浅色和深色颌面部皮肤复制品色差的可感知性和可接受性阈值

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Meral Kurt , Seçil Karakoca Nemli , Merve Bankoğlu Güngör , Bilge Turhan Bal , Ebru Öztürk
{"title":"浅色和深色颌面部皮肤复制品色差的可感知性和可接受性阈值","authors":"Meral Kurt ,&nbsp;Seçil Karakoca Nemli ,&nbsp;Merve Bankoğlu Güngör ,&nbsp;Bilge Turhan Bal ,&nbsp;Ebru Öztürk","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess the perceptibility and acceptability thresholds of maxillofacial silicones for light and dark skin colors and to evaluate the effect of gender and professional experience on these thresholds. Two different sets of specimens (as light and dark) each, consisting of 14 (25 × 25 × 6-mm<sup>3</sup>) silicone skin replications, were produced. Four specimens of each set were produced from the same silicon mixture of the relevant set and polymerized simultaneously to provide standardized fabrication conditions. These 4 light/dark specimens were assigned as “baseline color specimens (BCs)” in each set, while the other 10 specimens were produced with a color difference level that increased gradually from BC. These stepped levels were obtained by controlled increasing of the pigment concentration in the relevant baseline silicon mixture. Color difference levels of specimens were calculated by using the CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas. Observers comprised of 3 different professional experiences as first-year dental students, interns, and dentists (n = 30/group, gender-balanced) were included. Combinations consisting of 5 specimens with 4 BCs and 1 different color were shown to the observers to assess whether the color difference was perceptible or acceptable. Perceptibility and acceptability percentages were regressed with color difference levels to estimate the best fit curve and confidence intervals were calculated (α = 0.05). The highest estimation of the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) was found in the cubic curve for all parameters. A significant difference was found between the light and dark colors. The perceptibility thresholds (Δ<em>E</em>*<em><sub>ab</sub></em>/Δ<em>E<sub>00</sub></em>) were 0.8/0.59 and 2.63/1.75 for light and dark colors, respectively. The acceptability thresholds (Δ<em>E</em>*<em><sub>ab</sub></em>/Δ<em>E<sub>00</sub></em>) were 3.35/2.25, 10.07/7.04 for light and dark colors, respectively. No significant differences were found between gender and among experience groups concerning visual thresholds. Regardless of gender and experience, observers could perceive color differences more easily in light skin colors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for color differences of light and dark maxillofacial skin replications\",\"authors\":\"Meral Kurt ,&nbsp;Seçil Karakoca Nemli ,&nbsp;Merve Bankoğlu Güngör ,&nbsp;Bilge Turhan Bal ,&nbsp;Ebru Öztürk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess the perceptibility and acceptability thresholds of maxillofacial silicones for light and dark skin colors and to evaluate the effect of gender and professional experience on these thresholds. Two different sets of specimens (as light and dark) each, consisting of 14 (25 × 25 × 6-mm<sup>3</sup>) silicone skin replications, were produced. Four specimens of each set were produced from the same silicon mixture of the relevant set and polymerized simultaneously to provide standardized fabrication conditions. These 4 light/dark specimens were assigned as “baseline color specimens (BCs)” in each set, while the other 10 specimens were produced with a color difference level that increased gradually from BC. These stepped levels were obtained by controlled increasing of the pigment concentration in the relevant baseline silicon mixture. Color difference levels of specimens were calculated by using the CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas. Observers comprised of 3 different professional experiences as first-year dental students, interns, and dentists (n = 30/group, gender-balanced) were included. Combinations consisting of 5 specimens with 4 BCs and 1 different color were shown to the observers to assess whether the color difference was perceptible or acceptable. Perceptibility and acceptability percentages were regressed with color difference levels to estimate the best fit curve and confidence intervals were calculated (α = 0.05). The highest estimation of the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) was found in the cubic curve for all parameters. A significant difference was found between the light and dark colors. The perceptibility thresholds (Δ<em>E</em>*<em><sub>ab</sub></em>/Δ<em>E<sub>00</sub></em>) were 0.8/0.59 and 2.63/1.75 for light and dark colors, respectively. The acceptability thresholds (Δ<em>E</em>*<em><sub>ab</sub></em>/Δ<em>E<sub>00</sub></em>) were 3.35/2.25, 10.07/7.04 for light and dark colors, respectively. No significant differences were found between gender and among experience groups concerning visual thresholds. Regardless of gender and experience, observers could perceive color differences more easily in light skin colors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"223 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001184\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估颌面部硅胶对浅色和深色皮肤的可感知性和可接受性阈值,并评估性别和专业经验对这些阈值的影响。研究人员制作了两套不同的标本(浅色和深色),每套标本由 14 个(25 × 25 × 6 立方毫米)硅胶皮肤复制品组成。每组中的四个试样由相关组的相同硅混合物制成,并同时聚合,以提供标准化的制造条件。这 4 个浅色/深色试样被指定为每组中的 "基线色试样 (BC)",而其他 10 个试样的色差水平则从 BC 开始逐渐增加。这些阶梯水平是通过控制增加相关基线硅混合物中的颜料浓度获得的。试样的色差水平是通过 CIELAB 和 CIEDE2000 公式计算得出的。观察者包括牙科一年级学生、实习生和牙科医生 3 种不同的职业经历(n = 30/组,性别均衡)。向观察者展示由 5 个标本组成的 4 种 BC 和 1 种不同颜色的组合,以评估色差是否可感知或可接受。将可感知性和可接受性百分比与色差水平进行回归,以估计最佳拟合曲线,并计算置信区间(α = 0.05)。在所有参数的立方曲线中,判定系数 (R2) 估计值最高。浅色和深色之间存在明显差异。浅色和深色的可感知阈值(ΔE*ab/ΔE00)分别为 0.8/0.59 和 2.63/1.75。浅色和深色的可接受性阈值(ΔE*ab/ΔE00)分别为 3.35/2.25、10.07/7.04。在视觉阈值方面,不同性别和不同经验组之间没有发现明显差异。无论性别和经验如何,观察者更容易感知浅肤色的颜色差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for color differences of light and dark maxillofacial skin replications

The aim of this study was to assess the perceptibility and acceptability thresholds of maxillofacial silicones for light and dark skin colors and to evaluate the effect of gender and professional experience on these thresholds. Two different sets of specimens (as light and dark) each, consisting of 14 (25 × 25 × 6-mm3) silicone skin replications, were produced. Four specimens of each set were produced from the same silicon mixture of the relevant set and polymerized simultaneously to provide standardized fabrication conditions. These 4 light/dark specimens were assigned as “baseline color specimens (BCs)” in each set, while the other 10 specimens were produced with a color difference level that increased gradually from BC. These stepped levels were obtained by controlled increasing of the pigment concentration in the relevant baseline silicon mixture. Color difference levels of specimens were calculated by using the CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas. Observers comprised of 3 different professional experiences as first-year dental students, interns, and dentists (n = 30/group, gender-balanced) were included. Combinations consisting of 5 specimens with 4 BCs and 1 different color were shown to the observers to assess whether the color difference was perceptible or acceptable. Perceptibility and acceptability percentages were regressed with color difference levels to estimate the best fit curve and confidence intervals were calculated (α = 0.05). The highest estimation of the coefficient of determination (R2) was found in the cubic curve for all parameters. A significant difference was found between the light and dark colors. The perceptibility thresholds (ΔE*abE00) were 0.8/0.59 and 2.63/1.75 for light and dark colors, respectively. The acceptability thresholds (ΔE*abE00) were 3.35/2.25, 10.07/7.04 for light and dark colors, respectively. No significant differences were found between gender and among experience groups concerning visual thresholds. Regardless of gender and experience, observers could perceive color differences more easily in light skin colors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信