Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa , Allan Robson Kluser Sales , Juliana Góes Martins Fagundes , Luis Fábio Barbosa Botelho , Francis Ribeiro de Souza , Guilherme Wesley Fonseca , André Luis Pereira de Albuquerque , Marcelo Dantas Tavares de Melo , Maria-Janieire de Nazaré Nunes Alves
{"title":"评估 COVID-19 重型患者的心肌工作和运动能力","authors":"Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa , Allan Robson Kluser Sales , Juliana Góes Martins Fagundes , Luis Fábio Barbosa Botelho , Francis Ribeiro de Souza , Guilherme Wesley Fonseca , André Luis Pereira de Albuquerque , Marcelo Dantas Tavares de Melo , Maria-Janieire de Nazaré Nunes Alves","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The impact of COVID-19 goes beyond its acute form and can lead to the persistence of symptoms and the emergence of systemic disorders, defined as long-term COVID.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a cross-sectional study that included patients over 18 years of age who recovered from the severe form of COVID-19 at least 60 days after their discharge. Patients and controls were enrolled to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using a more sensitive tool, myocardial work, in combination with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 52 patients and 31 controls were enrolled. Significant differences were observed in ejection fraction (LVEF; 62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %; p = 0.007), global longitudinal strain (LVGLS; −18.7 ± 2.6 vs. −20.4 ± 1.4 %; p = 0.001), myocardial wasted work (GWW; 152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg; p = 0.003), and myocardial work efficiency (GWE; 93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %; p = 0.002). We found a significant difference in peak VO<sub>2</sub> (24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min; p < 0.001), heart rate (160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001), ventilation (84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min; p < 0.001), OUES% (89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %; p = 0.002), T ½ (120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s; p = 0.002) and HRR at 2 min (−36 ± 11 vs. −43 ± 13 bpm; p = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings revealed an increased wasted work, with lower myocardial efficiency, significantly reduced aerobic exercise capacity, and abnormal heart rate response during recovery, which may be related to previously described late symptoms. The reduction in functional capacity during physical exercise is partly associated with a decrease in resting myocardial work efficiency. These findings strongly indicate the need to determine whether these manifestations persist in the long term and their impact on cardiovascular health and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000898/pdfft?md5=b916ffbd5011e23ab681a09d6aba116a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000898-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of myocardial work and exercise capacity in patients recovered from the severe form of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa , Allan Robson Kluser Sales , Juliana Góes Martins Fagundes , Luis Fábio Barbosa Botelho , Francis Ribeiro de Souza , Guilherme Wesley Fonseca , André Luis Pereira de Albuquerque , Marcelo Dantas Tavares de Melo , Maria-Janieire de Nazaré Nunes Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The impact of COVID-19 goes beyond its acute form and can lead to the persistence of symptoms and the emergence of systemic disorders, defined as long-term COVID.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a cross-sectional study that included patients over 18 years of age who recovered from the severe form of COVID-19 at least 60 days after their discharge. Patients and controls were enrolled to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using a more sensitive tool, myocardial work, in combination with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 52 patients and 31 controls were enrolled. Significant differences were observed in ejection fraction (LVEF; 62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %; p = 0.007), global longitudinal strain (LVGLS; −18.7 ± 2.6 vs. −20.4 ± 1.4 %; p = 0.001), myocardial wasted work (GWW; 152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg; p = 0.003), and myocardial work efficiency (GWE; 93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %; p = 0.002). We found a significant difference in peak VO<sub>2</sub> (24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min; p < 0.001), heart rate (160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001), ventilation (84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min; p < 0.001), OUES% (89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %; p = 0.002), T ½ (120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s; p = 0.002) and HRR at 2 min (−36 ± 11 vs. −43 ± 13 bpm; p = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings revealed an increased wasted work, with lower myocardial efficiency, significantly reduced aerobic exercise capacity, and abnormal heart rate response during recovery, which may be related to previously described late symptoms. The reduction in functional capacity during physical exercise is partly associated with a decrease in resting myocardial work efficiency. These findings strongly indicate the need to determine whether these manifestations persist in the long term and their impact on cardiovascular health and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000898/pdfft?md5=b916ffbd5011e23ab681a09d6aba116a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000898-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景COVID-19的影响超出了其急性形式,可导致症状持续存在并出现全身性疾病,即长期COVID.方法我们进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了出院后至少60天从严重COVID-19中康复的18岁以上患者。患者和对照组均接受了经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查,并结合心肺运动测试(CPET)使用了一种更敏感的工具--心肌功。在射血分数(LVEF;62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %;p = 0.007)、整体纵向应变(LVGLS;-18.7 ± 2.6 vs. -20.4 ± 1.4 %;p = 0.001)、心肌耗功(GWW;152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg;p = 0.003)和心肌工作效率(GWE;93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %;p = 0.002)方面观察到显著差异。我们发现在峰值 VO2(24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min;p < 0.001)、心率(160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm;p < 0.001)、通气量(84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min;p <;0.001)、OUES%(89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %;p = 0.002)、T ½(120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s;p = 0.结论我们的研究结果表明,心肌效率降低,有氧运动能力显著下降,恢复期心率反应异常,这些可能与之前描述的晚期症状有关。体育锻炼时功能能力的降低部分与静息心肌工作效率的降低有关。这些发现有力地表明,有必要确定这些表现是否会长期存在,以及它们对 COVID-19 幸存者的心血管健康和生活质量的影响。
Evaluation of myocardial work and exercise capacity in patients recovered from the severe form of COVID-19
Background
The impact of COVID-19 goes beyond its acute form and can lead to the persistence of symptoms and the emergence of systemic disorders, defined as long-term COVID.
Methods
We performed a cross-sectional study that included patients over 18 years of age who recovered from the severe form of COVID-19 at least 60 days after their discharge. Patients and controls were enrolled to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using a more sensitive tool, myocardial work, in combination with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).
Results
A total of 52 patients and 31 controls were enrolled. Significant differences were observed in ejection fraction (LVEF; 62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %; p = 0.007), global longitudinal strain (LVGLS; −18.7 ± 2.6 vs. −20.4 ± 1.4 %; p = 0.001), myocardial wasted work (GWW; 152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg; p = 0.003), and myocardial work efficiency (GWE; 93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %; p = 0.002). We found a significant difference in peak VO2 (24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min; p < 0.001), heart rate (160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001), ventilation (84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min; p < 0.001), OUES% (89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %; p = 0.002), T ½ (120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s; p = 0.002) and HRR at 2 min (−36 ± 11 vs. −43 ± 13 bpm; p = 0.010).
Conclusion
Our findings revealed an increased wasted work, with lower myocardial efficiency, significantly reduced aerobic exercise capacity, and abnormal heart rate response during recovery, which may be related to previously described late symptoms. The reduction in functional capacity during physical exercise is partly associated with a decrease in resting myocardial work efficiency. These findings strongly indicate the need to determine whether these manifestations persist in the long term and their impact on cardiovascular health and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors.