结构化护理目标讨论在胸外科重症患者中的作用。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Christine E Alvarado, Stephanie G Worrell, Aaron E Tipton, Max Coffey, Boxiang Jiang, Philip A Linden, Christopher W Towe
{"title":"结构化护理目标讨论在胸外科重症患者中的作用。","authors":"Christine E Alvarado, Stephanie G Worrell, Aaron E Tipton, Max Coffey, Boxiang Jiang, Philip A Linden, Christopher W Towe","doi":"10.1177/08258597241274163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. <b>Results:</b> In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, <i>P</i> = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, <i>P</i> = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, <i>P</i> = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, <i>P</i> = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, <i>P</i> = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. <b>Discussion:</b> Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Structured Goals of Care Discussions in Critically Ill Thoracic Surgery Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Christine E Alvarado, Stephanie G Worrell, Aaron E Tipton, Max Coffey, Boxiang Jiang, Philip A Linden, Christopher W Towe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08258597241274163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. <b>Results:</b> In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, <i>P</i> = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, <i>P</i> = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, <i>P</i> = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, <i>P</i> = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, <i>P</i> = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. <b>Discussion:</b> Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241274163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241274163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国外科学院建议对高风险手术患者召开结构化家庭会议(FM)。我们假设,对于濒临死亡的胸外科患者,以家庭会议、多学科家庭会议或姑息治疗咨询(PCC)形式进行的护理目标讨论(GOCD)未得到充分利用。方法:在一家三级学术医疗中心对所有胸外科手术后死亡和出院安宁疗护的住院病人进行了回顾性病历审查。比较了两组患者对 GOCD 的使用情况。次要结果包括住院时间、初始GOCD期间的昏迷状态和呼吸机依赖性以及代码状态改变的时间。结果共有 56 名患者符合纳入标准:56人中有44人(78.6%)死亡,12人(21.4%)出院接受临终关怀。大多数患者有FM(79.5%的死亡率与100%的临终关怀率,P = .29),很少有MDFM(25.0%的死亡率与25.0%的临终关怀率,P = 1.00)。出院后接受安宁疗护的患者更有可能患有PCC(66.7% vs 31.2%,P = .03),在最初的GOCD期间昏迷(16.7% vs 59.1%,P = .009)或依赖呼吸机的可能性较小(16.7% vs 70.5%,P = .001)。在死亡的 DNR-CC(不进行复苏-舒适护理;44 例中有 37 例)患者中,75.7% 的患者在代码状态改变的当天死亡,67.6% 的患者在初始 GOCD 的 48 小时内死亡。讨论:虽然FM很常见,但MDFM却不常见。出院后接受临终关怀的患者更有可能出现 PCC。大多数死亡发生在初始GOCD后不久,而大多数代码状态变化发生在死亡当天。这些数据表明,有机会改进胸外科重症患者的 GOCD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Structured Goals of Care Discussions in Critically Ill Thoracic Surgery Patients.

Objective: The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. Results: In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, P = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, P = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, P = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, P = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, P = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. Discussion: Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信