脊髓损伤患者短期使用脊髓刺激时的功能结果和参与者的观点。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daniel D Veith, Megan L Gill, Lisa A Beck, Crystal L Whitmarsh, K A Fernandez, Margaux B Linde, Anders J Asp, Candee J Mills, Mark A Bendel, Peter J Grahn, Kristin D Zhao
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者短期使用脊髓刺激时的功能结果和参与者的观点。","authors":"Daniel D Veith, Megan L Gill, Lisa A Beck, Crystal L Whitmarsh, K A Fernandez, Margaux B Linde, Anders J Asp, Candee J Mills, Mark A Bendel, Peter J Grahn, Kristin D Zhao","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2383377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to quantify changes in performance of task-specific motor activities over 12 motor rehabilitation sessions with lumbosacral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) via either transcutaneous stimulation or epidural stimulation. Both stimulation modalities have been used in recent years to restore functions lost to spinal cord injury (SCI). Secondary outcomes examine participants' perspectives captured via the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) upon study completion to further understand their perception of SCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six individuals with SCI completed 12 sessions with one modality of SCS during supine and/or side-lying, seated forward reaching, and standing activities. Changes in volitional lower extremity movement, the number of points of contact needed at hips and/or knees to facilitate standing, and changes in seated forward reaching distance were used to quantify performance. The UEQ was administered to gauge participants' perspectives following use of SCS to enable functions impaired due to SCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all participants, performance of motor activities improved with SCS compared to without stimulation. Responses for the UEQ showed an overall positive perception of trialing SCS with rehabilitation to enhance motor functions impaired by SCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of injury severity, location of injury, time since SCI, or SCS modality, all participants experienced gains in motor function in the presence of SCS combined with a condensed rehabilitation program. However, no evidence of sustained motor functions was found in the absence of SCS. UEQ results highlight the positive perception of SCS with rehabilitation as well as the importance of consulting persons with lived experience of SCS during clinical trial design and protocol development.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05095454.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional outcomes and participants' perspectives during short-term application of spinal stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel D Veith, Megan L Gill, Lisa A Beck, Crystal L Whitmarsh, K A Fernandez, Margaux B Linde, Anders J Asp, Candee J Mills, Mark A Bendel, Peter J Grahn, Kristin D Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2383377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to quantify changes in performance of task-specific motor activities over 12 motor rehabilitation sessions with lumbosacral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) via either transcutaneous stimulation or epidural stimulation. Both stimulation modalities have been used in recent years to restore functions lost to spinal cord injury (SCI). Secondary outcomes examine participants' perspectives captured via the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) upon study completion to further understand their perception of SCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six individuals with SCI completed 12 sessions with one modality of SCS during supine and/or side-lying, seated forward reaching, and standing activities. Changes in volitional lower extremity movement, the number of points of contact needed at hips and/or knees to facilitate standing, and changes in seated forward reaching distance were used to quantify performance. The UEQ was administered to gauge participants' perspectives following use of SCS to enable functions impaired due to SCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all participants, performance of motor activities improved with SCS compared to without stimulation. Responses for the UEQ showed an overall positive perception of trialing SCS with rehabilitation to enhance motor functions impaired by SCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of injury severity, location of injury, time since SCI, or SCS modality, all participants experienced gains in motor function in the presence of SCS combined with a condensed rehabilitation program. However, no evidence of sustained motor functions was found in the absence of SCS. UEQ results highlight the positive perception of SCS with rehabilitation as well as the importance of consulting persons with lived experience of SCS during clinical trial design and protocol development.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05095454.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2383377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2383377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的主要目的是通过经皮刺激或硬膜外刺激对腰骶部脊髓进行刺激(SCS),在 12 个运动康复疗程中量化特定任务运动能力的变化。近年来,这两种刺激模式都被用于恢复因脊髓损伤(SCI)而丧失的功能。次要结果是在研究完成后通过用户体验问卷(UEQ)了解参与者的观点,以进一步了解他们对 SCS 的看法:六名 SCI 患者在仰卧和/或侧卧、坐位前伸和站立活动中使用一种 SCS 模式完成了 12 次治疗。下肢自主运动的变化、髋部和/或膝部为促进站立所需的接触点数量以及坐位前伸距离的变化被用于量化表现。此外,还进行了 UEQ 测试,以了解参与者在使用 SCS 使因 SCI 而受损的功能得以恢复后的看法:结果:对所有参与者而言,使用 SCS 后的运动表现均比未使用刺激时有所改善。UEQ问卷调查结果显示,参与者对使用SCS进行康复训练以增强因SCI受损的运动功能的看法总体上是积极的:无论受伤严重程度、受伤部位、自 SCI 后的时间或 SCS 模式如何,所有参与者在使用 SCS 并结合简易康复计划的情况下,运动功能都有所改善。但是,在没有使用 SCS 的情况下,没有发现运动功能持续增强的证据。UEQ 的结果凸显了 SCS 与康复相结合的积极意义,以及在临床试验设计和方案制定过程中咨询有 SCS 生活经验者的重要性:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT05095454.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional outcomes and participants' perspectives during short-term application of spinal stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to quantify changes in performance of task-specific motor activities over 12 motor rehabilitation sessions with lumbosacral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) via either transcutaneous stimulation or epidural stimulation. Both stimulation modalities have been used in recent years to restore functions lost to spinal cord injury (SCI). Secondary outcomes examine participants' perspectives captured via the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) upon study completion to further understand their perception of SCS.

Methods: Six individuals with SCI completed 12 sessions with one modality of SCS during supine and/or side-lying, seated forward reaching, and standing activities. Changes in volitional lower extremity movement, the number of points of contact needed at hips and/or knees to facilitate standing, and changes in seated forward reaching distance were used to quantify performance. The UEQ was administered to gauge participants' perspectives following use of SCS to enable functions impaired due to SCI.

Results: For all participants, performance of motor activities improved with SCS compared to without stimulation. Responses for the UEQ showed an overall positive perception of trialing SCS with rehabilitation to enhance motor functions impaired by SCI.

Conclusions: Regardless of injury severity, location of injury, time since SCI, or SCS modality, all participants experienced gains in motor function in the presence of SCS combined with a condensed rehabilitation program. However, no evidence of sustained motor functions was found in the absence of SCS. UEQ results highlight the positive perception of SCS with rehabilitation as well as the importance of consulting persons with lived experience of SCS during clinical trial design and protocol development.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05095454.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信