[腰椎间盘突出症复发的手术治疗取决于风险因素]。

Q4 Medicine
V A Chekhonatsky, A V Kuznetsov, D Yu Usachev, N B Zakharova, A A Chekhonatsky, A V Gorozhanin, O N Dreval
{"title":"[腰椎间盘突出症复发的手术治疗取决于风险因素]。","authors":"V A Chekhonatsky, A V Kuznetsov, D Yu Usachev, N B Zakharova, A A Chekhonatsky, A V Gorozhanin, O N Dreval","doi":"10.17116/neiro20248804131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the literature, recurrent disc herniation of the lumbar spine occurs in 5-10% of cases. Objective. To develop an algorithm for surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar spine disc herniation based on analysis of risk factors of relapse and assessment of intra- and postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 61 patients with recurrent intervertebral disc herniation. Thirty patients underwent repeated microdiscectomy without transpedicular fixation, 31 patients - resection of recurrent disc herniation with transpedicular fixation (PLIF technique). The control group included 63 patients without recurrent disc herniation. Mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discectomy with transpedicular fixation is characterized by larger extent, prolonged surgery time and rehabilitation period. However, there is lower risk of recurrent disc herniation and CSF leakage. Repeated microdisectomy without transpedicular fixation is characterized by smaller extent and shorter surgery time, as well as faster recovery period. Nevertheless, we have higher risk of recurrent disc herniation and CSF leakage. We developed a method for assessing the probability of recurrent intervertebral disc herniation. This algorithm allows us to predict the probability of recurrent disc herniation in a particular patient with 86.7% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We proposed an algorithm for choosing surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation. Microdiscectomy without fixation is advisable for the risk of recurrent disc herniation <30%, discectomy with transpedicular fixation - for risk of disc herniation >30%.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Surgical treatment of recurrent herniated discs of the lumbar spine depending on risk factors].\",\"authors\":\"V A Chekhonatsky, A V Kuznetsov, D Yu Usachev, N B Zakharova, A A Chekhonatsky, A V Gorozhanin, O N Dreval\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/neiro20248804131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>According to the literature, recurrent disc herniation of the lumbar spine occurs in 5-10% of cases. Objective. To develop an algorithm for surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar spine disc herniation based on analysis of risk factors of relapse and assessment of intra- and postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 61 patients with recurrent intervertebral disc herniation. Thirty patients underwent repeated microdiscectomy without transpedicular fixation, 31 patients - resection of recurrent disc herniation with transpedicular fixation (PLIF technique). The control group included 63 patients without recurrent disc herniation. Mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discectomy with transpedicular fixation is characterized by larger extent, prolonged surgery time and rehabilitation period. However, there is lower risk of recurrent disc herniation and CSF leakage. Repeated microdisectomy without transpedicular fixation is characterized by smaller extent and shorter surgery time, as well as faster recovery period. Nevertheless, we have higher risk of recurrent disc herniation and CSF leakage. We developed a method for assessing the probability of recurrent intervertebral disc herniation. This algorithm allows us to predict the probability of recurrent disc herniation in a particular patient with 86.7% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We proposed an algorithm for choosing surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation. Microdiscectomy without fixation is advisable for the risk of recurrent disc herniation <30%, discectomy with transpedicular fixation - for risk of disc herniation >30%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248804131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248804131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献显示,腰椎间盘突出症复发率为 5-10%。研究目的根据对复发风险因素的分析以及术中和术后评估,制定手术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的算法:研究对象包括61名复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者。研究对象:61 名复发性椎间盘突出症患者,其中 30 名患者接受了重复显微椎间盘切除术,但未进行经椎固定;31 名患者接受了复发性椎间盘突出症切除术,并进行了经椎固定(PLIF 技术)。对照组包括 63 名无复发性椎间盘突出症的患者。平均随访时间为 3.5 年:结果:经椎间孔固定椎间盘切除术的特点是范围更大、手术时间和康复时间更长。然而,椎间盘突出症复发和 CSF 渗漏的风险较低。无经椎弓根固定的重复显微椎间盘切除术的特点是范围较小,手术时间较短,康复期较快。然而,椎间盘突出症复发和 CSF 渗漏的风险较高。我们开发了一种评估椎间盘突出复发概率的方法。通过这种算法,我们可以预测特定患者椎间盘突出症复发的概率,准确率高达 86.7%:我们提出了一种选择手术治疗复发性椎间盘突出症的算法。结论:我们提出了一种选择椎间盘突出症复发手术治疗的算法,对于椎间盘突出症复发风险为 30% 的患者,建议采用不固定的显微椎间盘切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Surgical treatment of recurrent herniated discs of the lumbar spine depending on risk factors].

According to the literature, recurrent disc herniation of the lumbar spine occurs in 5-10% of cases. Objective. To develop an algorithm for surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar spine disc herniation based on analysis of risk factors of relapse and assessment of intra- and postoperative period.

Material and methods: The study included 61 patients with recurrent intervertebral disc herniation. Thirty patients underwent repeated microdiscectomy without transpedicular fixation, 31 patients - resection of recurrent disc herniation with transpedicular fixation (PLIF technique). The control group included 63 patients without recurrent disc herniation. Mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.

Results: Discectomy with transpedicular fixation is characterized by larger extent, prolonged surgery time and rehabilitation period. However, there is lower risk of recurrent disc herniation and CSF leakage. Repeated microdisectomy without transpedicular fixation is characterized by smaller extent and shorter surgery time, as well as faster recovery period. Nevertheless, we have higher risk of recurrent disc herniation and CSF leakage. We developed a method for assessing the probability of recurrent intervertebral disc herniation. This algorithm allows us to predict the probability of recurrent disc herniation in a particular patient with 86.7% accuracy.

Conclusion: We proposed an algorithm for choosing surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation. Microdiscectomy without fixation is advisable for the risk of recurrent disc herniation <30%, discectomy with transpedicular fixation - for risk of disc herniation >30%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信