[动脉高血压患者对数字技术使用障碍的认识和识别]。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medicina-buenos Aires Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Rodrigo Sabio, Walter Espeche, Jessica Barochiner, Alejandro Díaz, Pedro Grosse, Roberto Flores, Roberto Parodi, José Romano, Alejandra Gaydou, Nicolas Renna
{"title":"[动脉高血压患者对数字技术使用障碍的认识和识别]。","authors":"Rodrigo Sabio, Walter Espeche, Jessica Barochiner, Alejandro Díaz, Pedro Grosse, Roberto Flores, Roberto Parodi, José Romano, Alejandra Gaydou, Nicolas Renna","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic devices and communication technologies are increasingly used to provide medical care to patients with high blood pressure. The main objective was to evaluate doctors' perception on the usefulness of digital technologies in hypertension. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of use of digital technologies in the follow-up of patients with hypertension and to identify the barriers perceived by doctors for their implementation in the Argentine Republic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study, based on a self-administered questionnaire, in the Argentine Republic, and coordinated by the Epidemiology group of the Argentine Society of Arterial Hypertension.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Doctors who care for patients with high blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>247 responses were obtained, 35.6% were women and 64.4% men; 92.3% indicated that the use of digital technologies was useful to improve therapeutic adherence; 54.7% received blood pressure results at home through some digital means; 41.3% regularly carry out teleconsultations, only 6.1% through specific digital health platforms, 29.1% through non-specific platforms, by telephone 21.9% and by email (asynchronous) 10.9%. The main perceived barriers were: availability, financial remuneration, regulations, connectivity problems and lack of time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perception of professionals is favorable, as they considered these technologies useful to improve therapeutic adherence, which could have a facilitating effect on their implementation, although the perceived barriers are part of organizational issues to be resolved.</p>","PeriodicalId":18419,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-buenos Aires","volume":"84 4","pages":"629-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Perception and identification of barriers to the use of digital technologies in arterial hypertension].\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Sabio, Walter Espeche, Jessica Barochiner, Alejandro Díaz, Pedro Grosse, Roberto Flores, Roberto Parodi, José Romano, Alejandra Gaydou, Nicolas Renna\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic devices and communication technologies are increasingly used to provide medical care to patients with high blood pressure. The main objective was to evaluate doctors' perception on the usefulness of digital technologies in hypertension. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of use of digital technologies in the follow-up of patients with hypertension and to identify the barriers perceived by doctors for their implementation in the Argentine Republic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study, based on a self-administered questionnaire, in the Argentine Republic, and coordinated by the Epidemiology group of the Argentine Society of Arterial Hypertension.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Doctors who care for patients with high blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>247 responses were obtained, 35.6% were women and 64.4% men; 92.3% indicated that the use of digital technologies was useful to improve therapeutic adherence; 54.7% received blood pressure results at home through some digital means; 41.3% regularly carry out teleconsultations, only 6.1% through specific digital health platforms, 29.1% through non-specific platforms, by telephone 21.9% and by email (asynchronous) 10.9%. The main perceived barriers were: availability, financial remuneration, regulations, connectivity problems and lack of time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perception of professionals is favorable, as they considered these technologies useful to improve therapeutic adherence, which could have a facilitating effect on their implementation, although the perceived barriers are part of organizational issues to be resolved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-buenos Aires\",\"volume\":\"84 4\",\"pages\":\"629-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-buenos Aires\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-buenos Aires","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介电子设备和通信技术越来越多地被用于为高血压患者提供医疗服务。研究的主要目的是评估医生对数字技术在高血压治疗中的作用的看法。次要目标是评估数字技术在高血压患者随访中的使用率,并确定阿根廷共和国医生在使用数字技术时遇到的障碍:观察性、横断面、多中心研究,以阿根廷共和国的自填问卷为基础,由阿根廷动脉高血压学会流行病学小组负责协调:结果:共收到 247 份回复,其中女性占 35.6%,男性占 64.4%;92.3% 的人表示使用数字技术有助于提高治疗依从性;54.7% 的人通过某种数字手段在家中收到血压结果;41.3% 的人定期进行远程会诊,只有 6.1%的人通过特定的数字健康平台,29.1% 的人通过非特定平台,21.9% 的人通过电话,10.9% 的人通过电子邮件(异步)。认为存在的主要障碍是:可用性、经济报酬、法规、连接问题和缺乏时间:专业人员的看法是好的,因为他们认为这些技术对改善治疗依从性很有用,这可能会对其实施产生促进作用,尽管所认为的障碍是有待解决的组织问题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Perception and identification of barriers to the use of digital technologies in arterial hypertension].

Introduction: Electronic devices and communication technologies are increasingly used to provide medical care to patients with high blood pressure. The main objective was to evaluate doctors' perception on the usefulness of digital technologies in hypertension. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of use of digital technologies in the follow-up of patients with hypertension and to identify the barriers perceived by doctors for their implementation in the Argentine Republic.

Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study, based on a self-administered questionnaire, in the Argentine Republic, and coordinated by the Epidemiology group of the Argentine Society of Arterial Hypertension.

Population: Doctors who care for patients with high blood pressure.

Results: 247 responses were obtained, 35.6% were women and 64.4% men; 92.3% indicated that the use of digital technologies was useful to improve therapeutic adherence; 54.7% received blood pressure results at home through some digital means; 41.3% regularly carry out teleconsultations, only 6.1% through specific digital health platforms, 29.1% through non-specific platforms, by telephone 21.9% and by email (asynchronous) 10.9%. The main perceived barriers were: availability, financial remuneration, regulations, connectivity problems and lack of time.

Conclusion: The perception of professionals is favorable, as they considered these technologies useful to improve therapeutic adherence, which could have a facilitating effect on their implementation, although the perceived barriers are part of organizational issues to be resolved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-buenos Aires
Medicina-buenos Aires 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信