可成型玻璃纤维背板装置是一种减轻慢性足底溃疡负担的新方法:回顾性观察审计。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Melissa Ting, Ivana Ferreira, Jonathan Hiew, Mahalia McEvoy, Gabrielle Tan, Priyal Shah, Eugenie Nicolandis, Emma J Hamilton, Jens Carsten Ritter, Michael Nicolaou, Laurens Manning
{"title":"可成型玻璃纤维背板装置是一种减轻慢性足底溃疡负担的新方法:回顾性观察审计。","authors":"Melissa Ting, Ivana Ferreira, Jonathan Hiew, Mahalia McEvoy, Gabrielle Tan, Priyal Shah, Eugenie Nicolandis, Emma J Hamilton, Jens Carsten Ritter, Michael Nicolaou, Laurens Manning","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure offloading is a critical component of plantar foot ulcer management, including diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU). Conventional offloading options such as total contact casting and removable knee-high walkers may be unsuitable or unsuccessful in patients with morbid obesity, intermittent lower limb oedema, high exudative wounds or poor mobility. A mouldable fibreglass backslab device (BSD) may be a practical alternative to be considered in these situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected on 28 patients (29 foot ulcers) with non-healing ulcers who received a BSD to offload their foot ulcer as an extension to standard offloading care. Baseline data included: patient demographics, type of offloading prior to BSD application, date of ulcer onset, days ulcer present prior to BSD application and ulcer size at BSD initiation. Measures of success included ulcer size reduction 12 weeks post-BSD application, time to complete ulcer healing in BSD, time to 50% reduction in ulcer size post-BSD application and total number of days ulcer present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (IQR) ulcer area and ulcer duration at baseline for 19 patients (20 ulcers) who used the BSD was 1.65 (0.4-3.8) cm<sup>2</sup> and 531 (101-635) days. At 12 weeks, the median (IQR) ulcer area was 0.3 (0-0.55) cm<sup>2</sup> with a median (IQR) reduction of 97 (80-100) %. Nine (45%) ulcers achieved complete wound healing (100% reduction in wound size) at 12 weeks post-BSD application, and the remaining 11 (55%) ulcers achieved at least 50% reduction in wound size. The median (IQR) time to complete wound healing and 50% reduction in wound size was 71 (35-134) days and 24 (15-44) days, respectively. Nine patients ceased use of the BSD and reverted to conventional offloading before their wounds had healed. Of these, four patients achieved a 50% reduction in wound size at the 12-week mark with conventional offloading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data suggests that a mouldable fibreglass BSD may be a practical offloading option in the management of DFUs, especially when conventional offloading methods are unsuccessful, unsuitable or unacceptable to patients. Higher level evidence is required to demonstrate suitability or efficacy of the BSD compared to current evidence-based recommended offloading methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"e70001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mouldable fibreglass backslab device as a novel approach to offload chronic plantar foot ulcers: A retrospective observational audit.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Ting, Ivana Ferreira, Jonathan Hiew, Mahalia McEvoy, Gabrielle Tan, Priyal Shah, Eugenie Nicolandis, Emma J Hamilton, Jens Carsten Ritter, Michael Nicolaou, Laurens Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure offloading is a critical component of plantar foot ulcer management, including diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU). Conventional offloading options such as total contact casting and removable knee-high walkers may be unsuitable or unsuccessful in patients with morbid obesity, intermittent lower limb oedema, high exudative wounds or poor mobility. A mouldable fibreglass backslab device (BSD) may be a practical alternative to be considered in these situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected on 28 patients (29 foot ulcers) with non-healing ulcers who received a BSD to offload their foot ulcer as an extension to standard offloading care. Baseline data included: patient demographics, type of offloading prior to BSD application, date of ulcer onset, days ulcer present prior to BSD application and ulcer size at BSD initiation. Measures of success included ulcer size reduction 12 weeks post-BSD application, time to complete ulcer healing in BSD, time to 50% reduction in ulcer size post-BSD application and total number of days ulcer present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (IQR) ulcer area and ulcer duration at baseline for 19 patients (20 ulcers) who used the BSD was 1.65 (0.4-3.8) cm<sup>2</sup> and 531 (101-635) days. At 12 weeks, the median (IQR) ulcer area was 0.3 (0-0.55) cm<sup>2</sup> with a median (IQR) reduction of 97 (80-100) %. Nine (45%) ulcers achieved complete wound healing (100% reduction in wound size) at 12 weeks post-BSD application, and the remaining 11 (55%) ulcers achieved at least 50% reduction in wound size. The median (IQR) time to complete wound healing and 50% reduction in wound size was 71 (35-134) days and 24 (15-44) days, respectively. Nine patients ceased use of the BSD and reverted to conventional offloading before their wounds had healed. Of these, four patients achieved a 50% reduction in wound size at the 12-week mark with conventional offloading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data suggests that a mouldable fibreglass BSD may be a practical offloading option in the management of DFUs, especially when conventional offloading methods are unsuccessful, unsuitable or unacceptable to patients. Higher level evidence is required to demonstrate suitability or efficacy of the BSD compared to current evidence-based recommended offloading methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"e70001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:压力卸载是足底溃疡(包括糖尿病相关足部溃疡 (DFU))治疗的重要组成部分。对于病态肥胖、间歇性下肢水肿、高渗出伤口或行动不便的患者来说,传统的卸压方法,如全接触铸造和可移动膝高助行器可能不适合或不成功。在这些情况下,可成型玻璃纤维背板装置(BSD)可能是一种实用的替代方案:我们回顾性地收集了 28 名溃疡未愈合患者(29 例足部溃疡)的数据,这些患者在接受标准卸载护理的基础上,使用 BSD 对足部溃疡进行卸载。基线数据包括:患者人口统计学特征、使用 BSD 前的卸载类型、溃疡发生日期、使用 BSD 前溃疡存在天数以及使用 BSD 时的溃疡面积。衡量成功与否的标准包括:使用 BSD 12 周后溃疡面积缩小情况、BSD 使溃疡完全愈合的时间、使用 BSD 后溃疡面积缩小 50% 的时间以及溃疡存在的总天数:使用 BSD 的 19 名患者(20 个溃疡)基线溃疡面积和溃疡持续时间的中位数(IQR)分别为 1.65 (0.4-3.8) 平方厘米和 531 (101-635) 天。12 周时,溃疡面积的中位数(IQR)为 0.3 (0-0.55) 平方厘米,中位数(IQR)为 97 (80-100) %。应用 BSD 后 12 周,9 个(45%)溃疡的伤口完全愈合(伤口面积缩小 100%),其余 11 个(55%)溃疡的伤口面积缩小至少 50%。伤口完全愈合和伤口面积缩小 50%的中位(IQR)时间分别为 71 (35-134) 天和 24 (15-44) 天。九名患者在伤口愈合前停止使用 BSD 并恢复了传统的负重疗法。其中,有四名患者在使用传统负重法 12 周时,伤口面积缩小了 50%:我们的初步数据表明,在治疗 DFU 时,可成型玻璃纤维 BSD 可能是一种实用的负重选择,尤其是在传统负重方法不成功、不适合或患者无法接受的情况下。与目前基于证据推荐的卸载方法相比,还需要更高级别的证据来证明 BSD 的适用性或有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mouldable fibreglass backslab device as a novel approach to offload chronic plantar foot ulcers: A retrospective observational audit.

Background: Pressure offloading is a critical component of plantar foot ulcer management, including diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU). Conventional offloading options such as total contact casting and removable knee-high walkers may be unsuitable or unsuccessful in patients with morbid obesity, intermittent lower limb oedema, high exudative wounds or poor mobility. A mouldable fibreglass backslab device (BSD) may be a practical alternative to be considered in these situations.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on 28 patients (29 foot ulcers) with non-healing ulcers who received a BSD to offload their foot ulcer as an extension to standard offloading care. Baseline data included: patient demographics, type of offloading prior to BSD application, date of ulcer onset, days ulcer present prior to BSD application and ulcer size at BSD initiation. Measures of success included ulcer size reduction 12 weeks post-BSD application, time to complete ulcer healing in BSD, time to 50% reduction in ulcer size post-BSD application and total number of days ulcer present.

Results: The median (IQR) ulcer area and ulcer duration at baseline for 19 patients (20 ulcers) who used the BSD was 1.65 (0.4-3.8) cm2 and 531 (101-635) days. At 12 weeks, the median (IQR) ulcer area was 0.3 (0-0.55) cm2 with a median (IQR) reduction of 97 (80-100) %. Nine (45%) ulcers achieved complete wound healing (100% reduction in wound size) at 12 weeks post-BSD application, and the remaining 11 (55%) ulcers achieved at least 50% reduction in wound size. The median (IQR) time to complete wound healing and 50% reduction in wound size was 71 (35-134) days and 24 (15-44) days, respectively. Nine patients ceased use of the BSD and reverted to conventional offloading before their wounds had healed. Of these, four patients achieved a 50% reduction in wound size at the 12-week mark with conventional offloading.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggests that a mouldable fibreglass BSD may be a practical offloading option in the management of DFUs, especially when conventional offloading methods are unsuccessful, unsuitable or unacceptable to patients. Higher level evidence is required to demonstrate suitability or efficacy of the BSD compared to current evidence-based recommended offloading methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信