利用交互式在线学习模块改善执业前学生的学习和体验。

Megan E Stuffle
{"title":"利用交互式在线学习模块改善执业前学生的学习和体验。","authors":"Megan E Stuffle","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240513-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fundamentals of Nursing students at a large school of nursing in the Midwest reported difficulty using their course textbooks. There was also an increase in course failures and a decrease in performance on a Fundamentals of Nursing National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX-RN<sup>®</sup>) preparatory proctored examination.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pilot project was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive, online learning modules compared to textbook readings on student performance, access and use of resources, and student experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the pilot there was a significant improvement in course grades among traditional but not accelerated students using the modules compared to those using the textbook. Students reported that the modules were more engaging, cost-effective, and appealing to various learning styles. Weaknesses identified were the module lengths and technological concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The online, interactive modules engaged students with course materials, reduced costs, and may have changed student performance. Additional research is needed among students in other courses and programs. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Prelicensure Student Learning and Experience With Interactive Online Learning Modules.\",\"authors\":\"Megan E Stuffle\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20240513-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fundamentals of Nursing students at a large school of nursing in the Midwest reported difficulty using their course textbooks. There was also an increase in course failures and a decrease in performance on a Fundamentals of Nursing National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX-RN<sup>®</sup>) preparatory proctored examination.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pilot project was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive, online learning modules compared to textbook readings on student performance, access and use of resources, and student experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the pilot there was a significant improvement in course grades among traditional but not accelerated students using the modules compared to those using the textbook. Students reported that the modules were more engaging, cost-effective, and appealing to various learning styles. Weaknesses identified were the module lengths and technological concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The online, interactive modules engaged students with course materials, reduced costs, and may have changed student performance. Additional research is needed among students in other courses and programs. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240513-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240513-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国中西部一所大型护理学校的护理学基础专业学生报告称,他们在使用教材时遇到困难。此外,课程不及格率也有所上升,在护理学基础国家委员会执照考试 (NCLEX-RN®) 预备监考中的成绩也有所下降:实施了一个试点项目,以评估互动式在线学习模块与课本阅读相比,在学生成绩、资源访问和使用以及学生体验方面的效果:试点项目结束后,与使用教科书的学生相比,使用模块的传统学生(非速成学生)的课程成绩有了显著提高。学生们表示,这些模块更有吸引力,成本效益更高,而且对各种学习风格更有吸引力。不足之处在于模块的长度和技术问题:在线互动模块让学生参与到课程材料中,降低了成本,并可能改变了学生的学习成绩。需要在其他课程和项目的学生中开展更多研究。[J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Prelicensure Student Learning and Experience With Interactive Online Learning Modules.

Background: Fundamentals of Nursing students at a large school of nursing in the Midwest reported difficulty using their course textbooks. There was also an increase in course failures and a decrease in performance on a Fundamentals of Nursing National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX-RN®) preparatory proctored examination.

Method: A pilot project was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive, online learning modules compared to textbook readings on student performance, access and use of resources, and student experience.

Results: Following the pilot there was a significant improvement in course grades among traditional but not accelerated students using the modules compared to those using the textbook. Students reported that the modules were more engaging, cost-effective, and appealing to various learning styles. Weaknesses identified were the module lengths and technological concerns.

Conclusion: The online, interactive modules engaged students with course materials, reduced costs, and may have changed student performance. Additional research is needed among students in other courses and programs. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信