Hannah Blount, Alessandro Valenza, Jade Ward, Silvia Caggiari, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri
{"title":"女性乳房表面积对休息时和热身运动后皮肤僵硬度和触觉敏感度的影响。","authors":"Hannah Blount, Alessandro Valenza, Jade Ward, Silvia Caggiari, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri","doi":"10.1113/EP091990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and after exercise in the heat remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity in 20 young to middle-aged women (27 ± 8 years of age) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147–502 cm<sup>2</sup>) at rest and after a submaximal run in a warm climatic chamber (32<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <annotation>${\\mathrm{C}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> ± <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>0</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>.</mo>\n <mn>6</mn>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mo>;</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${\\mathrm{0}}{\\mathrm{.6C;}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 53% ± 1.7% relative humidity). Skin stiffness above and below the nipple and tactile sensitivity from the nipple down were measured. Associations between BrSA and both skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest were determined via correlation analyses. Effects of exercise and test site were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. Skin stiffness was positively correlated with BrSA 3 cm above the areola edge (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>P </i>= 0.005) and at the superior areola border (<i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>P </i>= 0.016), but not below the nipple (<i>P </i>> 0.05). The area 3 cm below the areola was also significantly stiffer than all other test sites (<i>P </i>< 0.043). Tactile sensitivity did not vary with BrSA (<i>P </i>> 0.09), but it varied across the breast (i.e., the area 3 cm below the areola was more sensitive than the inferior areola edge; <i>P </i>= 0.018). Skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity across the breast decreased after exercise by ∼37% (<i>P </i>< 0.001) and ∼45% (<i>P </i>= 0.008), respectively. These findings expand our fundamental understanding of the mechanosensory properties of the female breast, and they could help to inform sportswear innovation to better meet the support needs of women of different breast sizes at rest and following exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":"109 10","pages":"1698-1709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of female breast surface area on skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and following exercise in the heat\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Blount, Alessandro Valenza, Jade Ward, Silvia Caggiari, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP091990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and after exercise in the heat remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity in 20 young to middle-aged women (27 ± 8 years of age) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147–502 cm<sup>2</sup>) at rest and after a submaximal run in a warm climatic chamber (32<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <annotation>${\\\\mathrm{C}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> ± <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>.</mo>\\n <mn>6</mn>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mo>;</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>${\\\\mathrm{0}}{\\\\mathrm{.6C;}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 53% ± 1.7% relative humidity). Skin stiffness above and below the nipple and tactile sensitivity from the nipple down were measured. Associations between BrSA and both skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest were determined via correlation analyses. Effects of exercise and test site were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. Skin stiffness was positively correlated with BrSA 3 cm above the areola edge (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>P </i>= 0.005) and at the superior areola border (<i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>P </i>= 0.016), but not below the nipple (<i>P </i>> 0.05). The area 3 cm below the areola was also significantly stiffer than all other test sites (<i>P </i>< 0.043). Tactile sensitivity did not vary with BrSA (<i>P </i>> 0.09), but it varied across the breast (i.e., the area 3 cm below the areola was more sensitive than the inferior areola edge; <i>P </i>= 0.018). Skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity across the breast decreased after exercise by ∼37% (<i>P </i>< 0.001) and ∼45% (<i>P </i>= 0.008), respectively. These findings expand our fundamental understanding of the mechanosensory properties of the female breast, and they could help to inform sportswear innovation to better meet the support needs of women of different breast sizes at rest and following exercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\"109 10\",\"pages\":\"1698-1709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of female breast surface area on skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and following exercise in the heat
Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and after exercise in the heat remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity in 20 young to middle-aged women (27 ± 8 years of age) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147–502 cm2) at rest and after a submaximal run in a warm climatic chamber (32 ± 53% ± 1.7% relative humidity). Skin stiffness above and below the nipple and tactile sensitivity from the nipple down were measured. Associations between BrSA and both skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest were determined via correlation analyses. Effects of exercise and test site were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. Skin stiffness was positively correlated with BrSA 3 cm above the areola edge (r = 0.61, P = 0.005) and at the superior areola border (r = 0.54, P = 0.016), but not below the nipple (P > 0.05). The area 3 cm below the areola was also significantly stiffer than all other test sites (P < 0.043). Tactile sensitivity did not vary with BrSA (P > 0.09), but it varied across the breast (i.e., the area 3 cm below the areola was more sensitive than the inferior areola edge; P = 0.018). Skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity across the breast decreased after exercise by ∼37% (P < 0.001) and ∼45% (P = 0.008), respectively. These findings expand our fundamental understanding of the mechanosensory properties of the female breast, and they could help to inform sportswear innovation to better meet the support needs of women of different breast sizes at rest and following exercise.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.