评估虚拟解剖台在物理治疗一年级学生解剖培训中的价值的 "道德 "协议的可行性

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"评估虚拟解剖台在物理治疗一年级学生解剖培训中的价值的 \"道德 \"协议的可行性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.kine.2024.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Virtual dissection tables would allow learning anatomy. The objectives were to study a new ethical protocol evaluating the impact of the tool and to give trends on the results of physiotherapy students.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Forty-two were randomized in 3 groups: a monograph reviser, a dissection table, a control group. Protocol validation criteria were established and completed and a series of evaluations were conducted. The groups have benefited from the same learning content.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all, 80% of feasibility criteria were validated. Students revising on the table obtained non-significantly higher results than intermediate (10.75/20) and final (19/20) evaluations compared to the monograph group (respectively 8.38/20, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.88 and 18/20, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.84) and control.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The protocol has good feasibility and trends in the value of the tool. This pilot study requires further work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35491,"journal":{"name":"Kinesitherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faisabilité d’un protocole « éthique » évaluant l’intérêt de la table de dissection virtuelle dans l’apprentissage de l’anatomie chez une population d’étudiants en 1ère année de masso-kinésithérapie\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.kine.2024.05.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Virtual dissection tables would allow learning anatomy. The objectives were to study a new ethical protocol evaluating the impact of the tool and to give trends on the results of physiotherapy students.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Forty-two were randomized in 3 groups: a monograph reviser, a dissection table, a control group. Protocol validation criteria were established and completed and a series of evaluations were conducted. The groups have benefited from the same learning content.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all, 80% of feasibility criteria were validated. Students revising on the table obtained non-significantly higher results than intermediate (10.75/20) and final (19/20) evaluations compared to the monograph group (respectively 8.38/20, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.88 and 18/20, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.84) and control.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The protocol has good feasibility and trends in the value of the tool. This pilot study requires further work.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinesitherapie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinesitherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1779012324001682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesitherapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1779012324001682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 虚拟解剖台将有助于学习解剖学。研究的目的是研究一种新的伦理协议,评估该工具的影响,并提供物理治疗学生学习结果的趋势。材料和方法42名学生被随机分为3组:专著修订者、解剖台、对照组。制定并完成了协议验证标准,并进行了一系列评估。结果 80%的可行性标准得到验证。与专著组(分别为 8.38/20,P = 0.88 和 18/20,P = 0.84)和对照组相比,在表格上进行修改的学生在中期评价(10.75/20)和最终评价(19/20)中获得的成绩均无显著性差异。这项试点研究还需要进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faisabilité d’un protocole « éthique » évaluant l’intérêt de la table de dissection virtuelle dans l’apprentissage de l’anatomie chez une population d’étudiants en 1ère année de masso-kinésithérapie

Introduction

Virtual dissection tables would allow learning anatomy. The objectives were to study a new ethical protocol evaluating the impact of the tool and to give trends on the results of physiotherapy students.

Material and method

Forty-two were randomized in 3 groups: a monograph reviser, a dissection table, a control group. Protocol validation criteria were established and completed and a series of evaluations were conducted. The groups have benefited from the same learning content.

Results

In all, 80% of feasibility criteria were validated. Students revising on the table obtained non-significantly higher results than intermediate (10.75/20) and final (19/20) evaluations compared to the monograph group (respectively 8.38/20, P = 0.88 and 18/20, P = 0.84) and control.

Discussion

The protocol has good feasibility and trends in the value of the tool. This pilot study requires further work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kinesitherapie
Kinesitherapie Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Kinésithérapie, la revue adresse aux praticiens et aux étudiants qui veulent lire des informations accessibles et utiles. Ce est la première revue francophone paramédicale à être indexée dans une base de données internationale - Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature : CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信