gap. Additionally, combining ToU pricing with strategic deployment of charging infrastructure can effectively shift EV charging load, reducing RE curtailments by 22.14%, and LNG generation and carbon emissions by 10.12%, compared to the Business-as-Usual (BaU) scenario with current tariff rates. Thus, this study highlights the importance of flexible EV charging pricing and the importance of considering charging infrastructure deployment when designing EV ToU pricing.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.