辅助卵母细胞激活在有各种生殖问题的夫妇中的临床应用:系统回顾

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01671-z
Shayesteh Mehdinejadiani, Nasim Goudarzi, Fatemeh Masjedi, Azam Govahi, Maryam Mirani, Kobra Mehdinejadiani, Nahid Azad
{"title":"辅助卵母细胞激活在有各种生殖问题的夫妇中的临床应用:系统回顾","authors":"Shayesteh Mehdinejadiani, Nasim Goudarzi, Fatemeh Masjedi, Azam Govahi, Maryam Mirani, Kobra Mehdinejadiani, Nahid Azad","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01671-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ICSI may face fertilization failure, prompting the use of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) techniques. While AOA is implemented in infertility clinics, its target patients and definitive application remain uncertain. This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess reproductive outcomes in ICSI-AOA cycles compared to conventional ICSI and evaluate AOA effectiveness in various infertility disorders. A literature search encompassed PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until December 2023 for relevant English studies. Included studies compared ICSI-AOA with conventional ICSI in couples with prior fertilization failure, utilizing diverse AOA methods. Control groups consisted of sibling oocytes, previous cycles of the same couples, or couples undergoing conventional ICSI. Evaluated outcomes included fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Article screening and data extraction were performed by two authors, with risk of bias assessed by another investigator. Out of 3088 initially identified articles, 30 studies were included, focusing on fertilization failure (n = 10), female infertility (n = 3), PLCζ defects (n = 4), poor sperm quality (n = 4), Globozoospermia (n = 4), and surgically retrieved sperm (n = 8). Most studies concluded that AOA could overcome fertilization failure, but success rates varied based on sperm-related or oocyte-related factors in ICSI-AOA cycles. Due to differences in patient inclusion criteria and sample sizes, most studies were not sufficiently similar for pooled analysis, limiting robust conclusions. There is insufficient evidence, particularly from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to determine the efficacy or safety of ICSI-AOA as a treatment strategy. Registration number is PROSPERO, CRD42024551221.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Applications of Assisted Oocyte Activation in Couples with Various Reproductive Problems: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Shayesteh Mehdinejadiani, Nasim Goudarzi, Fatemeh Masjedi, Azam Govahi, Maryam Mirani, Kobra Mehdinejadiani, Nahid Azad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-024-01671-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ICSI may face fertilization failure, prompting the use of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) techniques. While AOA is implemented in infertility clinics, its target patients and definitive application remain uncertain. This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess reproductive outcomes in ICSI-AOA cycles compared to conventional ICSI and evaluate AOA effectiveness in various infertility disorders. A literature search encompassed PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until December 2023 for relevant English studies. Included studies compared ICSI-AOA with conventional ICSI in couples with prior fertilization failure, utilizing diverse AOA methods. Control groups consisted of sibling oocytes, previous cycles of the same couples, or couples undergoing conventional ICSI. Evaluated outcomes included fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Article screening and data extraction were performed by two authors, with risk of bias assessed by another investigator. Out of 3088 initially identified articles, 30 studies were included, focusing on fertilization failure (n = 10), female infertility (n = 3), PLCζ defects (n = 4), poor sperm quality (n = 4), Globozoospermia (n = 4), and surgically retrieved sperm (n = 8). Most studies concluded that AOA could overcome fertilization failure, but success rates varied based on sperm-related or oocyte-related factors in ICSI-AOA cycles. Due to differences in patient inclusion criteria and sample sizes, most studies were not sufficiently similar for pooled analysis, limiting robust conclusions. There is insufficient evidence, particularly from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to determine the efficacy or safety of ICSI-AOA as a treatment strategy. Registration number is PROSPERO, CRD42024551221.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01671-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01671-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)可能会面临受精失败的问题,因此需要使用辅助卵母细胞激活(AOA)技术。虽然辅助卵母细胞激活技术已在不孕不育诊所实施,但其目标患者和明确应用仍不确定。本系统综述遵循系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,评估ICSI-AOA周期与传统ICSI相比的生殖结果,并评估AOA对各种不孕症的有效性。截至 2023 年 12 月,文献检索涵盖了 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Scopus 数据库中的相关英文研究。纳入的研究比较了ICSI-AOA与传统ICSI的不同AOA方法,分别用于受精失败的夫妇。对照组包括同胞卵母细胞、同一对夫妇之前的周期或接受常规 ICSI 的夫妇。评估结果包括受精率、卵裂率、胚胎质量、植入率、妊娠率和活产率。文章筛选和数据提取由两位作者完成,偏倚风险由另一位研究者评估。在初步确定的 3088 篇文章中,有 30 项研究被纳入其中,主要涉及受精失败(10 项)、女性不孕(3 项)、PLCζ 缺陷(4 项)、精子质量差(4 项)、无精子症(4 项)和手术取精(8 项)。大多数研究认为,AOA 可以克服受精失败,但在 ICSI-AOA 周期中,成功率因精子相关因素或卵母细胞相关因素而异。由于纳入患者的标准和样本量不同,大多数研究的相似性不足以进行汇总分析,从而限制了得出可靠结论的可能性。目前还没有足够的证据,尤其是来自随机对照试验(RCT)的证据,来确定 ICSI-AOA 作为一种治疗策略的有效性或安全性。注册号为 PROSPERO,CRD42024551221。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical Applications of Assisted Oocyte Activation in Couples with Various Reproductive Problems: A Systematic Review.

Clinical Applications of Assisted Oocyte Activation in Couples with Various Reproductive Problems: A Systematic Review.

ICSI may face fertilization failure, prompting the use of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) techniques. While AOA is implemented in infertility clinics, its target patients and definitive application remain uncertain. This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess reproductive outcomes in ICSI-AOA cycles compared to conventional ICSI and evaluate AOA effectiveness in various infertility disorders. A literature search encompassed PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until December 2023 for relevant English studies. Included studies compared ICSI-AOA with conventional ICSI in couples with prior fertilization failure, utilizing diverse AOA methods. Control groups consisted of sibling oocytes, previous cycles of the same couples, or couples undergoing conventional ICSI. Evaluated outcomes included fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Article screening and data extraction were performed by two authors, with risk of bias assessed by another investigator. Out of 3088 initially identified articles, 30 studies were included, focusing on fertilization failure (n = 10), female infertility (n = 3), PLCζ defects (n = 4), poor sperm quality (n = 4), Globozoospermia (n = 4), and surgically retrieved sperm (n = 8). Most studies concluded that AOA could overcome fertilization failure, but success rates varied based on sperm-related or oocyte-related factors in ICSI-AOA cycles. Due to differences in patient inclusion criteria and sample sizes, most studies were not sufficiently similar for pooled analysis, limiting robust conclusions. There is insufficient evidence, particularly from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to determine the efficacy or safety of ICSI-AOA as a treatment strategy. Registration number is PROSPERO, CRD42024551221.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信