在渐进式亏缺灌溉条件下不同叶质的紫花苜蓿对干旱的响应

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21324
Meghyn Meeks, Ambika Chandra
{"title":"在渐进式亏缺灌溉条件下不同叶质的紫花苜蓿对干旱的响应","authors":"Meghyn Meeks, Ambika Chandra","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving drought resistance in Zoysiagrass (<jats:italic>Zoysia</jats:italic> spp.) is a target for both private and public breeding programs. The performance of 26 elite experimental zoysiagrasses was compared under progressive drought stress with Palisades, Diamond, and Zeon. Environmental conditions were warmer and drier in 2020 (66 days) than 2021 (45 days). Irrigation was applied once weekly using potential evapotranspiration (ET<jats:sub>o</jats:sub>) rates and crop coefficients (<jats:italic>K</jats:italic><jats:sub>c</jats:sub>) of 0.6 (non‐stress), or 0.40, 0.30, and 0.25 deficit treatments. Turfgrass quality, leaf wilt, normalized difference vegetative index, normalized difference red edge, and volumetric water content were recorded weekly. Genotypes with the highest means (statistical “a” group) contributed to a turfgrass performance index (TPI). Elite zoysiagrass with TPI ≥ Palisades (19) were <jats:italic>Zoysia japonica</jats:italic> Steud. ecotypes DALZ 1311 (22), 1601 (19), and 1603 (21), and finer textured interspecific hybrids, DALZ 1701 (18), 1713 (26), 1714 (18), and 1801 (24). Relative to an irrigation schedule using a 0.6 <jats:italic>K</jats:italic><jats:sub>c</jats:sub>, these genotypes survived extreme deficit irrigation, which conserved 40.1% (45,859.6 L) and 66.4% (44, 592.2 L) of water in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Overall, this study demonstrated that significant water consumption could be reduced with proper cultivar selection and deficit‐based irrigation management while maintaining an acceptable turfgrass quality under drought conditions.","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drought response of zoysiagrass with varying leaf texture under progressive deficit irrigation\",\"authors\":\"Meghyn Meeks, Ambika Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csc2.21324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improving drought resistance in Zoysiagrass (<jats:italic>Zoysia</jats:italic> spp.) is a target for both private and public breeding programs. The performance of 26 elite experimental zoysiagrasses was compared under progressive drought stress with Palisades, Diamond, and Zeon. Environmental conditions were warmer and drier in 2020 (66 days) than 2021 (45 days). Irrigation was applied once weekly using potential evapotranspiration (ET<jats:sub>o</jats:sub>) rates and crop coefficients (<jats:italic>K</jats:italic><jats:sub>c</jats:sub>) of 0.6 (non‐stress), or 0.40, 0.30, and 0.25 deficit treatments. Turfgrass quality, leaf wilt, normalized difference vegetative index, normalized difference red edge, and volumetric water content were recorded weekly. Genotypes with the highest means (statistical “a” group) contributed to a turfgrass performance index (TPI). Elite zoysiagrass with TPI ≥ Palisades (19) were <jats:italic>Zoysia japonica</jats:italic> Steud. ecotypes DALZ 1311 (22), 1601 (19), and 1603 (21), and finer textured interspecific hybrids, DALZ 1701 (18), 1713 (26), 1714 (18), and 1801 (24). Relative to an irrigation schedule using a 0.6 <jats:italic>K</jats:italic><jats:sub>c</jats:sub>, these genotypes survived extreme deficit irrigation, which conserved 40.1% (45,859.6 L) and 66.4% (44, 592.2 L) of water in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Overall, this study demonstrated that significant water consumption could be reduced with proper cultivar selection and deficit‐based irrigation management while maintaining an acceptable turfgrass quality under drought conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Science\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高紫草(Zoysia spp.)的抗旱性是私人和公共育种计划的目标。在渐进式干旱胁迫下,将 26 种精英实验用紫草的表现与 Palisades、Diamond 和 Zeon 进行了比较。2020 年(66 天)的环境条件比 2021 年(45 天)更温暖、更干燥。采用潜在蒸散(ETo)率和作物系数(Kc)为 0.6(无胁迫)或 0.40、0.30 和 0.25 的赤字处理,每周灌溉一次。每周记录草坪质量、叶片萎蔫、归一化植被指数差异、归一化红边差异和体积含水量。平均值最高的基因型(统计 "a "组)可获得草坪草性能指数(TPI)。生态型 DALZ 1311(22)、1601(19)和 1603(21),以及纹理较细的种间杂交种 DALZ 1701(18)、1713(26)、1714(18)和 1801(24)。相对于使用 0.6 Kc 的灌溉计划,这些基因型在 2020 年和 2021 年的极端亏缺灌溉中分别节水 40.1%(45,859.6 升)和 66.4%(44,592.2 升)。总之,该研究表明,在干旱条件下,通过适当的品种选择和亏缺灌溉管理,可以减少大量耗水,同时保持可接受的草坪质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drought response of zoysiagrass with varying leaf texture under progressive deficit irrigation
Improving drought resistance in Zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.) is a target for both private and public breeding programs. The performance of 26 elite experimental zoysiagrasses was compared under progressive drought stress with Palisades, Diamond, and Zeon. Environmental conditions were warmer and drier in 2020 (66 days) than 2021 (45 days). Irrigation was applied once weekly using potential evapotranspiration (ETo) rates and crop coefficients (Kc) of 0.6 (non‐stress), or 0.40, 0.30, and 0.25 deficit treatments. Turfgrass quality, leaf wilt, normalized difference vegetative index, normalized difference red edge, and volumetric water content were recorded weekly. Genotypes with the highest means (statistical “a” group) contributed to a turfgrass performance index (TPI). Elite zoysiagrass with TPI ≥ Palisades (19) were Zoysia japonica Steud. ecotypes DALZ 1311 (22), 1601 (19), and 1603 (21), and finer textured interspecific hybrids, DALZ 1701 (18), 1713 (26), 1714 (18), and 1801 (24). Relative to an irrigation schedule using a 0.6 Kc, these genotypes survived extreme deficit irrigation, which conserved 40.1% (45,859.6 L) and 66.4% (44, 592.2 L) of water in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Overall, this study demonstrated that significant water consumption could be reduced with proper cultivar selection and deficit‐based irrigation management while maintaining an acceptable turfgrass quality under drought conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信