[阿根廷共同护理规划(ACP-SEs)自我效能感量表]。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medicina-buenos Aires Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Stella Di Gennaro, Julia Fila, Verónica Veloso, Cristina Lasmarías, Vilma A Tripodoro
{"title":"[阿根廷共同护理规划(ACP-SEs)自我效能感量表]。","authors":"Stella Di Gennaro, Julia Fila, Verónica Veloso, Cristina Lasmarías, Vilma A Tripodoro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shared care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative and structured process involving the sick person and his or her caring environment. Health professionals recognize barriers to initiating ACP.Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) To crossculturally adapt the ACP self-efficacy scale in Spanish for Argentina (ACP-SEs); 2) To explore the reliability and validity of the scale; and 3) To explore self-efficacy in ACP in Argentinean professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Exploratory instrumental study carried out on health professionals who assist patients with advanced chronic diseases, interdisciplinary through a comprehension test of the ACP-SEs instrument and psychometric validation in a purposive sample of professionals. Sociodemographic variables and previous experience were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the comprehension test and linguistic adaptation of the scale through cognitive testing with eight professionals with experience with advanced chronic patients, the ACP-SEs Ar version of the scale was achieved. 236 professionals participated in the exploration, 83% attended patients with advanced chronic disease, 52.9 % were physicians, 52% received informal training in ACP, and 11% had a personal advance directive document. The scale's internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). Questions about prognosis, treatment options, goals, treatment preferences, and reassessment of goals of care showed significant differences between physicians and nonphysicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We explored PCA self-efficacy in health professionals with the ACP-SEs Ar scale validated for the first time in Argentina.</p>","PeriodicalId":18419,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-buenos Aires","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Perceived self-efficacy scale on shared care planning (ACP-SEs) Argentina].\",\"authors\":\"Stella Di Gennaro, Julia Fila, Verónica Veloso, Cristina Lasmarías, Vilma A Tripodoro\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shared care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative and structured process involving the sick person and his or her caring environment. Health professionals recognize barriers to initiating ACP.Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) To crossculturally adapt the ACP self-efficacy scale in Spanish for Argentina (ACP-SEs); 2) To explore the reliability and validity of the scale; and 3) To explore self-efficacy in ACP in Argentinean professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Exploratory instrumental study carried out on health professionals who assist patients with advanced chronic diseases, interdisciplinary through a comprehension test of the ACP-SEs instrument and psychometric validation in a purposive sample of professionals. Sociodemographic variables and previous experience were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the comprehension test and linguistic adaptation of the scale through cognitive testing with eight professionals with experience with advanced chronic patients, the ACP-SEs Ar version of the scale was achieved. 236 professionals participated in the exploration, 83% attended patients with advanced chronic disease, 52.9 % were physicians, 52% received informal training in ACP, and 11% had a personal advance directive document. The scale's internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). Questions about prognosis, treatment options, goals, treatment preferences, and reassessment of goals of care showed significant differences between physicians and nonphysicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We explored PCA self-efficacy in health professionals with the ACP-SEs Ar scale validated for the first time in Argentina.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-buenos Aires\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-buenos Aires\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-buenos Aires","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介共同护理计划(ACP)是一个涉及病人及其护理环境的反思、审议和结构化过程。医护人员认识到启动共同护理计划的障碍。自我效能感是预测学习过程成功与否的主要因素之一:1)跨文化调整阿根廷西班牙语 ACP 自我效能感量表(ACP-SEs);2)探讨该量表的可靠性和有效性;3)探讨阿根廷专业人员的 ACP 自我效能感:方法:对协助晚期慢性病患者的医疗专业人员进行探索性工具研究,通过对 ACP-SEs 工具进行理解测试,并在特定专业人员样本中进行心理测量验证,实现跨学科研究。对社会人口变量和以往经验进行了分析:结果:通过对 8 名具有晚期慢性病患者经验的专业人员进行认知测试,对量表进行了理解测试和语言调整,最终形成了 ACP-SEs Ar 版量表。236名专业人员参与了此次研究,其中83%为晚期慢性病患者,52.9%为医生,52%接受过ACP非正式培训,11%拥有个人预嘱文件。量表的内部一致性很高(Cronbach's alpha = 0.89)。有关预后、治疗方案、目标、治疗偏好和护理目标重新评估的问题在医生和非医生之间存在显著差异:我们通过首次在阿根廷验证的 ACP-SEs Ar 量表对医疗专业人员的 PCA 自我效能进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Perceived self-efficacy scale on shared care planning (ACP-SEs) Argentina].

Introduction: Shared care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative and structured process involving the sick person and his or her caring environment. Health professionals recognize barriers to initiating ACP.Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes.

Objectives: 1) To crossculturally adapt the ACP self-efficacy scale in Spanish for Argentina (ACP-SEs); 2) To explore the reliability and validity of the scale; and 3) To explore self-efficacy in ACP in Argentinean professionals.

Method: Exploratory instrumental study carried out on health professionals who assist patients with advanced chronic diseases, interdisciplinary through a comprehension test of the ACP-SEs instrument and psychometric validation in a purposive sample of professionals. Sociodemographic variables and previous experience were analyzed.

Results: After the comprehension test and linguistic adaptation of the scale through cognitive testing with eight professionals with experience with advanced chronic patients, the ACP-SEs Ar version of the scale was achieved. 236 professionals participated in the exploration, 83% attended patients with advanced chronic disease, 52.9 % were physicians, 52% received informal training in ACP, and 11% had a personal advance directive document. The scale's internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). Questions about prognosis, treatment options, goals, treatment preferences, and reassessment of goals of care showed significant differences between physicians and nonphysicians.

Conclusion: We explored PCA self-efficacy in health professionals with the ACP-SEs Ar scale validated for the first time in Argentina.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-buenos Aires
Medicina-buenos Aires 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信