平均血小板体积/血小板计数比和高血压患者的 "节食"/"不节食 "情况。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Serdar Gökhan Nurkoç, Turab Yakışan
{"title":"平均血小板体积/血小板计数比和高血压患者的 \"节食\"/\"不节食 \"情况。","authors":"Serdar Gökhan Nurkoç, Turab Yakışan","doi":"10.1177/00033197241274825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an interaction between mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet count (PC), inflammation, and platelet reactivity. The present study evaluated the relationship between the MPV/PC ratio and blood pressure (BP) using 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). A total of 720 patients (male: 291) were included in the study. Based on the ABPM outcomes, they were divided into two groups: dipper hypertensive (<i>n</i> = 350; male: 136) and non-dipper hypertensive (<i>n</i> = 370; male: 155). Peripheral venous blood samples obtained at admission were used for PC and MPV calculations. Both groups displayed identical clinical characteristics. Non-dipper hypertensives had a higher MPV/PC ratio than dipper hypertensives [0.044; (0.036-0.055); 0.036 (0.030-0.042); <i>P</i> < .001]. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of the MPV/PC ratio for predicting non-dipper patterns in hypertensive patients was 0.040 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.726, <i>P</i> < .001). Sensitivity was 64.1% and specificity was 64.3%. The MPV/PC ratio may represent mechanisms involved in increasing cardiovascular risk in non-dipper hypertensives compared with dipper hypertensives.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"33197241274825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mean Platelet Volume/Platelet Count Ratio and Dipper/Non-Dipper Hypertensive Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Serdar Gökhan Nurkoç, Turab Yakışan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00033197241274825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is an interaction between mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet count (PC), inflammation, and platelet reactivity. The present study evaluated the relationship between the MPV/PC ratio and blood pressure (BP) using 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). A total of 720 patients (male: 291) were included in the study. Based on the ABPM outcomes, they were divided into two groups: dipper hypertensive (<i>n</i> = 350; male: 136) and non-dipper hypertensive (<i>n</i> = 370; male: 155). Peripheral venous blood samples obtained at admission were used for PC and MPV calculations. Both groups displayed identical clinical characteristics. Non-dipper hypertensives had a higher MPV/PC ratio than dipper hypertensives [0.044; (0.036-0.055); 0.036 (0.030-0.042); <i>P</i> < .001]. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of the MPV/PC ratio for predicting non-dipper patterns in hypertensive patients was 0.040 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.726, <i>P</i> < .001). Sensitivity was 64.1% and specificity was 64.3%. The MPV/PC ratio may represent mechanisms involved in increasing cardiovascular risk in non-dipper hypertensives compared with dipper hypertensives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33197241274825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241274825\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241274825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

平均血小板体积(MPV)、血小板计数(PC)、炎症和血小板反应性之间存在相互作用。本研究使用 24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM)评估了 MPV/PC 比率与血压(BP)之间的关系。研究共纳入了 720 名患者(男性:291 人)。根据 ABPM 的结果,他们被分为两组:自饮型高血压(n = 350;男性:136)和非自饮型高血压(n = 370;男性:155)。入院时采集的外周静脉血样本用于计算 PC 和 MPV。两组患者的临床特征相同。非慎尿型高血压患者的 MPV/PC 比值高于慎尿型高血压患者 [0.044; (0.036-0.055); 0.036 (0.030-0.042); P < .001]。根据接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,预测高血压患者非脱落模式的 MPV/PC 比值的最佳临界值为 0.040(曲线下面积 [AUC]:0.726,P < .001)。灵敏度为 64.1%,特异度为 64.3%。MPV/PC 比值可能代表了非北斗高血压患者与北斗高血压患者相比增加心血管风险的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mean Platelet Volume/Platelet Count Ratio and Dipper/Non-Dipper Hypertensive Patients.

There is an interaction between mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet count (PC), inflammation, and platelet reactivity. The present study evaluated the relationship between the MPV/PC ratio and blood pressure (BP) using 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). A total of 720 patients (male: 291) were included in the study. Based on the ABPM outcomes, they were divided into two groups: dipper hypertensive (n = 350; male: 136) and non-dipper hypertensive (n = 370; male: 155). Peripheral venous blood samples obtained at admission were used for PC and MPV calculations. Both groups displayed identical clinical characteristics. Non-dipper hypertensives had a higher MPV/PC ratio than dipper hypertensives [0.044; (0.036-0.055); 0.036 (0.030-0.042); P < .001]. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of the MPV/PC ratio for predicting non-dipper patterns in hypertensive patients was 0.040 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.726, P < .001). Sensitivity was 64.1% and specificity was 64.3%. The MPV/PC ratio may represent mechanisms involved in increasing cardiovascular risk in non-dipper hypertensives compared with dipper hypertensives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信