使用或不使用输尿管入路鞘的逆行肾内手术:随机对照试验的系统性回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim, Marcelo Esteves Chaves Campos, Lígia Sant'Ana Dumont, José Augusto Rojas Peñafiel, Eliabe Silva de Abreu, Giovanni Scala Marchini, Manoj Monga, Eduardo Mazzucchi
{"title":"使用或不使用输尿管入路鞘的逆行肾内手术:随机对照试验的系统性回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim, Marcelo Esteves Chaves Campos, Lígia Sant'Ana Dumont, José Augusto Rojas Peñafiel, Eliabe Silva de Abreu, Giovanni Scala Marchini, Manoj Monga, Eduardo Mazzucchi","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a medical device that enables repeated entrance into the ureter and collecting system during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Its impact on stone-free rates, ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing RIRS with versus without UAS for urolithiasis management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare outcomes from retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stone extraction with or without ureteral access sheath (UAS); evaluating stone-free rate (SFR), ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety outcomes of UAS use in RIRS for urolithiasis treatment. Articles published between 2014 and 2024 were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs comprising 466 procedures were included. Of these, 246 (52.7%) utilized UAS. The follow-up ranged from 1 week to 1 month. UAS reduced the incidence of postoperative fever (RR 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.84; p=0.009), and postoperative infection (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.83; p=0.008). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of SFR (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; p=0.10), ureteral injuries (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.95-1.75; p=0.11), operative time (MD 3.56 minutes; 95% CI -4.15 to 11.27 minutes; p=0.36), or length of stay (MD 0.32 days; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.07 days; p=0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UAS leads to a lower rate of post-operative fever and infection. However, UAS did not significantly reduce or increase the SFR or the rate of ureteral injuries during RIRS for patients with urolithiasis. The use of UAS should be considered to decrease the risk of infectious complications, particularly in those who may be at higher risk for such complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"50 ","pages":"670-682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrograde intrarenal surgery with or without ureteral access sheath: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim, Marcelo Esteves Chaves Campos, Lígia Sant'Ana Dumont, José Augusto Rojas Peñafiel, Eliabe Silva de Abreu, Giovanni Scala Marchini, Manoj Monga, Eduardo Mazzucchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a medical device that enables repeated entrance into the ureter and collecting system during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Its impact on stone-free rates, ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing RIRS with versus without UAS for urolithiasis management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare outcomes from retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stone extraction with or without ureteral access sheath (UAS); evaluating stone-free rate (SFR), ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety outcomes of UAS use in RIRS for urolithiasis treatment. Articles published between 2014 and 2024 were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs comprising 466 procedures were included. Of these, 246 (52.7%) utilized UAS. The follow-up ranged from 1 week to 1 month. UAS reduced the incidence of postoperative fever (RR 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.84; p=0.009), and postoperative infection (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.83; p=0.008). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of SFR (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; p=0.10), ureteral injuries (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.95-1.75; p=0.11), operative time (MD 3.56 minutes; 95% CI -4.15 to 11.27 minutes; p=0.36), or length of stay (MD 0.32 days; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.07 days; p=0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UAS leads to a lower rate of post-operative fever and infection. However, UAS did not significantly reduce or increase the SFR or the rate of ureteral injuries during RIRS for patients with urolithiasis. The use of UAS should be considered to decrease the risk of infectious complications, particularly in those who may be at higher risk for such complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Braz J Urol\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"670-682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554284/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Braz J Urol\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0452\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介输尿管入路鞘(UAS)是一种医疗设备,可在逆行肾内手术(RIRS)中反复进入输尿管和集尿系统。它对无结石率、输尿管损伤、手术时间和术后并发症的影响仍存在争议。目的:比较使用或不使用输尿管通道鞘(UAS)进行逆行肾内手术(RIRS)取石的结果;评估无石率(SFR)、输尿管损伤、手术时间和术后并发症:我们在 2024 年 6 月对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统检索,以寻找评估在 RIRS 中使用 UAS 治疗尿路结石的有效性和安全性的随机对照试验 (RCT)。研究纳入了 2014 年至 2024 年间发表的文章。分别计算了二元和连续结果的汇总风险比(RRs)和平均差(MDs):结果:共纳入了 5 项 RCT,包括 466 项手术。其中 246 例(52.7%)使用了 UAS。随访时间从 1 周到 1 个月不等。UAS 降低了术后发热(RR 0.49;95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.29-0.84;P=0.009)和术后感染(RR 0.50;95% CI 0.30-0.83;P=0.008)的发生率。在SFR(RR 1.05;95% CI 0.99-1.11;P=0.10)、输尿管损伤(RR 1.29;95% CI 0.95-1.75;P=0.11)、手术时间(MD 3.56分钟;95% CI -4.15至11.27分钟;P=0.36)或住院时间(MD 0.32天;95% CI -0.42至1.07天;P=0.40)方面,组间无明显差异:UAS可降低术后发热和感染率。结论:UAS 可降低术后发热和感染率,但 UAS 并未明显降低或增加 RIRS 期间尿石症患者的 SFR 或输尿管损伤率。应考虑使用 UAS 来降低感染并发症的风险,尤其是那些可能出现此类并发症的高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrograde intrarenal surgery with or without ureteral access sheath: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a medical device that enables repeated entrance into the ureter and collecting system during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Its impact on stone-free rates, ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing RIRS with versus without UAS for urolithiasis management.

Purpose: To compare outcomes from retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stone extraction with or without ureteral access sheath (UAS); evaluating stone-free rate (SFR), ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications.

Materials and methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety outcomes of UAS use in RIRS for urolithiasis treatment. Articles published between 2014 and 2024 were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.

Results: Five RCTs comprising 466 procedures were included. Of these, 246 (52.7%) utilized UAS. The follow-up ranged from 1 week to 1 month. UAS reduced the incidence of postoperative fever (RR 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.84; p=0.009), and postoperative infection (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.83; p=0.008). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of SFR (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; p=0.10), ureteral injuries (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.95-1.75; p=0.11), operative time (MD 3.56 minutes; 95% CI -4.15 to 11.27 minutes; p=0.36), or length of stay (MD 0.32 days; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.07 days; p=0.40).

Conclusion: UAS leads to a lower rate of post-operative fever and infection. However, UAS did not significantly reduce or increase the SFR or the rate of ureteral injuries during RIRS for patients with urolithiasis. The use of UAS should be considered to decrease the risk of infectious complications, particularly in those who may be at higher risk for such complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信