Drew H Redepenning, Shivaali Maddali, Olivia A Glotfelty-Scheuering, Jessica B Berry, Brad E Dicianno
{"title":"急性创伤性脊髓损伤消化道出血的发生率、时间和风险因素:系统综述。","authors":"Drew H Redepenning, Shivaali Maddali, Olivia A Glotfelty-Scheuering, Jessica B Berry, Brad E Dicianno","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2391593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Current guidelines recommend four weeks of stress ulcer prophylaxis following traumatic spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the current literature on the incidence, timing, and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding/clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in the acute setting following a traumatic spinal cord injury and whether the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the rates of gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The average rate of gastrointestinal bleeding among all studies was 5.5% (95% CI = 5.4-5.6%; <i>n</i> = 26,576). The average rate of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding was 1.8% (95% CI = 1.79-1.82%; <i>n</i> = 3,857). The mean time since injury to when gastrointestinal bleeding occurred ranged from 5 to 22.5 days. For clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding the average time was 16 days or less. Those with cervical injuries had a higher incidence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding compared to those with non-cervical injuries (2.7% vs. 0.7%). No study found any difference in the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in participants with or without gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall incidence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding among studies was found to be low. Individuals with non-cervical injury were not found to be at high risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. There was also insufficient evidence to indicate that use of stress ulcer prophylaxis reduces the rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in those with traumatic spinal cord injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence, timing, and risk factors for development of gastrointestinal bleeding in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Drew H Redepenning, Shivaali Maddali, Olivia A Glotfelty-Scheuering, Jessica B Berry, Brad E Dicianno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2391593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Current guidelines recommend four weeks of stress ulcer prophylaxis following traumatic spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the current literature on the incidence, timing, and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding/clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in the acute setting following a traumatic spinal cord injury and whether the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the rates of gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The average rate of gastrointestinal bleeding among all studies was 5.5% (95% CI = 5.4-5.6%; <i>n</i> = 26,576). The average rate of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding was 1.8% (95% CI = 1.79-1.82%; <i>n</i> = 3,857). The mean time since injury to when gastrointestinal bleeding occurred ranged from 5 to 22.5 days. For clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding the average time was 16 days or less. Those with cervical injuries had a higher incidence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding compared to those with non-cervical injuries (2.7% vs. 0.7%). No study found any difference in the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in participants with or without gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall incidence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding among studies was found to be low. Individuals with non-cervical injury were not found to be at high risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. There was also insufficient evidence to indicate that use of stress ulcer prophylaxis reduces the rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in those with traumatic spinal cord injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391593\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前的指南建议在创伤性脊髓损伤后进行为期四周的应激性溃疡预防:评估有关创伤性脊髓损伤后急性期消化道出血/临床上重要的消化道出血的发生率、时间和风险因素的现有文献,以及使用应激性溃疡预防措施是否能降低消化道出血率:按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统综述:共有 24 篇文章符合纳入/排除标准。所有研究中胃肠道出血的平均发生率为 5.5%(95% CI = 5.4-5.6%;n = 26,576)。具有临床意义的消化道出血平均发生率为 1.8%(95% CI = 1.79-1.82%;n = 3857)。从受伤到发生消化道出血的平均时间为 5 到 22.5 天。有临床意义的消化道出血的平均时间为 16 天或更短。与非颈椎受伤者相比,颈椎受伤者发生临床上重要的消化道出血的几率更高(2.7% 对 0.7%)。没有研究发现有或没有消化道出血的参与者在使用应激性溃疡预防措施方面存在任何差异:结论:研究发现,临床上重要的消化道出血的总体发生率较低。非颈椎损伤患者发生临床上重要的消化道出血的风险并不高。此外,也没有足够的证据表明使用应激性溃疡预防措施可降低创伤性脊髓损伤患者的消化道出血率。
Incidence, timing, and risk factors for development of gastrointestinal bleeding in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review.
Context: Current guidelines recommend four weeks of stress ulcer prophylaxis following traumatic spinal cord injury.
Objectives: Assess the current literature on the incidence, timing, and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding/clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in the acute setting following a traumatic spinal cord injury and whether the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the rates of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Methods: A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
Results: A total of 24 articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The average rate of gastrointestinal bleeding among all studies was 5.5% (95% CI = 5.4-5.6%; n = 26,576). The average rate of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding was 1.8% (95% CI = 1.79-1.82%; n = 3,857). The mean time since injury to when gastrointestinal bleeding occurred ranged from 5 to 22.5 days. For clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding the average time was 16 days or less. Those with cervical injuries had a higher incidence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding compared to those with non-cervical injuries (2.7% vs. 0.7%). No study found any difference in the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in participants with or without gastrointestinal bleeding.
Conclusions: The overall incidence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding among studies was found to be low. Individuals with non-cervical injury were not found to be at high risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. There was also insufficient evidence to indicate that use of stress ulcer prophylaxis reduces the rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in those with traumatic spinal cord injury.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.