结肠镜检查前肠道准备引起的急性胃病。

Su Bee Park, Moonhyung Lee, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
{"title":"结肠镜检查前肠道准备引起的急性胃病。","authors":"Su Bee Park, Moonhyung Lee, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha","doi":"10.4166/kjg.2024.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Utilization of low-volume preparation agents is crucial to improve patient willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopies. However, gastric safety data on preparation agents are limited. This study evaluated the acute gastropathy associated with bowel preparation agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled healthy subjects who underwent both esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy screening. Baseline patient characteristics, bowel preparation success, acute gastropathy, and polyp and adenoma detection rates were evaluated for 1 L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (1 L PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablet (OST) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of the OST group (n=2,463) with the 1 L PEG/Asc group (n=2,060) revealed that the rates of successful cleansing and high-quality cleansing were similar between the two groups. Polyp and adenoma detection rates were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (<i>p</i><0.001 and <i>p</i>=0.013), while the incidence of acute gastric mucosal lesion-like blood stain/clot, erosions at greater curvature side of antrum/body, multiple erosions, and overlying mucosal erythema or edema were all significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (all <i>p</i><0.001). Additionally, high and indeterminate probability scores of preparation agent-induced gastropathy (<i>p</i>=0.001) and mean Lanza scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (1.3 vs. 0.4, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with 1 L PEG/Asc, OSTs were significantly associated with acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, thus requiring careful consideration from physicians for the simultaneous screening of EGD and colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94245,"journal":{"name":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Gastropathy Associated with Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Su Bee Park, Moonhyung Lee, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha\",\"doi\":\"10.4166/kjg.2024.068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Utilization of low-volume preparation agents is crucial to improve patient willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopies. However, gastric safety data on preparation agents are limited. This study evaluated the acute gastropathy associated with bowel preparation agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled healthy subjects who underwent both esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy screening. Baseline patient characteristics, bowel preparation success, acute gastropathy, and polyp and adenoma detection rates were evaluated for 1 L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (1 L PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablet (OST) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of the OST group (n=2,463) with the 1 L PEG/Asc group (n=2,060) revealed that the rates of successful cleansing and high-quality cleansing were similar between the two groups. Polyp and adenoma detection rates were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (<i>p</i><0.001 and <i>p</i>=0.013), while the incidence of acute gastric mucosal lesion-like blood stain/clot, erosions at greater curvature side of antrum/body, multiple erosions, and overlying mucosal erythema or edema were all significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (all <i>p</i><0.001). Additionally, high and indeterminate probability scores of preparation agent-induced gastropathy (<i>p</i>=0.001) and mean Lanza scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (1.3 vs. 0.4, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with 1 L PEG/Asc, OSTs were significantly associated with acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, thus requiring careful consideration from physicians for the simultaneous screening of EGD and colonoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2024.068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2024.068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:使用低容量制剂对于提高患者重复结肠镜检查的意愿至关重要。然而,有关肠道准备剂的胃部安全数据十分有限。本研究评估了与肠道准备剂相关的急性胃病:这项回顾性研究招募了接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查和结肠镜检查的健康受试者。对 1 升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸(1 升 PEG/Asc)组和口服硫酸片剂(OST)组的患者基线特征、肠道准备成功率、急性胃病、息肉和腺瘤检出率进行了评估:比较 OST 组(n=2,463)和 1 L PEG/Asc 组(n=2,060)发现,两组的成功清洁率和高质量清洁率相似。OST组的息肉和腺瘤检出率明显高于1 L PEG/Asc组(pp=0.013),而OST组的急性胃黏膜病变样血迹/凝块、胃窦/胃体大弯侧糜烂、多发糜烂、黏膜上覆红斑或水肿的发生率均明显高于1 L PEG/Asc组(均pp=0.001),OST 组的平均 Lanza 评分明显高于 1 L PEG/Asc 组(1.3 vs. 0.4,p结论:与 1 L PEG/Asc 相比,OST 与肠道准备期间的急性胃病有明显相关性,因此需要医生在同时进行胃肠镜检查和结肠镜检查时慎重考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Gastropathy Associated with Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

Background/aims: Utilization of low-volume preparation agents is crucial to improve patient willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopies. However, gastric safety data on preparation agents are limited. This study evaluated the acute gastropathy associated with bowel preparation agents.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled healthy subjects who underwent both esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy screening. Baseline patient characteristics, bowel preparation success, acute gastropathy, and polyp and adenoma detection rates were evaluated for 1 L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (1 L PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablet (OST) groups.

Results: Comparison of the OST group (n=2,463) with the 1 L PEG/Asc group (n=2,060) revealed that the rates of successful cleansing and high-quality cleansing were similar between the two groups. Polyp and adenoma detection rates were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (p<0.001 and p=0.013), while the incidence of acute gastric mucosal lesion-like blood stain/clot, erosions at greater curvature side of antrum/body, multiple erosions, and overlying mucosal erythema or edema were all significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (all p<0.001). Additionally, high and indeterminate probability scores of preparation agent-induced gastropathy (p=0.001) and mean Lanza scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (1.3 vs. 0.4, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Compared with 1 L PEG/Asc, OSTs were significantly associated with acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, thus requiring careful consideration from physicians for the simultaneous screening of EGD and colonoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信