使用植牙疾病风险评估图评估长期功能性植牙的边缘骨水平变化:2至6年随访回顾性研究。

Batuhan Asik, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Busra Terzioglu, Seyma Eken
{"title":"使用植牙疾病风险评估图评估长期功能性植牙的边缘骨水平变化:2至6年随访回顾性研究。","authors":"Batuhan Asik, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Busra Terzioglu, Seyma Eken","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between risk profile assessments of dental implants that have been in function for at least 2 years and peri-implant marginal bone loss during the follow-up period using the Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA) diagram.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 70 patients, with 170 implants that had been functionally loaded for at least 2 years, had to attend follow-up sessions to be included in the study. Full-mouth plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. Other parameters were also recorded, including peri implant modified plaque index, modified bleeding index, keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and gingival recession (GR). According to the IDRA risk diagram, participants and dental implants were divided into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups. Marginal bone level (MBL) was measured on periapical radiographs obtained at functional loading (T0) and at the last follow-up session (T1), and mesial and distal marginal bone level changes (ΔMBL) were calculated as T1-T0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant correlation was found between the periodontitis history and periodontitis susceptibility regarding IDRA classification at the patient level. Full-mouth GI, PD, and BoP were found to be statistically higher in the high-risk IDRA group. No statistically significant results were found between the mesial and distal ΔMBL of the IDRA risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IDRA risk level increased especially by periodontitis susceptibility and periodontitis history, but no significant difference was found between risk groups in terms of ΔMBL.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":" ","pages":"218-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marginal Bone Level Changes and Evaluation of Long-Term Functional Dental Implants with the Implant Disease Risk Assessment Diagram: A 2- to 6-Year Follow-up Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Batuhan Asik, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Busra Terzioglu, Seyma Eken\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.10956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between risk profile assessments of dental implants that have been in function for at least 2 years and peri-implant marginal bone loss during the follow-up period using the Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA) diagram.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 70 patients, with 170 implants that had been functionally loaded for at least 2 years, had to attend follow-up sessions to be included in the study. Full-mouth plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. Other parameters were also recorded, including peri implant modified plaque index, modified bleeding index, keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and gingival recession (GR). According to the IDRA risk diagram, participants and dental implants were divided into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups. Marginal bone level (MBL) was measured on periapical radiographs obtained at functional loading (T0) and at the last follow-up session (T1), and mesial and distal marginal bone level changes (ΔMBL) were calculated as T1-T0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant correlation was found between the periodontitis history and periodontitis susceptibility regarding IDRA classification at the patient level. Full-mouth GI, PD, and BoP were found to be statistically higher in the high-risk IDRA group. No statistically significant results were found between the mesial and distal ΔMBL of the IDRA risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IDRA risk level increased especially by periodontitis susceptibility and periodontitis history, but no significant difference was found between risk groups in terms of ΔMBL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在使用 "种植体疾病风险评估图 "评估至少已使用两年的种植体的风险评估与随访期间种植体周围边缘骨质流失之间的关系。材料和方法:本研究共纳入了 70 名患者和 170 个种植体,这些患者和种植体至少已功能装载两年,并参加了随访。记录全口牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血量、临床附着水平(CAL)以及种植体周围改良牙菌斑指数、改良出血指数、PD、角化粘膜宽度(KMW)、CAL和GR。根据 IDRA 风险图,参与者和牙种植体被分为低、中、高风险组。在功能负荷时(T0)和最后一次随访时(T1)拍摄的根尖周X光片上测量边缘骨水平(MBL),计算T1-T0的中远端边缘骨水平变化(ΔMBL)。结果:牙周炎病史和牙周炎易感性与 IDRA 分级在患者层面上有统计学意义的相关性。全口 GI、PD 和 BOP 在高风险 IDRA 组中具有统计学意义的较高水平。IDRA风险组之间的中轴和远轴ΔMBL没有统计学意义:结论:在这项研究中,IDRA 风险水平会随着牙周炎易感性和牙周炎病史的增加而增加,但不同风险组之间的ΔMBL 没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marginal Bone Level Changes and Evaluation of Long-Term Functional Dental Implants with the Implant Disease Risk Assessment Diagram: A 2- to 6-Year Follow-up Retrospective Study.

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between risk profile assessments of dental implants that have been in function for at least 2 years and peri-implant marginal bone loss during the follow-up period using the Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA) diagram.

Materials and methods: A total of 70 patients, with 170 implants that had been functionally loaded for at least 2 years, had to attend follow-up sessions to be included in the study. Full-mouth plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. Other parameters were also recorded, including peri implant modified plaque index, modified bleeding index, keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and gingival recession (GR). According to the IDRA risk diagram, participants and dental implants were divided into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups. Marginal bone level (MBL) was measured on periapical radiographs obtained at functional loading (T0) and at the last follow-up session (T1), and mesial and distal marginal bone level changes (ΔMBL) were calculated as T1-T0.

Results: A statistically significant correlation was found between the periodontitis history and periodontitis susceptibility regarding IDRA classification at the patient level. Full-mouth GI, PD, and BoP were found to be statistically higher in the high-risk IDRA group. No statistically significant results were found between the mesial and distal ΔMBL of the IDRA risk groups.

Conclusions: The IDRA risk level increased especially by periodontitis susceptibility and periodontitis history, but no significant difference was found between risk groups in terms of ΔMBL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信