女性乳房表面积对休息时和热身运动后皮肤僵硬度和触觉敏感度的影响。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Hannah Blount, Alessandro Valenza, Jade Ward, Silvia Caggiari, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri
{"title":"女性乳房表面积对休息时和热身运动后皮肤僵硬度和触觉敏感度的影响。","authors":"Hannah Blount,&nbsp;Alessandro Valenza,&nbsp;Jade Ward,&nbsp;Silvia Caggiari,&nbsp;Peter R. Worsley,&nbsp;Davide Filingeri","doi":"10.1113/EP091990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and after exercise in the heat remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity in 20 young to middle-aged women (27 ± 8 years of age) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147–502 cm<sup>2</sup>) at rest and after a submaximal run in a warm climatic chamber (32<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <annotation>${\\mathrm{C}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> ± <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>0</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>.</mo>\n <mn>6</mn>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mo>;</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${\\mathrm{0}}{\\mathrm{.6C;}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 53% ± 1.7% relative humidity). Skin stiffness above and below the nipple and tactile sensitivity from the nipple down were measured. Associations between BrSA and both skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest were determined via correlation analyses. Effects of exercise and test site were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. Skin stiffness was positively correlated with BrSA 3 cm above the areola edge (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>P </i>= 0.005) and at the superior areola border (<i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>P </i>= 0.016), but not below the nipple (<i>P </i>&gt; 0.05). The area 3 cm below the areola was also significantly stiffer than all other test sites (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.043). Tactile sensitivity did not vary with BrSA (<i>P </i>&gt; 0.09), but it varied across the breast (i.e., the area 3 cm below the areola was more sensitive than the inferior areola edge; <i>P </i>= 0.018). Skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity across the breast decreased after exercise by ∼37% (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.001) and ∼45% (<i>P </i>= 0.008), respectively. These findings expand our fundamental understanding of the mechanosensory properties of the female breast, and they could help to inform sportswear innovation to better meet the support needs of women of different breast sizes at rest and following exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":"109 10","pages":"1698-1709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of female breast surface area on skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and following exercise in the heat\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Blount,&nbsp;Alessandro Valenza,&nbsp;Jade Ward,&nbsp;Silvia Caggiari,&nbsp;Peter R. Worsley,&nbsp;Davide Filingeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP091990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and after exercise in the heat remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity in 20 young to middle-aged women (27 ± 8 years of age) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147–502 cm<sup>2</sup>) at rest and after a submaximal run in a warm climatic chamber (32<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <annotation>${\\\\mathrm{C}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> ± <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>.</mo>\\n <mn>6</mn>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mo>;</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>${\\\\mathrm{0}}{\\\\mathrm{.6C;}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 53% ± 1.7% relative humidity). Skin stiffness above and below the nipple and tactile sensitivity from the nipple down were measured. Associations between BrSA and both skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest were determined via correlation analyses. Effects of exercise and test site were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. Skin stiffness was positively correlated with BrSA 3 cm above the areola edge (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>P </i>= 0.005) and at the superior areola border (<i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>P </i>= 0.016), but not below the nipple (<i>P </i>&gt; 0.05). The area 3 cm below the areola was also significantly stiffer than all other test sites (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.043). Tactile sensitivity did not vary with BrSA (<i>P </i>&gt; 0.09), but it varied across the breast (i.e., the area 3 cm below the areola was more sensitive than the inferior areola edge; <i>P </i>= 0.018). Skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity across the breast decreased after exercise by ∼37% (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.001) and ∼45% (<i>P </i>= 0.008), respectively. These findings expand our fundamental understanding of the mechanosensory properties of the female breast, and they could help to inform sportswear innovation to better meet the support needs of women of different breast sizes at rest and following exercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\"109 10\",\"pages\":\"1698-1709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

女性的发育包括整个乳房形态的重大变化。然而,乳房表面积(BrSA)的差异是否会改变休息时和热身运动后乳房皮肤的硬度和触觉敏感度,目前仍不清楚。我们在温暖的气候室(32 C ${mathrm{C}}$ ± 0 . 6 C ; ${\mathrm{0}}\mathrm{.6C;}}$ 53% ± 1.7%相对湿度)中研究了20名不同乳房大小的中青年女性(27 ± 8岁)(BrSA范围:147-502 cm2)在静止状态和亚极限运动后的BrSA与皮肤硬度和触觉敏感度之间的关系。测量了乳头上下的皮肤硬度和乳头以下的触觉敏感度。通过相关分析确定了BrSA与静息时皮肤僵硬度和触觉敏感度之间的关系。通过双向方差分析评估了运动和测试部位的影响。乳晕边缘上方 3 厘米处(r = 0.61,P = 0.005)和乳晕上缘(r = 0.54,P = 0.016)的皮肤僵硬度与 BrSA 呈正相关,但与乳头下方无关(P > 0.05)。乳晕下方 3 厘米区域的硬度也明显高于所有其他测试点(P 0.09),但在乳房各处有所不同(即乳晕下方 3 厘米区域比乳晕下缘更敏感;P = 0.018)。运动后整个乳房的皮肤僵硬度和触觉敏感度下降了 ∼37% (P = 0.018)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of female breast surface area on skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and following exercise in the heat

The effect of female breast surface area on skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and following exercise in the heat

Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and after exercise in the heat remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity in 20 young to middle-aged women (27 ± 8 years of age) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147–502 cm2) at rest and after a submaximal run in a warm climatic chamber (32 C ${\mathrm{C}}$  ±  0 . 6 C ; ${\mathrm{0}}{\mathrm{.6C;}}$ 53% ± 1.7% relative humidity). Skin stiffness above and below the nipple and tactile sensitivity from the nipple down were measured. Associations between BrSA and both skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest were determined via correlation analyses. Effects of exercise and test site were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. Skin stiffness was positively correlated with BrSA 3 cm above the areola edge (r = 0.61, = 0.005) and at the superior areola border (r = 0.54, = 0.016), but not below the nipple (> 0.05). The area 3 cm below the areola was also significantly stiffer than all other test sites (< 0.043). Tactile sensitivity did not vary with BrSA (> 0.09), but it varied across the breast (i.e., the area 3 cm below the areola was more sensitive than the inferior areola edge; = 0.018). Skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity across the breast decreased after exercise by ∼37% (< 0.001) and ∼45% (= 0.008), respectively. These findings expand our fundamental understanding of the mechanosensory properties of the female breast, and they could help to inform sportswear innovation to better meet the support needs of women of different breast sizes at rest and following exercise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信