利用英国全国学校研究中的二氧化碳数据评估教室通风率,并确定全校相关因素

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Samuel G.A. Wood, Alice E.E. Handy, Katherine Roberts, Henry C. Burridge
{"title":"利用英国全国学校研究中的二氧化碳数据评估教室通风率,并确定全校相关因素","authors":"Samuel G.A. Wood,&nbsp;Alice E.E. Handy,&nbsp;Katherine Roberts,&nbsp;Henry C. Burridge","doi":"10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Per-person ventilation rates were assessed from data measured in 322 UK schools throughout the Autumn term, 2023. It was found that the overall mean ventilation rate was 5.3 L s<sup>−1</sup> p<sup>−1</sup>; rising to 6.8 L s<sup>−1</sup> p<sup>−1</sup> during warmer weather and falling to 3.8 L s<sup>−1</sup> p<sup>−1</sup> during colder weather. Daily mean CO<sub>2</sub> levels recorded in the majority of schools consistently fell below the 1500 ppm threshold within government school ventilation guidance but the contribution of relatively few very high CO<sub>2</sub> levels in some classrooms shows the need for targeted improvement and highlights the value of large-scale datasets. Exceedance of the 1500 ppm threshold rose to approximately 20% when the daily mean outdoor temperature fell to around 5 °C, indicating a barrier to ventilation. Controlling for outdoor temperature as a covariate, analysis of the CO<sub>2</sub> measurements indicated schools in more-deprived regions, state-funded schools (relative to private), and secondary schools (relative to primary) exhibited statistically-significant higher CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Reassuringly, these findings remained unchanged when the analysis was deployed on estimated per-person ventilation rates; except that this enhanced analysis accounted for the greater CO<sub>2</sub> production associated with older children and demonstrated that ventilation rates were not significantly different between primary and secondary schools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34137,"journal":{"name":"Developments in the Built Environment","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100520"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165924002011/pdfft?md5=4c5cee527042db9b598243026112baf2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666165924002011-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing classroom ventilation rates using CO2 data from a nationwide study of UK schools and identifying school-wide correlation factors\",\"authors\":\"Samuel G.A. Wood,&nbsp;Alice E.E. Handy,&nbsp;Katherine Roberts,&nbsp;Henry C. Burridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Per-person ventilation rates were assessed from data measured in 322 UK schools throughout the Autumn term, 2023. It was found that the overall mean ventilation rate was 5.3 L s<sup>−1</sup> p<sup>−1</sup>; rising to 6.8 L s<sup>−1</sup> p<sup>−1</sup> during warmer weather and falling to 3.8 L s<sup>−1</sup> p<sup>−1</sup> during colder weather. Daily mean CO<sub>2</sub> levels recorded in the majority of schools consistently fell below the 1500 ppm threshold within government school ventilation guidance but the contribution of relatively few very high CO<sub>2</sub> levels in some classrooms shows the need for targeted improvement and highlights the value of large-scale datasets. Exceedance of the 1500 ppm threshold rose to approximately 20% when the daily mean outdoor temperature fell to around 5 °C, indicating a barrier to ventilation. Controlling for outdoor temperature as a covariate, analysis of the CO<sub>2</sub> measurements indicated schools in more-deprived regions, state-funded schools (relative to private), and secondary schools (relative to primary) exhibited statistically-significant higher CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Reassuringly, these findings remained unchanged when the analysis was deployed on estimated per-person ventilation rates; except that this enhanced analysis accounted for the greater CO<sub>2</sub> production associated with older children and demonstrated that ventilation rates were not significantly different between primary and secondary schools.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developments in the Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165924002011/pdfft?md5=4c5cee527042db9b598243026112baf2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666165924002011-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developments in the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165924002011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165924002011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 2023 年整个秋季学期在英国 322 所学校测量的数据,对每人的通风率进行了评估。结果发现,总体平均通风率为 5.3 升/秒-1 p-1;在天气较热时上升到 6.8 升/秒-1 p-1,在天气较冷时下降到 3.8 升/秒-1 p-1。大多数学校记录到的日平均二氧化碳浓度始终低于政府学校通风指南中规定的 1500 ppm 临界值,但一些教室中相对较少的极高二氧化碳浓度表明有必要进行有针对性的改进,并凸显了大规模数据集的价值。当室外日平均气温降至 5 °C左右时,超过 1500 ppm 临界值的比例上升到约 20%,这表明通风存在障碍。将室外温度作为协变量进行控制后,对二氧化碳测量结果的分析表明,贫困地区的学校、国家资助学校(相对于私立学校)和中学(相对于小学)的二氧化碳浓度在统计上明显更高。令人欣慰的是,在对估计的人均通风率进行分析时,这些结果仍保持不变;只是这种强化分析考虑到了年龄较大的儿童产生的更多二氧化碳,并表明通风率在小学和中学之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing classroom ventilation rates using CO2 data from a nationwide study of UK schools and identifying school-wide correlation factors

Per-person ventilation rates were assessed from data measured in 322 UK schools throughout the Autumn term, 2023. It was found that the overall mean ventilation rate was 5.3 L s−1 p−1; rising to 6.8 L s−1 p−1 during warmer weather and falling to 3.8 L s−1 p−1 during colder weather. Daily mean CO2 levels recorded in the majority of schools consistently fell below the 1500 ppm threshold within government school ventilation guidance but the contribution of relatively few very high CO2 levels in some classrooms shows the need for targeted improvement and highlights the value of large-scale datasets. Exceedance of the 1500 ppm threshold rose to approximately 20% when the daily mean outdoor temperature fell to around 5 °C, indicating a barrier to ventilation. Controlling for outdoor temperature as a covariate, analysis of the CO2 measurements indicated schools in more-deprived regions, state-funded schools (relative to private), and secondary schools (relative to primary) exhibited statistically-significant higher CO2 concentration. Reassuringly, these findings remained unchanged when the analysis was deployed on estimated per-person ventilation rates; except that this enhanced analysis accounted for the greater CO2 production associated with older children and demonstrated that ventilation rates were not significantly different between primary and secondary schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Developments in the Built Environment (DIBE) is a recently established peer-reviewed gold open access journal, ensuring that all accepted articles are permanently and freely accessible. Focused on civil engineering and the built environment, DIBE publishes original papers and short communications. Encompassing topics such as construction materials and building sustainability, the journal adopts a holistic approach with the aim of benefiting the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信