切割女性生殖器与尿失禁:与苏丹人口流行情况的分析比较。

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) Pub Date : 2024-08-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20231663
Mustafa Cengiz Dura, Hilal Aktürk, Salih Mahmoud Abaker Salih, Özgür Aslan, Metehan Hergüner, Murat Ekin
{"title":"切割女性生殖器与尿失禁:与苏丹人口流行情况的分析比较。","authors":"Mustafa Cengiz Dura, Hilal Aktürk, Salih Mahmoud Abaker Salih, Özgür Aslan, Metehan Hergüner, Murat Ekin","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20231663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Female genital mutilation/cutting impacts over 200 million women globally and is linked to obstetric complications as well as long-term urogynecological and psychosexual issues that are frequently overlooked and inadequately addressed. This study aimed to assess the impact of female genital mutilation/cutting on urinary incontinence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in the gynecology department of the Research Hospital located in the Nyala rural region of Sudan. The participants were interviewed to gather socio-demographic and background information. In addition, they received a thorough gynecological examination to evaluate the presence and type of female genital mutilation/cutting. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory were applied to the group with female genital mutilation/cutting and the control group without female genital mutilation/cutting to evaluate urinary incontinence and related discomfort. Subsequently, the scores of both participant groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study compared age, weight, height, BMI, gravida, parity, and sexual intercourse averages between groups. The mean Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores of individuals who underwent mutilation were higher than those of individuals who did not undergo mutilation (p<0.001). Notably, participants subjected to infibulation exhibited significantly higher average scores on both measures in contrast with the other groups (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher proportion of mutilated participants, specifically those with infibulation, are afflicted with symptoms of incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94194,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female genital mutilation and urinary incontinence: an analytical comparison with Sudan's prevalent demography.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Cengiz Dura, Hilal Aktürk, Salih Mahmoud Abaker Salih, Özgür Aslan, Metehan Hergüner, Murat Ekin\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9282.20231663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Female genital mutilation/cutting impacts over 200 million women globally and is linked to obstetric complications as well as long-term urogynecological and psychosexual issues that are frequently overlooked and inadequately addressed. This study aimed to assess the impact of female genital mutilation/cutting on urinary incontinence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in the gynecology department of the Research Hospital located in the Nyala rural region of Sudan. The participants were interviewed to gather socio-demographic and background information. In addition, they received a thorough gynecological examination to evaluate the presence and type of female genital mutilation/cutting. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory were applied to the group with female genital mutilation/cutting and the control group without female genital mutilation/cutting to evaluate urinary incontinence and related discomfort. Subsequently, the scores of both participant groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study compared age, weight, height, BMI, gravida, parity, and sexual intercourse averages between groups. The mean Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores of individuals who underwent mutilation were higher than those of individuals who did not undergo mutilation (p<0.001). Notably, participants subjected to infibulation exhibited significantly higher average scores on both measures in contrast with the other groups (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher proportion of mutilated participants, specifically those with infibulation, are afflicted with symptoms of incontinence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20231663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20231663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:残割/切割女性生殖器对全球 2 亿多妇女造成了影响,并与产科并发症以及长期的泌尿妇科和性心理问题有关,而这些问题经常被忽视,也未得到充分解决。本研究旨在评估切割女性生殖器对尿失禁的影响:这项横断面研究在苏丹尼亚拉农村地区研究医院的妇科进行。对参与者进行了访谈,以收集社会人口和背景信息。此外,她们还接受了彻底的妇科检查,以评估是否存在切割女性生殖器的情况和类型。残割/切割女性生殖器组和未残割/切割女性生殖器的对照组分别采用尿失禁影响问卷和尿道压力量表来评估尿失禁和相关不适。随后,比较了两组参与者的得分:研究比较了两组受试者的年龄、体重、身高、体重指数、孕产妇数、奇偶数和性交平均数。接受残割者的尿道窘迫量表-6 和尿失禁影响问卷-7 的平均得分高于未接受残割者(p):更高比例的残割参与者,尤其是阴部扣锁者,会出现尿失禁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Female genital mutilation and urinary incontinence: an analytical comparison with Sudan's prevalent demography.

Objective: Female genital mutilation/cutting impacts over 200 million women globally and is linked to obstetric complications as well as long-term urogynecological and psychosexual issues that are frequently overlooked and inadequately addressed. This study aimed to assess the impact of female genital mutilation/cutting on urinary incontinence.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the gynecology department of the Research Hospital located in the Nyala rural region of Sudan. The participants were interviewed to gather socio-demographic and background information. In addition, they received a thorough gynecological examination to evaluate the presence and type of female genital mutilation/cutting. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory were applied to the group with female genital mutilation/cutting and the control group without female genital mutilation/cutting to evaluate urinary incontinence and related discomfort. Subsequently, the scores of both participant groups were compared.

Results: The study compared age, weight, height, BMI, gravida, parity, and sexual intercourse averages between groups. The mean Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores of individuals who underwent mutilation were higher than those of individuals who did not undergo mutilation (p<0.001). Notably, participants subjected to infibulation exhibited significantly higher average scores on both measures in contrast with the other groups (p<0.001).

Conclusion: A higher proportion of mutilated participants, specifically those with infibulation, are afflicted with symptoms of incontinence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信